Effects of attending workshops and using complementary material for home training on the learning of surgical knots by general surgery residents

Q2 Social Sciences
Salvador Montoya-Alvarez , Diana Laura García-Carrera , Nadia Sarahí Hernández-Domínguez , Darling Patricia Ortiz-Guzmán , Johan Saul Pérez-Rea , Jesús Tapia-Jurado , Dalia Danely Méndez-Gómez , José Rafael Rodríguez-Bonaparte
{"title":"Effects of attending workshops and using complementary material for home training on the learning of surgical knots by general surgery residents","authors":"Salvador Montoya-Alvarez ,&nbsp;Diana Laura García-Carrera ,&nbsp;Nadia Sarahí Hernández-Domínguez ,&nbsp;Darling Patricia Ortiz-Guzmán ,&nbsp;Johan Saul Pérez-Rea ,&nbsp;Jesús Tapia-Jurado ,&nbsp;Dalia Danely Méndez-Gómez ,&nbsp;José Rafael Rodríguez-Bonaparte","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the medical field, specifically in surgical specialties, the knot is crucial for suturing tissues or organs, allowing wounds to heal. This study aims to evaluate the effect of having access to different learning tools for continuous practice on learning basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A surgical knots workshop was held, and a prospective randomized controlled trial (RTC) was performed. General surgery residents who assisted in the workshop and accepted to participate in the study were divided into two intervention groups (Groups A and B) groups through the block randomization technique. A control group (Group C) was formed with General surgery residents not assisting the workshop. Group A continued their residency activities, participated in the knot workshop, and received complementary teaching material for home training. Group B continued their residency activities and participated in the knot workshop. Group C simply continued their residency activities. The three groups were evaluated with the OSATS scale and a procedure-specific checklist before and after the knot workshop to assess and compare proficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Paired hypothesis testing showed that all groups significantly increased their skills over the study period. Unpaired hypothesis testing indicated that, although all groups showed improvements, Group A obtained statistically higher scores than Groups B and C on the post-training evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Access to complementary teaching material, in addition to residency activities and workshops, is an important support for surgeons' training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 101024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the medical field, specifically in surgical specialties, the knot is crucial for suturing tissues or organs, allowing wounds to heal. This study aims to evaluate the effect of having access to different learning tools for continuous practice on learning basic surgical skills.

Materials and methods

A surgical knots workshop was held, and a prospective randomized controlled trial (RTC) was performed. General surgery residents who assisted in the workshop and accepted to participate in the study were divided into two intervention groups (Groups A and B) groups through the block randomization technique. A control group (Group C) was formed with General surgery residents not assisting the workshop. Group A continued their residency activities, participated in the knot workshop, and received complementary teaching material for home training. Group B continued their residency activities and participated in the knot workshop. Group C simply continued their residency activities. The three groups were evaluated with the OSATS scale and a procedure-specific checklist before and after the knot workshop to assess and compare proficiency.

Results

Paired hypothesis testing showed that all groups significantly increased their skills over the study period. Unpaired hypothesis testing indicated that, although all groups showed improvements, Group A obtained statistically higher scores than Groups B and C on the post-training evaluations.

Conclusion

Access to complementary teaching material, in addition to residency activities and workshops, is an important support for surgeons' training.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信