Study on the application of discrepancy-guided symbolic regression algorithm in analyzing the impact resistance of UHP-SFRC target against high velocity projectile impact
{"title":"Study on the application of discrepancy-guided symbolic regression algorithm in analyzing the impact resistance of UHP-SFRC target against high velocity projectile impact","authors":"Delei Zou , Dilyar Thoti , Zhihui Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately predicting the depth of penetration (DOP) values for ultra-high-performance steel fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-SFRC) targets under high-velocity projectile impact (HVPI) is crucial to assess damage patterns and maintain the integrity of protective structures. However, traditional empirical formulas often fall short, resulting in significant underestimations. To address these inaccuracies and inefficiencies, this study establishes a discrepancy-guided, H2O Auto-ML-assisted Offspring Selection Genetic Programming-Symbolic Regression (OSGP-SR) algorithm to rectify traditional empirical formulas and markedly improve the accuracy and robustness of DOP predictions. Four widely used empirical formulations for predicting DOP in traditional reinforced concrete structures, i.e., BRL, NDRC, ACE, and AW were selected as optimization objectives. A dataset comprising 265 samples of UHP-SFRC targets subjected to HVPI was created for verification and analysis. An examination of the prediction deviations in the original formulations informed an optimization strategy based on discrepancy-guided analysis. Moreover, the identification of key feature variables was conducted through feature contribution screening, and the proposed algorithm based on discrepancy-guided was utilized to refine the existing formulas. Results indicate that the modified NDRC model achieves the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), while the BRL model excels in comprehensive evaluation, maintaining accuracy regardless of coarse aggregate presence. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) for engineering applications is provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 105276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurately predicting the depth of penetration (DOP) values for ultra-high-performance steel fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-SFRC) targets under high-velocity projectile impact (HVPI) is crucial to assess damage patterns and maintain the integrity of protective structures. However, traditional empirical formulas often fall short, resulting in significant underestimations. To address these inaccuracies and inefficiencies, this study establishes a discrepancy-guided, H2O Auto-ML-assisted Offspring Selection Genetic Programming-Symbolic Regression (OSGP-SR) algorithm to rectify traditional empirical formulas and markedly improve the accuracy and robustness of DOP predictions. Four widely used empirical formulations for predicting DOP in traditional reinforced concrete structures, i.e., BRL, NDRC, ACE, and AW were selected as optimization objectives. A dataset comprising 265 samples of UHP-SFRC targets subjected to HVPI was created for verification and analysis. An examination of the prediction deviations in the original formulations informed an optimization strategy based on discrepancy-guided analysis. Moreover, the identification of key feature variables was conducted through feature contribution screening, and the proposed algorithm based on discrepancy-guided was utilized to refine the existing formulas. Results indicate that the modified NDRC model achieves the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), while the BRL model excels in comprehensive evaluation, maintaining accuracy regardless of coarse aggregate presence. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) for engineering applications is provided.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them:
-Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading
-Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading
-Terminal ballistics
-Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture
-Stress waves
-Structural crashworthiness
-High-rate mechanical and forming processes
-Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications