Replacement of soya bean meal and corn by field peas in young bulls fattening diets: Performance, rumen fermentation, nitrogen use and metabolism

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Isabel Casasús , Daniel Villalba , Margalida Joy , Sandra Costa-Roura , Mireia Blanco
{"title":"Replacement of soya bean meal and corn by field peas in young bulls fattening diets: Performance, rumen fermentation, nitrogen use and metabolism","authors":"Isabel Casasús ,&nbsp;Daniel Villalba ,&nbsp;Margalida Joy ,&nbsp;Sandra Costa-Roura ,&nbsp;Mireia Blanco","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the interest in field peas replacing soya bean meal and corn at different rates in beef fattening diets by assessing impacts on animal performance, ruminal fermentation, nitrogen use and economic output. Thirty-two Parda de Montaña young bulls (210 ± 24.3 kg BW) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments (0 %, 15 %, 30 %, 45 % peas in isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets). After 23 d adaptation, fattening was divided into Growing (first 134 d) and Finishing (from d 135–500 kg - target slaughter BW). Daily weight gains were higher (P &lt; 0.001) and the DM intake and feed conversion ratio were lower (P &lt; 0.001) during Growing vs. Finishing. Ruminal NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations were lower and total VFA were higher during Growing vs. Finishing (P &lt; 0.001). Increasing proportion of field peas did not affect daily gains or carcass traits, tended to have a cubic effect on DM intake (P = 0.06) and a quadratic effect on days on feed (P = 0.09), but did not affect the feed conversion ratio. Ruminal fluid pH decreased and total VFA increased linearly with increased pea inclusion, whereas NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration (P = 0.06) and the proportions of propionic (P = 0.06) and butyric acids (P = 0.06) tended to display quadratic patterns, but acetic acid was not affected (P = 0.18). N intake did not differ among diets, but faecal N excretion decreased linearly (P = 0.002) and urine N excretion increased linearly (P = 0.02) with increasing proportion of pea. The gross margin obtained with 30 % peas was the best in four scenarios considering different relative feed ingredient prices. These results support the interest in including up to 30 % field peas in beef fattening diets but given the shift in the route of N excretion from faeces to urine, irrespectively of the period, these alternatives’ environmental interest should be assessed at a territorial scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 116273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125000689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the interest in field peas replacing soya bean meal and corn at different rates in beef fattening diets by assessing impacts on animal performance, ruminal fermentation, nitrogen use and economic output. Thirty-two Parda de Montaña young bulls (210 ± 24.3 kg BW) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments (0 %, 15 %, 30 %, 45 % peas in isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets). After 23 d adaptation, fattening was divided into Growing (first 134 d) and Finishing (from d 135–500 kg - target slaughter BW). Daily weight gains were higher (P < 0.001) and the DM intake and feed conversion ratio were lower (P < 0.001) during Growing vs. Finishing. Ruminal NH3-N concentrations were lower and total VFA were higher during Growing vs. Finishing (P < 0.001). Increasing proportion of field peas did not affect daily gains or carcass traits, tended to have a cubic effect on DM intake (P = 0.06) and a quadratic effect on days on feed (P = 0.09), but did not affect the feed conversion ratio. Ruminal fluid pH decreased and total VFA increased linearly with increased pea inclusion, whereas NH3-N concentration (P = 0.06) and the proportions of propionic (P = 0.06) and butyric acids (P = 0.06) tended to display quadratic patterns, but acetic acid was not affected (P = 0.18). N intake did not differ among diets, but faecal N excretion decreased linearly (P = 0.002) and urine N excretion increased linearly (P = 0.02) with increasing proportion of pea. The gross margin obtained with 30 % peas was the best in four scenarios considering different relative feed ingredient prices. These results support the interest in including up to 30 % field peas in beef fattening diets but given the shift in the route of N excretion from faeces to urine, irrespectively of the period, these alternatives’ environmental interest should be assessed at a territorial scale.
用大田豌豆代替豆粕和玉米对犊牛增肥性能、瘤胃发酵、氮利用和代谢的影响
本研究通过评估对动物生产性能、瘤胃发酵、氮素利用和经济产出的影响,探讨了在牛肉增肥饲粮中以不同比例替代豆粕和玉米的可行性。试验选用32头体重为210 ± 24.3 kg体重的Montaña公公牛,随机分为4组(0 %、15 %、30 %、45 %豌豆),分别饲喂等氮等能饲粮。适应23 d后,育肥分为生长期(前134 d)和肥育期(135 ~ 500 kg -目标屠宰体重)。生长与育肥期间日增重较高(P <; 0.001),干物质采食量和饲料系数较低(P <; 0.001)。生长期间瘤胃NH3-N浓度较低,总挥发性脂肪酸较高(P <; 0.001)。增加大田豌豆比例对日增重和胴体性状无显著影响,对干物质采食量呈立方效应(P = 0.06),对采食量呈二次效应(P = 0.09),但对饲料系数无显著影响。随着豌豆包埋量的增加,瘤胃液pH降低,总VFA增加,NH3-N浓度(P = 0.06)和丙酸(P = 0.06)、丁酸(P = 0.06)呈二次型变化,乙酸不受影响(P = 0.18)。饲粮中氮摄入量无显著差异,但粪氮排泄量随豌豆添加比例的增加呈线性降低(P = 0.002),尿氮排泄量呈线性升高(P = 0.02)。在考虑相对饲料原料价格不同的4种情况下,30% %豌豆的毛利率最高。这些结果支持在牛肉增肥饲料中添加高达30% %的田豌豆的兴趣,但考虑到从粪便到尿液的氮排泄途径的转变,无论在哪个时期,这些替代品的环境利益应该在领土范围内进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信