Validation of Deep Learning–Based Automatic Retinal Layer Segmentation Algorithms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration with 2 Spectral-Domain OCT Devices

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Souvick Mukherjee PhD , Tharindu De Silva PhD , Cameron Duic BS , Gopal Jayakar BS , Tiarnan D.L. Keenan BM BCh, PhD , Alisa T. Thavikulwat MD , Emily Chew MD , Catherine Cukras MD, PhD
{"title":"Validation of Deep Learning–Based Automatic Retinal Layer Segmentation Algorithms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration with 2 Spectral-Domain OCT Devices","authors":"Souvick Mukherjee PhD ,&nbsp;Tharindu De Silva PhD ,&nbsp;Cameron Duic BS ,&nbsp;Gopal Jayakar BS ,&nbsp;Tiarnan D.L. Keenan BM BCh, PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa T. Thavikulwat MD ,&nbsp;Emily Chew MD ,&nbsp;Catherine Cukras MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Segmentations of retinal layers in spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) images serve as a crucial tool for identifying and analyzing the progression of various retinal diseases, encompassing a broad spectrum of abnormalities associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The training of deep learning algorithms necessitates well-defined ground truth labels, validated by experts, to delineate boundaries accurately. However, this resource-intensive process has constrained the widespread application of such algorithms across diverse OCT devices. This work validates deep learning image segmentation models across multiple OCT devices by testing robustness in generating clinically relevant metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective comparative study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Adults &gt;50 years of age with no AMD to advanced AMD, as defined in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, in ≥1 eye, were enrolled. Four hundred two SD-OCT scans were used in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluate 2 separate state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms through a training process using images obtained from 1 OCT device (Heidelberg-Spectralis) and subsequent testing using images acquired from 2 OCT devices (Heidelberg-Spectralis and Zeiss-Cirrus). This assessment is performed on a dataset that encompasses a range of retinal pathologies, spanning from disease-free conditions to severe forms of AMD, with a focus on evaluating the device independence of the algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Performance metrics (including mean squared error, mean absolute error [MAE], and Dice coefficients) for the segmentations of the internal limiting membrane (ILM), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and RPE to Bruch’s membrane region, along with en face thickness maps, volumetric estimations (in mm<sup>3</sup>). Violin plots and Bland–Altman plots comparing predictions against ground truth are also presented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The UNet and DeepLabv3, trained on Spectralis B-scans, demonstrate clinically useful outcomes when applied to Cirrus test B-scans. Review of the Cirrus test data by 2 independent annotators revealed that the aggregated MAE in pixels for ILM was 1.82 ± 0.24 (equivalent to 7.0 ± 0.9 μm) and for RPE was 2.46 ± 0.66 (9.5 ± 2.6 μm). Additionally, the Dice similarity coefficient for the RPE drusen complex region, comparing predictions to ground truth, reached 0.87 ± 0.01.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the pursuit of task-specific goals such as retinal layer segmentation, a segmentation network has the capacity to acquire domain-independent features from a large training dataset. This enables the utilization of the network to execute tasks in domains where ground truth is hard to generate.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524002069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Segmentations of retinal layers in spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) images serve as a crucial tool for identifying and analyzing the progression of various retinal diseases, encompassing a broad spectrum of abnormalities associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The training of deep learning algorithms necessitates well-defined ground truth labels, validated by experts, to delineate boundaries accurately. However, this resource-intensive process has constrained the widespread application of such algorithms across diverse OCT devices. This work validates deep learning image segmentation models across multiple OCT devices by testing robustness in generating clinically relevant metrics.

Design

Prospective comparative study.

Participants

Adults >50 years of age with no AMD to advanced AMD, as defined in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, in ≥1 eye, were enrolled. Four hundred two SD-OCT scans were used in this study.

Methods

We evaluate 2 separate state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms through a training process using images obtained from 1 OCT device (Heidelberg-Spectralis) and subsequent testing using images acquired from 2 OCT devices (Heidelberg-Spectralis and Zeiss-Cirrus). This assessment is performed on a dataset that encompasses a range of retinal pathologies, spanning from disease-free conditions to severe forms of AMD, with a focus on evaluating the device independence of the algorithms.

Main Outcome Measures

Performance metrics (including mean squared error, mean absolute error [MAE], and Dice coefficients) for the segmentations of the internal limiting membrane (ILM), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and RPE to Bruch’s membrane region, along with en face thickness maps, volumetric estimations (in mm3). Violin plots and Bland–Altman plots comparing predictions against ground truth are also presented.

Results

The UNet and DeepLabv3, trained on Spectralis B-scans, demonstrate clinically useful outcomes when applied to Cirrus test B-scans. Review of the Cirrus test data by 2 independent annotators revealed that the aggregated MAE in pixels for ILM was 1.82 ± 0.24 (equivalent to 7.0 ± 0.9 μm) and for RPE was 2.46 ± 0.66 (9.5 ± 2.6 μm). Additionally, the Dice similarity coefficient for the RPE drusen complex region, comparing predictions to ground truth, reached 0.87 ± 0.01.

Conclusions

In the pursuit of task-specific goals such as retinal layer segmentation, a segmentation network has the capacity to acquire domain-independent features from a large training dataset. This enables the utilization of the network to execute tasks in domains where ground truth is hard to generate.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
基于深度学习的视网膜层自动分割算法在年龄相关性黄斑变性中的应用
目的:光谱域OCT (SD-OCT)图像中视网膜层的分割是识别和分析各种视网膜疾病进展的重要工具,包括与年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)相关的广泛异常。深度学习算法的训练需要经过专家验证的定义良好的基础真值标签,以准确地描绘边界。然而,这种资源密集型的过程限制了这种算法在不同OCT设备上的广泛应用。这项工作通过测试生成临床相关指标的鲁棒性,验证了跨多个OCT设备的深度学习图像分割模型。前瞻性比较研究。受试者:年龄≥1只眼,年龄≥50岁,无AMD至晚期AMD(年龄相关眼病研究中定义)。在这项研究中使用了四百二张SD-OCT扫描。方法我们通过使用从一台OCT设备(Heidelberg-Spectralis)获得的图像进行训练,并随后使用从两台OCT设备(Heidelberg-Spectralis和蔡司- cirrus)获得的图像进行测试,评估了两种独立的最先进的分割算法。该评估是在一个数据集上进行的,该数据集包含了一系列视网膜病变,从无病状态到严重形式的AMD,重点是评估算法的设备独立性。主要结果测量内限定膜(ILM)、视网膜色素上皮(RPE)和RPE到Bruch膜区域的分割的性能指标(包括均方误差、平均绝对误差[MAE]和Dice系数),以及面部厚度图、体积估计(以mm3为单位)。小提琴情节和布兰德-奥特曼情节比较预测与实际事实也提出。UNet和DeepLabv3经过Spectralis b扫描的训练,在应用于Cirrus测试b扫描时显示出临床有用的结果。两名独立注释者对Cirrus测试数据的回顾显示,ILM的聚合MAE为1.82±0.24(相当于7.0±0.9 μm), RPE的聚合MAE为2.46±0.66(9.5±2.6 μm)。此外,RPE dren复杂区域的Dice相似系数,将预测结果与实际情况进行比较,达到0.87±0.01。结论在追求特定任务的目标,如视网膜层分割,分割网络有能力从一个大的训练数据集中获得领域无关的特征。这使得利用网络在难以生成真实值的领域执行任务成为可能。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信