New strategies for non-targeted quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: The potential of reconstructed TIC response factor surfaces

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jason Devers, David I. Pattison, Asger B. Hansen, Jan H. Christensen
{"title":"New strategies for non-targeted quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: The potential of reconstructed TIC response factor surfaces","authors":"Jason Devers,&nbsp;David I. Pattison,&nbsp;Asger B. Hansen,&nbsp;Jan H. Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) offers unrivaled peak capacity and the ability to resolve and characterize hundreds to thousands of compounds within complex environmental samples. Knowledge of their concentrations is essential in assessing their toxicological and regulatory relevance; however, reliable quantification typically requires concurrent analysis of an authentic standard for each compound. Response factors (RF) may be used to estimate the concentration of a compound without the need for its respective standard, but this is not routinely employed in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). This study demonstrates that GC × GC offers a new opportunity for the calculation of RFs and estimating a compounds concentration via the creation of 2D total ion current (TIC) response factor surfaces (RFS). A new method, linking a compounds retention time coordinate to its RF using a reconstructed TIC approach, was used to calculate the concentration of 27 compounds in both solvent and effluent wastewater matrix. Using both suspect screening and non-targeted methodologies, average fold change errors of 1.58 and 1.83 respectively were determined for the novel RFS approach. The approach was compared to an RF prediction model utilizing molecular descriptors, using a genetic algorithm, partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) model. The accuracy of the RFS method demonstrates its potential in the fields of suspect screening and non-targeted analysis, where realistic concentration estimates are required. The RFS approach delivers comparable accuracy in concentration prediction compared to computational approaches for determining RFs, but crucially, without the need for generating molecular descriptors or acquiring a reference standard. Additionally, a purely non-targeted approach outlined can allow for the calculation of RF for features without the need for identification or a reference spectrum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1747 ","pages":"Article 465811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325001591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) offers unrivaled peak capacity and the ability to resolve and characterize hundreds to thousands of compounds within complex environmental samples. Knowledge of their concentrations is essential in assessing their toxicological and regulatory relevance; however, reliable quantification typically requires concurrent analysis of an authentic standard for each compound. Response factors (RF) may be used to estimate the concentration of a compound without the need for its respective standard, but this is not routinely employed in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). This study demonstrates that GC × GC offers a new opportunity for the calculation of RFs and estimating a compounds concentration via the creation of 2D total ion current (TIC) response factor surfaces (RFS). A new method, linking a compounds retention time coordinate to its RF using a reconstructed TIC approach, was used to calculate the concentration of 27 compounds in both solvent and effluent wastewater matrix. Using both suspect screening and non-targeted methodologies, average fold change errors of 1.58 and 1.83 respectively were determined for the novel RFS approach. The approach was compared to an RF prediction model utilizing molecular descriptors, using a genetic algorithm, partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) model. The accuracy of the RFS method demonstrates its potential in the fields of suspect screening and non-targeted analysis, where realistic concentration estimates are required. The RFS approach delivers comparable accuracy in concentration prediction compared to computational approaches for determining RFs, but crucially, without the need for generating molecular descriptors or acquiring a reference standard. Additionally, a purely non-targeted approach outlined can allow for the calculation of RF for features without the need for identification or a reference spectrum.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信