Innovative deep eutectic solvent approach vs. conventional alkaline for kenaf seed protein extraction: A comprehensive comparison of structural, thermal, nutritional and techno-functional properties

IF 6.3 1区农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ifset.2025.103972

Brisha Arulrajah , Mohammed S. Qoms , Wan Zunairah Wan Ibadullah , Nazamid Saari

{"title":"Innovative deep eutectic solvent approach vs. conventional alkaline for kenaf seed protein extraction: A comprehensive comparison of structural, thermal, nutritional and techno-functional properties","authors":"Brisha Arulrajah , Mohammed S. Qoms , Wan Zunairah Wan Ibadullah , Nazamid Saari","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2025.103972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study was the first to compare the effects of innovative deep eutectic solvent-based green extractant (ChCl:U and ChCl:Gly) and conventional alkaline solubilisation-acid precipitation (CA) approaches on kenaf seed protein extractability, structural, thermal, nutritional and techno-functional properties. Both CA and ChCl:U methods showed better protein extractability than ChCl:Gly. DES-based extraction induced lesser structural changes in kenaf seed protein compared to CA method. All proteins displayed high digestibility, but DES extraction produced more balanced amino acid ratios. Both CA and ChCl:U methods exhibited superior functional performance at all the tested pH compared to ChCl:Gly. Notably, CA demonstrated superior emulsification properties, whereas ChCl:U exhibited the highest foaming properties. The emulsification and foaming activities with all extraction methods were the highest in alkaline conditions, while better stabilities were observed in acidic conditions. Overall, the DES protein extraction method using ChCl:U can be employed as green alternative for extracting kenaf seed protein.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 103972"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856425000566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was the first to compare the effects of innovative deep eutectic solvent-based green extractant (ChCl:U and ChCl:Gly) and conventional alkaline solubilisation-acid precipitation (CA) approaches on kenaf seed protein extractability, structural, thermal, nutritional and techno-functional properties. Both CA and ChCl:U methods showed better protein extractability than ChCl:Gly. DES-based extraction induced lesser structural changes in kenaf seed protein compared to CA method. All proteins displayed high digestibility, but DES extraction produced more balanced amino acid ratios. Both CA and ChCl:U methods exhibited superior functional performance at all the tested pH compared to ChCl:Gly. Notably, CA demonstrated superior emulsification properties, whereas ChCl:U exhibited the highest foaming properties. The emulsification and foaming activities with all extraction methods were the highest in alkaline conditions, while better stabilities were observed in acidic conditions. Overall, the DES protein extraction method using ChCl:U can be employed as green alternative for extracting kenaf seed protein.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 工程技术-食品科技

CiteScore

12.00

自引率

6.10%

发文量

259

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.