Achievement goal profiles and reading-related outcomes in elementary students with and without reading difficulties

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Eunsoo Cho , Unhee Ju , Eun Ha Kim , Donald L. Compton
{"title":"Achievement goal profiles and reading-related outcomes in elementary students with and without reading difficulties","authors":"Eunsoo Cho ,&nbsp;Unhee Ju ,&nbsp;Eun Ha Kim ,&nbsp;Donald L. Compton","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored (a) achievement goal profiles among fifth-grade students, (b) whether reading difficulty (RD) status is predictive of achievement goal profiles, and (c) how different achievement goal profiles relate to achievement, motivation, and behavioral engagement in reading. Three profiles among fifth graders with RDs (<em>n</em> = 138) and typical readers (<em>n</em> = 109) emerged through the factor mixture model, with the <em>High Mastery</em> profile (46 %) being the most prevalent, followed by the <em>High All</em> profile (35 %) and the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile (19 %). Students with RDs were twice as likely to be in the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile as in the <em>High Mastery</em> profile. Results underscore the potentially deleterious effects of performance-avoidance and -approach goals. The <em>High Mastery</em> profile had better reading comprehension than the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile and better behavioral engagement than the <em>High All</em> profile. Such patterns were held when the outcomes were compared within the RD group.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implication</h3><div>This study examined the achievement goals of upper elementary students, the unique goal profile for those facing reading difficulties, and their impact on reading-related outcomes. The findings reveal that most students possess mastery goals, albeit with varying degrees of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Notably, students with reading difficulties are more inclined toward having both mastery and performance-avoidance goals, the profile associated with poorer reading comprehension outcomes. Furthermore, students with multiple goals exhibit lower behavioral engagement in class compared to those predominantly focused on mastery goals. These results underscore the potential negative impact of performance goals on reading-related outcomes and the critical need for creating learning environments that discourage social comparisons and competitive dynamics, which can foster performance-oriented goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000378","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored (a) achievement goal profiles among fifth-grade students, (b) whether reading difficulty (RD) status is predictive of achievement goal profiles, and (c) how different achievement goal profiles relate to achievement, motivation, and behavioral engagement in reading. Three profiles among fifth graders with RDs (n = 138) and typical readers (n = 109) emerged through the factor mixture model, with the High Mastery profile (46 %) being the most prevalent, followed by the High All profile (35 %) and the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile (19 %). Students with RDs were twice as likely to be in the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile as in the High Mastery profile. Results underscore the potentially deleterious effects of performance-avoidance and -approach goals. The High Mastery profile had better reading comprehension than the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile and better behavioral engagement than the High All profile. Such patterns were held when the outcomes were compared within the RD group.

Educational relevance and implication

This study examined the achievement goals of upper elementary students, the unique goal profile for those facing reading difficulties, and their impact on reading-related outcomes. The findings reveal that most students possess mastery goals, albeit with varying degrees of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Notably, students with reading difficulties are more inclined toward having both mastery and performance-avoidance goals, the profile associated with poorer reading comprehension outcomes. Furthermore, students with multiple goals exhibit lower behavioral engagement in class compared to those predominantly focused on mastery goals. These results underscore the potential negative impact of performance goals on reading-related outcomes and the critical need for creating learning environments that discourage social comparisons and competitive dynamics, which can foster performance-oriented goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信