The prognostic value of preoperative CAD-RADS classification in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery.

Kitae Kim, Byeong A Yoo, Hyun Jung Koo, Hong Rae Kim, Ho Jin Kim, Jae Suk Yoo, Joon Bum Kim, Cheol Hyun Chung, Sung-Ho Jung
{"title":"The prognostic value of preoperative CAD-RADS classification in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery.","authors":"Kitae Kim, Byeong A Yoo, Hyun Jung Koo, Hong Rae Kim, Ho Jin Kim, Jae Suk Yoo, Joon Bum Kim, Cheol Hyun Chung, Sung-Ho Jung","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03358-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the association between preoperative coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, as classified by the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS), and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). A total of 897 patients (452 women; mean age, 66.1 ± 9.3 years) who underwent isolated AVR and preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) between 2004 and 2022 were stratified by the CAD-RADS score. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The CAD-RADS score was 0 in 290 (32%) patients, 1 in 208 (23%), 2 in 255 (29%), 3 in 82 (9%), and 4 in 62 (7%) patients. The rates of all-cause death and MACCE tended to increase in parallel with CAD-RADS score (4%, 10.5%, 8.2%, 18.2%, 28.1% at 5 years and 14.4%, 15.1%, 16.7%, 26.9%, 38.4% at 5 years, both P < 0.001). CAD-RADS score ≥ 3 was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.93) and MACCE (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.27-2.52) after adjusting for potential confounders. Notably, patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 3 who received medical therapy in addition to coronary angiography (CAG) improved overall survival compared to those who did not undergo CAG. Preoperative CCTA with CAD-RADS assessment would be useful for screening concomitant CAD and predicting long-term clinical outcomes including all-cause death and MACCE in patients undergoing isolated AVR. For patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 3, it is essential to implement medicinal therapy or intervention along with CAG.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"709-720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03358-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the association between preoperative coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, as classified by the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS), and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). A total of 897 patients (452 women; mean age, 66.1 ± 9.3 years) who underwent isolated AVR and preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) between 2004 and 2022 were stratified by the CAD-RADS score. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The CAD-RADS score was 0 in 290 (32%) patients, 1 in 208 (23%), 2 in 255 (29%), 3 in 82 (9%), and 4 in 62 (7%) patients. The rates of all-cause death and MACCE tended to increase in parallel with CAD-RADS score (4%, 10.5%, 8.2%, 18.2%, 28.1% at 5 years and 14.4%, 15.1%, 16.7%, 26.9%, 38.4% at 5 years, both P < 0.001). CAD-RADS score ≥ 3 was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.93) and MACCE (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.27-2.52) after adjusting for potential confounders. Notably, patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 3 who received medical therapy in addition to coronary angiography (CAG) improved overall survival compared to those who did not undergo CAG. Preoperative CCTA with CAD-RADS assessment would be useful for screening concomitant CAD and predicting long-term clinical outcomes including all-cause death and MACCE in patients undergoing isolated AVR. For patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 3, it is essential to implement medicinal therapy or intervention along with CAG.

术前CAD-RADS分级对孤立主动脉瓣手术患者的预后价值。
研究冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD- rads)分类的术前冠状动脉疾病(CAD)严重程度与孤立主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)患者临床结局之间的关系。共897例患者(452例女性;根据CAD-RADS评分对2004 - 2022年间接受孤立AVR和术前冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)的患者进行分层,平均年龄66.1±9.3岁。关注的结局是全因死亡和主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)。CAD-RADS评分290例(32%)患者为0分,208例(23%)患者为1分,255例(29%)患者为2分,82例(9%)患者为3分,62例(7%)患者为4分。全因死亡率和MACCE倾向于与CAD-RADS评分平行增加(5年时分别为4%、10.5%、8.2%、18.2%、28.1%,5年时分别为14.4%、15.1%、16.7%、26.9%、38.4%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信