Study on the application of discrepancy-guided symbolic regression algorithm in analyzing the impact resistance of UHP-SFRC target against high velocity projectile impact

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Delei Zou , Dilyar Thoti , Zhihui Bao
{"title":"Study on the application of discrepancy-guided symbolic regression algorithm in analyzing the impact resistance of UHP-SFRC target against high velocity projectile impact","authors":"Delei Zou ,&nbsp;Dilyar Thoti ,&nbsp;Zhihui Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately predicting the depth of penetration (DOP) values for ultra-high-performance steel fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-SFRC) targets under high-velocity projectile impact (HVPI) is crucial to assess damage patterns and maintain the integrity of protective structures. However, traditional empirical formulas often fall short, resulting in significant underestimations. To address these inaccuracies and inefficiencies, this study establishes a discrepancy-guided, H2O Auto-ML-assisted Offspring Selection Genetic Programming-Symbolic Regression (OSGP-SR) algorithm to rectify traditional empirical formulas and markedly improve the accuracy and robustness of DOP predictions. Four widely used empirical formulations for predicting DOP in traditional reinforced concrete structures, i.e., BRL, NDRC, ACE, and AW were selected as optimization objectives. A dataset comprising 265 samples of UHP-SFRC targets subjected to HVPI was created for verification and analysis. An examination of the prediction deviations in the original formulations informed an optimization strategy based on discrepancy-guided analysis. Moreover, the identification of key feature variables was conducted through feature contribution screening, and the proposed algorithm based on discrepancy-guided was utilized to refine the existing formulas. Results indicate that the modified NDRC model achieves the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), while the BRL model excels in comprehensive evaluation, maintaining accuracy regardless of coarse aggregate presence. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) for engineering applications is provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 105276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately predicting the depth of penetration (DOP) values for ultra-high-performance steel fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-SFRC) targets under high-velocity projectile impact (HVPI) is crucial to assess damage patterns and maintain the integrity of protective structures. However, traditional empirical formulas often fall short, resulting in significant underestimations. To address these inaccuracies and inefficiencies, this study establishes a discrepancy-guided, H2O Auto-ML-assisted Offspring Selection Genetic Programming-Symbolic Regression (OSGP-SR) algorithm to rectify traditional empirical formulas and markedly improve the accuracy and robustness of DOP predictions. Four widely used empirical formulations for predicting DOP in traditional reinforced concrete structures, i.e., BRL, NDRC, ACE, and AW were selected as optimization objectives. A dataset comprising 265 samples of UHP-SFRC targets subjected to HVPI was created for verification and analysis. An examination of the prediction deviations in the original formulations informed an optimization strategy based on discrepancy-guided analysis. Moreover, the identification of key feature variables was conducted through feature contribution screening, and the proposed algorithm based on discrepancy-guided was utilized to refine the existing formulas. Results indicate that the modified NDRC model achieves the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), while the BRL model excels in comprehensive evaluation, maintaining accuracy regardless of coarse aggregate presence. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) for engineering applications is provided.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信