Effects of attending workshops and using complementary material for home training on the learning of surgical knots by general surgery residents

Q2 Social Sciences
Salvador Montoya-Alvarez , Diana Laura García-Carrera , Nadia Sarahí Hernández-Domínguez , Darling Patricia Ortiz-Guzmán , Johan Saul Pérez-Rea , Jesús Tapia-Jurado , Dalia Danely Méndez-Gómez , José Rafael Rodríguez-Bonaparte
{"title":"Effects of attending workshops and using complementary material for home training on the learning of surgical knots by general surgery residents","authors":"Salvador Montoya-Alvarez ,&nbsp;Diana Laura García-Carrera ,&nbsp;Nadia Sarahí Hernández-Domínguez ,&nbsp;Darling Patricia Ortiz-Guzmán ,&nbsp;Johan Saul Pérez-Rea ,&nbsp;Jesús Tapia-Jurado ,&nbsp;Dalia Danely Méndez-Gómez ,&nbsp;José Rafael Rodríguez-Bonaparte","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the medical field, specifically in surgical specialties, the knot is crucial for suturing tissues or organs, allowing wounds to heal. This study aims to evaluate the effect of having access to different learning tools for continuous practice on learning basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A surgical knots workshop was held, and a prospective randomized controlled trial (RTC) was performed. General surgery residents who assisted in the workshop and accepted to participate in the study were divided into two intervention groups (Groups A and B) groups through the block randomization technique. A control group (Group C) was formed with General surgery residents not assisting the workshop. Group A continued their residency activities, participated in the knot workshop, and received complementary teaching material for home training. Group B continued their residency activities and participated in the knot workshop. Group C simply continued their residency activities. The three groups were evaluated with the OSATS scale and a procedure-specific checklist before and after the knot workshop to assess and compare proficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Paired hypothesis testing showed that all groups significantly increased their skills over the study period. Unpaired hypothesis testing indicated that, although all groups showed improvements, Group A obtained statistically higher scores than Groups B and C on the post-training evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Access to complementary teaching material, in addition to residency activities and workshops, is an important support for surgeons' training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 101024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the medical field, specifically in surgical specialties, the knot is crucial for suturing tissues or organs, allowing wounds to heal. This study aims to evaluate the effect of having access to different learning tools for continuous practice on learning basic surgical skills.

Materials and methods

A surgical knots workshop was held, and a prospective randomized controlled trial (RTC) was performed. General surgery residents who assisted in the workshop and accepted to participate in the study were divided into two intervention groups (Groups A and B) groups through the block randomization technique. A control group (Group C) was formed with General surgery residents not assisting the workshop. Group A continued their residency activities, participated in the knot workshop, and received complementary teaching material for home training. Group B continued their residency activities and participated in the knot workshop. Group C simply continued their residency activities. The three groups were evaluated with the OSATS scale and a procedure-specific checklist before and after the knot workshop to assess and compare proficiency.

Results

Paired hypothesis testing showed that all groups significantly increased their skills over the study period. Unpaired hypothesis testing indicated that, although all groups showed improvements, Group A obtained statistically higher scores than Groups B and C on the post-training evaluations.

Conclusion

Access to complementary teaching material, in addition to residency activities and workshops, is an important support for surgeons' training.
参加工作坊和使用补充材料进行家庭培训对普通外科住院医师学习外科结的影响
在医学领域,特别是在外科专业,绳结对于缝合组织或器官,使伤口愈合至关重要。本研究旨在评估使用不同的学习工具进行持续练习对学习基本手术技能的影响。材料与方法举办外科结研讨会,并进行前瞻性随机对照试验(RTC)。通过块随机化技术将参与工作坊并接受参与研究的普外科住院医师分为干预组A组和干预组B组。对照组(C组)由普通外科住院医师组成,不协助车间。A组继续他们的驻留活动,参加结工作坊,并获得家庭培训的补充教材。B组继续他们的驻留活动,并参与结工作坊。C组只是继续他们的居住活动。在打结研讨会之前和之后,用OSATS量表和程序特定检查表对三组进行评估,以评估和比较熟练程度。结果西班牙的假设检验表明,在研究期间,所有小组的技能都有显著提高。非配对假设检验表明,尽管所有组都有改善,但A组在训练后评估中获得的分数在统计学上高于B组和C组。结论除了住院医师活动和研讨会外,获得补充教材是外科医生培训的重要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信