Improved MPPT of solar PV Systems under different Environmental conditions utilizes a Novel Hybrid PSO

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Zain Yousaf , Mohsin Ali Koondhar , Zaki A. Zaki , Emad M. Ahmed , Zuhair Muhammed Alaas , Ibrahim Mahariq , Josep M. Guerrero
{"title":"Improved MPPT of solar PV Systems under different Environmental conditions utilizes a Novel Hybrid PSO","authors":"Muhammad Zain Yousaf ,&nbsp;Mohsin Ali Koondhar ,&nbsp;Zaki A. Zaki ,&nbsp;Emad M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Zuhair Muhammed Alaas ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Mahariq ,&nbsp;Josep M. Guerrero","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2025.122709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Partial shading conditions (PSCs) and their negative impact on photovoltaic system (PVS) performance have been well studied over past decade. This has prompted researchers to explore methods to reduce impact of PV shading. In this study comparison between ant colony optimization (ACO), grey wolf optimization (GWO), cuckoo search (CS), perturb and observe (P&amp;O) algorithm, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms with hybrid PSO (HPSO) have been investigated under PSC and without PSC. One of ultimate and desired evolutionary research techniques is PSO, which bestow excessive tracking speeds (TS) and has capacity to operate under varying environmental conditions. Many mitigations and enhancements have been made in recent lifespan to address the usual defects traditional PSO techniques. This paper presents a comparative analysis of six parameters as irradiance, PV current, buck boost current, PV voltage, bus voltage, power using different algorithms with respect to hybrid PSO (HPSO). However, the HSPO is a faster convergence rate than the PSO-based MPPT method. At different PSC the 27 % efficiency of PVS is achieved using HPSO. It is concluded that the HPSO is superior to other algorithm due to tracking performance, computational overhead decreases, reduction of search space, reduced oscillation, reduction of search space, and tracking efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 122709"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125003714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partial shading conditions (PSCs) and their negative impact on photovoltaic system (PVS) performance have been well studied over past decade. This has prompted researchers to explore methods to reduce impact of PV shading. In this study comparison between ant colony optimization (ACO), grey wolf optimization (GWO), cuckoo search (CS), perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms with hybrid PSO (HPSO) have been investigated under PSC and without PSC. One of ultimate and desired evolutionary research techniques is PSO, which bestow excessive tracking speeds (TS) and has capacity to operate under varying environmental conditions. Many mitigations and enhancements have been made in recent lifespan to address the usual defects traditional PSO techniques. This paper presents a comparative analysis of six parameters as irradiance, PV current, buck boost current, PV voltage, bus voltage, power using different algorithms with respect to hybrid PSO (HPSO). However, the HSPO is a faster convergence rate than the PSO-based MPPT method. At different PSC the 27 % efficiency of PVS is achieved using HPSO. It is concluded that the HPSO is superior to other algorithm due to tracking performance, computational overhead decreases, reduction of search space, reduced oscillation, reduction of search space, and tracking efficiency.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信