What is a better chicken? Exploring trade-offs between animal welfare and greenhouse gas emissions in higher-welfare broiler systems

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
L. Karlsson , L. Keeling , E. Röös
{"title":"What is a better chicken? Exploring trade-offs between animal welfare and greenhouse gas emissions in higher-welfare broiler systems","authors":"L. Karlsson ,&nbsp;L. Keeling ,&nbsp;E. Röös","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the animal welfare concerns in conventional methods of rearing broilers, chicken raised for meat, there is a push towards transition to higher welfare methods. However, this results in trade-offs as some aspects of higher welfare systems reduce production efficiency and thus increase greenhouse gas emissions. These trade-offs have however rarely been studied. This study aims to further the understanding by comparing the impact of reducing stocking density and switching to slower-growing broiler hybrids on broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. Impacts on broiler welfare were determined by synthesizing quantitative welfare indicators from recent studies which assessed the welfare of broilers at different stocking densities and/or growth rates. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions from introducing these changes were modelled for chicken meat produced in Swedish broiler systems. Then, the magnitude of trade-offs associated with a reduced stocking density and/or use of slower-growing broilers were determined based on how these impacted broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. The largest trade-offs were found when using slower-growing hybrids, since while this increased broiler welfare considerably, it also increased greenhouse gas emissions. The magnitude of the trade-offs was largely dependent on the growth rate of the slower-growing hybrid. Slower growth rates increased feed intake, and hence greenhouse gas emissions, but increased greenhouse gas emissions were partly offset by reduced emissions from parent animals. Trade-offs were smaller when reducing the stocking density in broiler houses, due to a moderate improvement of welfare but only a slight impact on greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the existing tensions between improving broiler welfare and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and the need for tools to navigate these trade-offs. However, as greenhouse gas emissions from broiler production remain considerably lower than those of other livestock when higher welfare methods are used, we question whether minimizing greenhouse gas emissions should be a priority when conflicting with improving broiler and breeder welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 203-216"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the animal welfare concerns in conventional methods of rearing broilers, chicken raised for meat, there is a push towards transition to higher welfare methods. However, this results in trade-offs as some aspects of higher welfare systems reduce production efficiency and thus increase greenhouse gas emissions. These trade-offs have however rarely been studied. This study aims to further the understanding by comparing the impact of reducing stocking density and switching to slower-growing broiler hybrids on broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. Impacts on broiler welfare were determined by synthesizing quantitative welfare indicators from recent studies which assessed the welfare of broilers at different stocking densities and/or growth rates. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions from introducing these changes were modelled for chicken meat produced in Swedish broiler systems. Then, the magnitude of trade-offs associated with a reduced stocking density and/or use of slower-growing broilers were determined based on how these impacted broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. The largest trade-offs were found when using slower-growing hybrids, since while this increased broiler welfare considerably, it also increased greenhouse gas emissions. The magnitude of the trade-offs was largely dependent on the growth rate of the slower-growing hybrid. Slower growth rates increased feed intake, and hence greenhouse gas emissions, but increased greenhouse gas emissions were partly offset by reduced emissions from parent animals. Trade-offs were smaller when reducing the stocking density in broiler houses, due to a moderate improvement of welfare but only a slight impact on greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the existing tensions between improving broiler welfare and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and the need for tools to navigate these trade-offs. However, as greenhouse gas emissions from broiler production remain considerably lower than those of other livestock when higher welfare methods are used, we question whether minimizing greenhouse gas emissions should be a priority when conflicting with improving broiler and breeder welfare.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信