Episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander nulliparous individuals in California

Tracy Chidyausiku MS , Shalmali Bane PhD , Meryl M. Sperling MD , Elliott K. Main MD , Suzan L. Carmichael PhD
{"title":"Episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander nulliparous individuals in California","authors":"Tracy Chidyausiku MS ,&nbsp;Shalmali Bane PhD ,&nbsp;Meryl M. Sperling MD ,&nbsp;Elliott K. Main MD ,&nbsp;Suzan L. Carmichael PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals have increased risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. The Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander population in the US is diverse yet few studies disaggregate results within specific ethnicity populations.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigated the variability in risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 disaggregated Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander groups, compared to Non-Hispanic White nulliparous individuals, and assessed what factors may explain the variability in risk.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Birth and fetal death certificate files linked to hospital discharge records were used to identify nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex vaginal deliveries among California births, 2007 to 2020. Poisson regression models were used to examine risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ethnicity subgroups compared with Non-Hispanic White individuals. Sequential adjustment was utilized to assess if maternal social, health-related, and delivery-related factors may explain the variability in risk for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 224,964 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals in this study cohort, the overall prevalence of episiotomy was 18.5% (N = 41,559) and prevalence of severe perineal laceration was 8.9% (N = 20,013); the prevalence of both outcomes declined during the study period. Within subgroups, prevalence of episiotomy ranged from 9.8% among Other-Pacific Islander individuals to 24.5% among Korean individuals. Prevalence of severe perineal laceration ranged from 3.4% in Guamanian individuals to 15.2% in Indian individuals. In fully adjusted models, risk ratios were greater than 1.0 (with confidence intervals excluding 1.0) for 6 subgroups for episiotomy and 9 subgroups for severe perineal laceration, compared to Non-Hispanic White individuals. After adjustment, Korean individuals were at highest risk of episiotomy (adjusted risk ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.75, 1.85]), and Indian individuals were at highest risk of severe perineal laceration (adjusted risk ratio 2.14 [95% CI 2.07, 2.21]). Adjustment for social factors (nativity; education; payer) tended to attenuate risk ratios; subsequent adjustment for maternal health and delivery-related factors including maternal age, height, pre-pregnancy body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, gestational weight gain, fetal stress/incomplete fetal head rotation (occiput transverse or posterior), large infant size or shoulder dystocia, and forceps/vacuum did not impact risk ratios substantially.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prevalence and risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration varied widely among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander births in California from 2007 to 2020. The variability in risks was more influenced by differences in social rather than maternal health and delivery-related factors. This study adds to the growing understanding of disparities in health outcomes among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander subgroups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals have increased risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. The Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander population in the US is diverse yet few studies disaggregate results within specific ethnicity populations.

Objective

This study investigated the variability in risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 disaggregated Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander groups, compared to Non-Hispanic White nulliparous individuals, and assessed what factors may explain the variability in risk.

Study design

Birth and fetal death certificate files linked to hospital discharge records were used to identify nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex vaginal deliveries among California births, 2007 to 2020. Poisson regression models were used to examine risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ethnicity subgroups compared with Non-Hispanic White individuals. Sequential adjustment was utilized to assess if maternal social, health-related, and delivery-related factors may explain the variability in risk for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration.

Results

Among the 224,964 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals in this study cohort, the overall prevalence of episiotomy was 18.5% (N = 41,559) and prevalence of severe perineal laceration was 8.9% (N = 20,013); the prevalence of both outcomes declined during the study period. Within subgroups, prevalence of episiotomy ranged from 9.8% among Other-Pacific Islander individuals to 24.5% among Korean individuals. Prevalence of severe perineal laceration ranged from 3.4% in Guamanian individuals to 15.2% in Indian individuals. In fully adjusted models, risk ratios were greater than 1.0 (with confidence intervals excluding 1.0) for 6 subgroups for episiotomy and 9 subgroups for severe perineal laceration, compared to Non-Hispanic White individuals. After adjustment, Korean individuals were at highest risk of episiotomy (adjusted risk ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.75, 1.85]), and Indian individuals were at highest risk of severe perineal laceration (adjusted risk ratio 2.14 [95% CI 2.07, 2.21]). Adjustment for social factors (nativity; education; payer) tended to attenuate risk ratios; subsequent adjustment for maternal health and delivery-related factors including maternal age, height, pre-pregnancy body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, gestational weight gain, fetal stress/incomplete fetal head rotation (occiput transverse or posterior), large infant size or shoulder dystocia, and forceps/vacuum did not impact risk ratios substantially.

Conclusion

Prevalence and risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration varied widely among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander births in California from 2007 to 2020. The variability in risks was more influenced by differences in social rather than maternal health and delivery-related factors. This study adds to the growing understanding of disparities in health outcomes among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander subgroups.
加州亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民未生育个体的会阴切开和严重会阴撕裂
亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民在阴道分娩时发生会阴切开术和严重会阴撕裂伤的风险增加。亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民在美国的人口是多样化的,但很少有研究在特定的种族人群中分解结果。目的:本研究调查了16个亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民群体与非西班牙裔白人无产个体相比,会阴切开术和严重会阴撕裂伤风险的变异性,并评估了哪些因素可能解释了风险的变异性。研究设计:与出院记录相关的出生和胎儿死亡证明文件用于识别2007年至2020年加州出生的无产、足月、单胎和阴道顶点分娩。泊松回归模型用于比较16个亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民种族亚群与非西班牙裔白人的会阴切开术和严重会阴撕裂的风险。序贯调整用于评估母体社会、健康相关和分娩相关因素是否可以解释会阴切开术和严重会阴撕裂伤风险的变异性。结果在本研究队列中的224,964名亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民中,会阴切开术的总体患病率为18.5% (N = 41,559),严重会阴撕裂伤的患病率为8.9% (N = 20,013);在研究期间,这两种结果的患病率都有所下降。在亚群中,外阴切开术的患病率从其他太平洋岛民的9.8%到韩国人的24.5%不等。严重会阴撕裂伤的患病率从巴拿马人的3.4%到印度人的15.2%不等。在完全调整的模型中,与非西班牙裔白人相比,外阴切开术的6个亚组和严重会阴撕裂伤的9个亚组的风险比大于1.0(可信区间不包括1.0)。调整后,韩国人发生会阴切开术的风险最高(调整风险比1.80 [95% CI 1.75, 1.85]),印度人发生严重会阴撕裂伤的风险最高(调整风险比2.14 [95% CI 2.07, 2.21])。社会因素调整(出生;教育;付款人)倾向于降低风险比率;随后调整产妇健康和分娩相关因素,包括产妇年龄、身高、孕前体重指数、高血压、糖尿病、妊娠期体重增加、胎儿压力/胎儿头部旋转不完全(枕部横向或后向)、婴儿体型过大或肩部难产、产钳/真空对风险比没有显著影响。结论2007 - 2020年出生在加州的亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民的会阴切开术和严重会阴撕裂的患病率和风险差异很大。风险的可变性更多地受到社会差异的影响,而不是受到孕产妇健康和分娩相关因素的影响。这项研究增加了对亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民亚群之间健康结果差异的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信