Augmentative transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left orbitofrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: An acute and follow-up study

Matteo Vismara , Sara Torriero , Kevin La Monica , Beatrice Benatti , Luca Larini , Chiara Bucca , Nicolaja Girone , Monica Bosi , Bernardo Dell’Osso
{"title":"Augmentative transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left orbitofrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: An acute and follow-up study","authors":"Matteo Vismara ,&nbsp;Sara Torriero ,&nbsp;Kevin La Monica ,&nbsp;Beatrice Benatti ,&nbsp;Luca Larini ,&nbsp;Chiara Bucca ,&nbsp;Nicolaja Girone ,&nbsp;Monica Bosi ,&nbsp;Bernardo Dell’Osso","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2025.105511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling and chronic medical condition which impairs the overall functioning and the quality of life of affected individuals. At the current moment up to 60% of patients do not show a satisfactory response, and among alternative approaches for treatment-resistant OCD, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) showed promising results in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Despite this, stimulation parameters are still heterogeneous, and additional investigations are needed to support these data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>OCD patients with characteristic of treatment resistance were included in this open-label trial. The stimulation protocol consisted of one daily session, five days a week for three weeks, for a total of 15 sessions. The left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) was the target, stimulated at 80% of the motor threshold, with a frequency of 1 Hz, 600 pulses per session. All patients maintained fixed medication doses during the trial. Primary outcome measures comprised the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S) scores, assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the treatment (T1), and after a follow-up of one month (T2). We identified responders with a Y-BOCS reduction of ≥35% at T1. General linear model repeated measures were used to compare scores at psychometric scales, chi-squared test was used to compare variables between responders and non-responders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen patients completed the psychometric assessment (males: 69.2%; females: 30.8%, mean age: 43.1 ± 10.2 years). We observed a significant reduction at the end of the treatment on the Y-BOCS (T0:23.4 ± 8.9 - T1:18.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.009), HAM-A (T0:13.8 ± 7.4-T1:8.6 ± 4, p = 0.006), HAM-D (T0:13.2 ± 5.8 - T1:9.5 ± 3.6, p = 0.014), SDS (T0:22.7 ± 6.2 - T1:18.3 ± 5.1, p = 0.008), and CGI-S scores (T0:4.8 ± 0.8 - T1:4.3 ± 0.9, p = 0.027). Among all timepoints, a trend of significance for reduction of Y-BOCS and HAM-A scores emerged (p = 0.075 and p = 0.077, respectively), while HAM-D scores were significantly reduced after one month (p = 0.047). Responders constituted 30.8% (N = 4) of the sample. Worse clinical variables were more frequently observed in non-responders compared to responders: a higher rate of psychiatric familiarity and a higher rate of lifetime suicidal ideation. The only side effect reported was mild and transient headache during stimulation (N = 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data support the efficacy and tolerability of rTMS over the left OFC on obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxious symptoms in treatment-resistant OCD, overall associated with a reduction of disability and functional impairment. Additionally, one third of patients showed a response and results suggest a maintenance of efficacy after one month follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 105511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408525001036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling and chronic medical condition which impairs the overall functioning and the quality of life of affected individuals. At the current moment up to 60% of patients do not show a satisfactory response, and among alternative approaches for treatment-resistant OCD, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) showed promising results in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Despite this, stimulation parameters are still heterogeneous, and additional investigations are needed to support these data.

Methods

OCD patients with characteristic of treatment resistance were included in this open-label trial. The stimulation protocol consisted of one daily session, five days a week for three weeks, for a total of 15 sessions. The left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) was the target, stimulated at 80% of the motor threshold, with a frequency of 1 Hz, 600 pulses per session. All patients maintained fixed medication doses during the trial. Primary outcome measures comprised the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S) scores, assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the treatment (T1), and after a follow-up of one month (T2). We identified responders with a Y-BOCS reduction of ≥35% at T1. General linear model repeated measures were used to compare scores at psychometric scales, chi-squared test was used to compare variables between responders and non-responders.

Results

Thirteen patients completed the psychometric assessment (males: 69.2%; females: 30.8%, mean age: 43.1 ± 10.2 years). We observed a significant reduction at the end of the treatment on the Y-BOCS (T0:23.4 ± 8.9 - T1:18.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.009), HAM-A (T0:13.8 ± 7.4-T1:8.6 ± 4, p = 0.006), HAM-D (T0:13.2 ± 5.8 - T1:9.5 ± 3.6, p = 0.014), SDS (T0:22.7 ± 6.2 - T1:18.3 ± 5.1, p = 0.008), and CGI-S scores (T0:4.8 ± 0.8 - T1:4.3 ± 0.9, p = 0.027). Among all timepoints, a trend of significance for reduction of Y-BOCS and HAM-A scores emerged (p = 0.075 and p = 0.077, respectively), while HAM-D scores were significantly reduced after one month (p = 0.047). Responders constituted 30.8% (N = 4) of the sample. Worse clinical variables were more frequently observed in non-responders compared to responders: a higher rate of psychiatric familiarity and a higher rate of lifetime suicidal ideation. The only side effect reported was mild and transient headache during stimulation (N = 1).

Conclusions

Our data support the efficacy and tolerability of rTMS over the left OFC on obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxious symptoms in treatment-resistant OCD, overall associated with a reduction of disability and functional impairment. Additionally, one third of patients showed a response and results suggest a maintenance of efficacy after one month follow-up.
难治性强迫症患者左眼窝额叶皮质增强经颅磁刺激:一项急性和随访研究
强迫症(OCD)是一种致残和慢性疾病,它损害了受影响个体的整体功能和生活质量。目前,高达60%的患者没有表现出令人满意的反应,在治疗难治性强迫症的替代方法中,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在疗效和耐受性方面显示出令人满意的结果。尽管如此,增产参数仍然是不均匀的,需要进一步的研究来支持这些数据。方法采用开放标签方法,选取具有治疗耐药特征的socd患者。刺激方案包括每天一次,每周五天,持续三周,总共15次。左眼窝前额皮质(OFC)是目标,以80%的运动阈值刺激,频率为1赫兹,每次600次脉冲。所有患者在试验期间保持固定的药物剂量。主要结果测量包括耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)、希恩残疾量表(SDS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI-S)得分,分别在基线(T0)、治疗结束(T1)和随访一个月后(T2)进行评估。我们确定了T1时Y-BOCS降低≥35%的应答者。采用一般线性模型重复测量法比较心理测量量表得分,采用卡方检验比较反应者和无反应者之间的变量。结果13例患者完成了心理测量评估,其中男性占69.2%;女性:30.8%,平均年龄:43.1±10.2岁。我们观察到显著减少在治疗结束Y-BOCS (T0:23.4±8.9 - T1:18.2±7.2,p = 0.009), HAM-A (T0:13.8±7.4 -t1:8.6±4,p = 0.006), ham - d (T0:13.2±5.8 - T1:9.5±3.6,p = 0.014), SDS (T0:22.7±6.2 - T1:18.3±5.1,p = 0.008),和CGI-S分数(T0:4.8±0.8 - T1:4.3±0.9,p = 0.027)。各时间点Y-BOCS和HAM-A评分均有显著下降趋势(p = 0.075和p = 0.077), HAM-D评分在1个月后显著下降(p = 0.047)。应答者占30.8% (N = 4)。与应答者相比,无应答者更常观察到更糟糕的临床变量:更高的精神病学熟悉率和更高的终生自杀意念率。唯一的副作用是刺激时的轻微和短暂性头痛(N = 1)。结论我们的数据支持rTMS对治疗难治性强迫症患者的强迫、抑郁和焦虑症状的有效性和耐受性,总体上与残疾和功能损害的减少有关。此外,三分之一的患者表现出反应,结果表明在一个月的随访后疗效保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信