Saya Dennis, Takahiro Tsukioki, Masha Kocherginsky, Andrea Keya Qi, Sarah DeHorn, Michael Gurley, Erica Wrubel, Yuan Luo, Seema Ahsan Khan
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and genetic susceptibility in recently parous women with breast cancer.","authors":"Saya Dennis, Takahiro Tsukioki, Masha Kocherginsky, Andrea Keya Qi, Sarah DeHorn, Michael Gurley, Erica Wrubel, Yuan Luo, Seema Ahsan Khan","doi":"10.1101/2025.02.13.25322229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women with recent parity are at increased short-term breast cancer (BC) risk and face a worse prognosis. The effect of parity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unstudied, and the influence of inherited susceptibility on parity-related short-term risk remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-cohort study among women aged ≤50 with non-metastatic BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 who underwent genetic testing and were treated at Northwestern Medicine. Associations between NAC response and recency of parity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression, stratified by tumor biologic subtypes. Relationships between germline mutations, recency of parity, and BC were explored via multi-state modeling and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,080 eligible women, 231 received NAC. Treatment response was poorer in parous women with triple negative tumors compared to nullipara, regardless of the recency of parity ( <i>P</i> <0.03). Among 122 women (11.3%) with detectable pathogenic mutations, adjusted analyses with both modeling approaches revealed no indications that <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers had an increased hazard of BC diagnosis in the decade following recent parity, compared to nulliparous mutation carriers. For <i>BRCA2</i> and <i>PALB2</i> carriers, breast cancer diagnosis occurred less frequently in the post-partum intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a poor response to NAC in parous TNBC patients compared to nullipara; effects of immunotherapy-based regimens deserve evaluation in the context of parity. Post-partum BC occurrence is not increased in <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers; effects of rarer susceptibility genes may differ. These important effects of parity on BC in young women and those at genetic risk warrant larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.13.25322229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Women with recent parity are at increased short-term breast cancer (BC) risk and face a worse prognosis. The effect of parity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unstudied, and the influence of inherited susceptibility on parity-related short-term risk remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-cohort study among women aged ≤50 with non-metastatic BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 who underwent genetic testing and were treated at Northwestern Medicine. Associations between NAC response and recency of parity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression, stratified by tumor biologic subtypes. Relationships between germline mutations, recency of parity, and BC were explored via multi-state modeling and linear regression.
Results: Among 1,080 eligible women, 231 received NAC. Treatment response was poorer in parous women with triple negative tumors compared to nullipara, regardless of the recency of parity ( P <0.03). Among 122 women (11.3%) with detectable pathogenic mutations, adjusted analyses with both modeling approaches revealed no indications that BRCA1/2 carriers had an increased hazard of BC diagnosis in the decade following recent parity, compared to nulliparous mutation carriers. For BRCA2 and PALB2 carriers, breast cancer diagnosis occurred less frequently in the post-partum intervals.
Conclusion: We observed a poor response to NAC in parous TNBC patients compared to nullipara; effects of immunotherapy-based regimens deserve evaluation in the context of parity. Post-partum BC occurrence is not increased in BRCA1/2 carriers; effects of rarer susceptibility genes may differ. These important effects of parity on BC in young women and those at genetic risk warrant larger prospective studies.