Validation of changes in stage by the new N category in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging for resected non-small cell lung cancer

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109690
Yura Ahn , Sang Min Lee , Jooae Choe , Sehoon Choi , Kyung-Hyun Do , Joon Beom Seo
{"title":"Validation of changes in stage by the new N category in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging for resected non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Yura Ahn ,&nbsp;Sang Min Lee ,&nbsp;Jooae Choe ,&nbsp;Sehoon Choi ,&nbsp;Kyung-Hyun Do ,&nbsp;Joon Beom Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The reclassification following N2 subcategorization (N2a vs. N2b) in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging has not yet been externally validated. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the survival outcomes of reclassified stages in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) comparison and risk stratification within the pathologic N category (pN0, 1, 2a, 2b), node-positive T1 tumors (T1N1, T1N2a, T1N2b), stage IIB tumors (T1N2a, T2N1, T3N0), and T2–3N2 tumors (stage IIIA, IIIB) were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 3864 patients were analyzed, including 962 patients with pathologically node-positive tumors. pN2a and pN2b tumors exhibited distinct survival (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Survival separation between neighboring pT1N1-2b tumors was statistically marginal (<em>p</em> = 0.06 and 0.09); however, clear separation was observed in clinical T1 tumors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). pT1N2a tumors that were downstaged from stage IIIA to stage IIB showed comparable survival to other stage IIB tumors (vs. pT2N1 and pT3N0; <em>p</em> = 0.79 and 0.35, respectively). In pT2-3 tumors (stage IIIA and IIIB), OS risk stratification between pN2a and pN2b tumors, except for between pT3N2a and pT2N2b, was valid (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The reclassification of stages in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging based on N2 subcategorization is considered reasonable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 109690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325001180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The reclassification following N2 subcategorization (N2a vs. N2b) in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging has not yet been externally validated. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the survival outcomes of reclassified stages in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) comparison and risk stratification within the pathologic N category (pN0, 1, 2a, 2b), node-positive T1 tumors (T1N1, T1N2a, T1N2b), stage IIB tumors (T1N2a, T2N1, T3N0), and T2–3N2 tumors (stage IIIA, IIIB) were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

A total of 3864 patients were analyzed, including 962 patients with pathologically node-positive tumors. pN2a and pN2b tumors exhibited distinct survival (p < 0.001). Survival separation between neighboring pT1N1-2b tumors was statistically marginal (p = 0.06 and 0.09); however, clear separation was observed in clinical T1 tumors (p < 0.05). pT1N2a tumors that were downstaged from stage IIIA to stage IIB showed comparable survival to other stage IIB tumors (vs. pT2N1 and pT3N0; p = 0.79 and 0.35, respectively). In pT2-3 tumors (stage IIIA and IIIB), OS risk stratification between pN2a and pN2b tumors, except for between pT3N2a and pT2N2b, was valid (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The reclassification of stages in the 9th edition of lung cancer staging based on N2 subcategorization is considered reasonable.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信