A systematic review on the assessment of pregnancy-specific psychological trauma during pregnancy: A call to action

Soudabeh Givrad MD , Kathryn M. Wall , Lindsey Wallace Goldman , Jin Young Shin , Eloise H. Novak , Amanda Lowell , Francesca Penner , Michèle J. Day , Lea Papa , Drew Wright , Helena J.V. Rutherford
{"title":"A systematic review on the assessment of pregnancy-specific psychological trauma during pregnancy: A call to action","authors":"Soudabeh Givrad MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Wall ,&nbsp;Lindsey Wallace Goldman ,&nbsp;Jin Young Shin ,&nbsp;Eloise H. Novak ,&nbsp;Amanda Lowell ,&nbsp;Francesca Penner ,&nbsp;Michèle J. Day ,&nbsp;Lea Papa ,&nbsp;Drew Wright ,&nbsp;Helena J.V. Rutherford","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Psychological trauma negatively impacts maternal and infant health during the perinatal period. A history of traumatic experiences related to previous pregnancies and births (termed pregnancy-specific psychological trauma or PSPT) increases the risk of a host of psychological disorders. It can impede women's/the pregnant individual's relationship with the healthcare system and their developing child. There are, however, no guidelines or agreed-upon validated screening measures to assess PSPT during the perinatal period. To build a knowledge base to develop future measure(s) of PSPT, we conducted a systematic review to understand how and when PSPT has been measured during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Searches were run in July 2021 on the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE (In‐Process &amp; Other Non‐Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE 1946 to Present), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to present), Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane. Updated searches and reference searching/snow-balling were conducted in September 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>The search strategy included all appropriate controlled vocabulary and keywords for psychological trauma and pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent researchers screened abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts of abstracts for appropriateness, with conflicts resolved via a third independent reviewer. A secondary analysis was performed on studies measuring PSPT during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 576 studies examining psychological trauma in pregnancy, only 15.8% (n=91) had a measure of PSPT. Of these 91 studies, 53 used a measure designed by the research team to assess PSPT. Critically, none of the measurements used screened for PSPT comprehensively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It is time to screen for and study PSPT in all perinatal individuals. Recognition of PSPT should promote trauma-informed care delivery by obstetrics and neonatology/pediatric teams during the perinatal period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Psychological trauma negatively impacts maternal and infant health during the perinatal period. A history of traumatic experiences related to previous pregnancies and births (termed pregnancy-specific psychological trauma or PSPT) increases the risk of a host of psychological disorders. It can impede women's/the pregnant individual's relationship with the healthcare system and their developing child. There are, however, no guidelines or agreed-upon validated screening measures to assess PSPT during the perinatal period. To build a knowledge base to develop future measure(s) of PSPT, we conducted a systematic review to understand how and when PSPT has been measured during pregnancy.

Data sources

Searches were run in July 2021 on the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE (In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE 1946 to Present), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to present), Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane. Updated searches and reference searching/snow-balling were conducted in September 2023.

Study eligibility criteria

The search strategy included all appropriate controlled vocabulary and keywords for psychological trauma and pregnancy.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent researchers screened abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts of abstracts for appropriateness, with conflicts resolved via a third independent reviewer. A secondary analysis was performed on studies measuring PSPT during pregnancy.

Results

Of the 576 studies examining psychological trauma in pregnancy, only 15.8% (n=91) had a measure of PSPT. Of these 91 studies, 53 used a measure designed by the research team to assess PSPT. Critically, none of the measurements used screened for PSPT comprehensively.

Conclusion

It is time to screen for and study PSPT in all perinatal individuals. Recognition of PSPT should promote trauma-informed care delivery by obstetrics and neonatology/pediatric teams during the perinatal period.
对妊娠期特定心理创伤评估的系统回顾:行动呼吁
目的围生期心理创伤对母婴健康有负面影响。与以前怀孕和分娩相关的创伤经历史(称为妊娠特异性心理创伤或PSPT)增加了许多心理障碍的风险。它可能会阻碍妇女/孕妇与医疗保健系统及其发育中的孩子的关系。然而,没有指导方针或商定的有效的筛查措施,以评估围产期PSPT。为了建立一个知识库来开发未来的PSPT测量方法,我们进行了一项系统的综述来了解妊娠期间PSPT是如何以及何时测量的。数据源搜索于2021年7月在以下数据库上运行:Ovid MEDLINE (in‐Process &;其他非索引引文和Ovid MEDLINE(1946年至今),Ovid EMBASE(1974年至今),Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo和Cochrane。在2023年9月进行了更新查册和参考资料查册/滚雪球式查册。检索策略包括所有合适的心理创伤和妊娠相关的控制词汇和关键词。方法本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。两名独立研究人员筛选摘要,随后对摘要全文进行适当性筛选,冲突通过第三名独立审稿人解决。对妊娠期间PSPT测量的研究进行了二次分析。结果在576项调查妊娠期心理创伤的研究中,仅有15.8% (n=91)有PSPT测量。在这91项研究中,53项使用了研究小组设计的评估PSPT的方法。关键的是,没有一种测量方法可以全面筛查PSPT。结论对围产儿进行PSPT筛查和研究是必要的。认识到PSPT应促进创伤知情护理提供产科和新生儿/儿科团队在围产期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信