Environmental assessment of xylitol production routes for thermal energy storage applications: A critical review

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Humberto Santos, Silvia Guillen-Lambea
{"title":"Environmental assessment of xylitol production routes for thermal energy storage applications: A critical review","authors":"Humberto Santos,&nbsp;Silvia Guillen-Lambea","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies show xylitol as a promising material for thermal energy storage applications. This work aims to critically review, collect, and produce useful data about the life cycle impacts of xylitol's production. One of the practical implications of this work is that it allows the identification of inputs that require attention in decision-making according to various environmental impact indicators. The methodology included a review of the production pathways and market, a systematic review, and a life cycle assessment comparing the production routes. The systematic review showed great variability in the global warming potential regardless of the production pathway, biotechnological or chemical, associated with life cycle assessment assumptions, making a fair comparison between both production processes unfeasible. Thus, a life cycle assessment was conducted with the same assumptions for farming, transportation, and manufacturing stages, finalizing with a local sensitivity analysis to identify the critical inputs. Manufacturing in the chemical process contributes to more than 75 % of the environmental impacts compared to farming and transportation, except for water consumption potential (m<sup>3</sup>). A breakdown of the manufacturing flows shows that energy usage for the biotechnological process, and energy plus nickel catalyst for the chemical process are the key contributors, confirmed by the local sensitivity analysis. Overall, the biotechnological process showed a global warming potential of 2.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq per kg of xylitol. In comparison, the chemical process had a value of 8.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq per kg of xylitol, and the same behavior is observed on most of the impact category indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115532"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125002059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies show xylitol as a promising material for thermal energy storage applications. This work aims to critically review, collect, and produce useful data about the life cycle impacts of xylitol's production. One of the practical implications of this work is that it allows the identification of inputs that require attention in decision-making according to various environmental impact indicators. The methodology included a review of the production pathways and market, a systematic review, and a life cycle assessment comparing the production routes. The systematic review showed great variability in the global warming potential regardless of the production pathway, biotechnological or chemical, associated with life cycle assessment assumptions, making a fair comparison between both production processes unfeasible. Thus, a life cycle assessment was conducted with the same assumptions for farming, transportation, and manufacturing stages, finalizing with a local sensitivity analysis to identify the critical inputs. Manufacturing in the chemical process contributes to more than 75 % of the environmental impacts compared to farming and transportation, except for water consumption potential (m3). A breakdown of the manufacturing flows shows that energy usage for the biotechnological process, and energy plus nickel catalyst for the chemical process are the key contributors, confirmed by the local sensitivity analysis. Overall, the biotechnological process showed a global warming potential of 2.2 kg CO2 eq per kg of xylitol. In comparison, the chemical process had a value of 8.8 kg CO2 eq per kg of xylitol, and the same behavior is observed on most of the impact category indicators.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信