Racial-Ethnic Differences in Care Networks of Older Adults: Empirical Exploration of Possible Explanations.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Zhiyong Lin
{"title":"Racial-Ethnic Differences in Care Networks of Older Adults: Empirical Exploration of Possible Explanations.","authors":"Zhiyong Lin","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous research on eldercare among minority populations often highlights the role of values, beliefs, and social expectations, placing greater emphasis on ideational factors than on sociostructural and health factors in explaining racial-ethnic differences in care arrangements. This study aims to describe the extent to which care received by older adults varies by race-ethnicity and to explore possible explanations for these variations using the behavioral model of health care use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were sourced from the 2018 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 and older. Latent class analyses were used to develop a care network typology with combinations of care from different sources. Multinomial regression models assessed various predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with racial-ethnic differences in the distribution of constructed care network types. Formal mediation analysis tested potential mediators of these differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black and Hispanic older adults tended to receive care from children and extended kin caregivers, while White older adults were more likely to receive care from their spouses and perform self-care with assistive technologies. Mediation analyses revealed that racial-ethnic differences in care networks were primarily attributable to enabling factors, including family configurations, social networks, and socioeconomic status. Limited evidence was found for the roles of predisposing factors, measured by care preferences, and need factors, measured by health conditions, in explaining these differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for more research and policy interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by socially disadvantaged older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Previous research on eldercare among minority populations often highlights the role of values, beliefs, and social expectations, placing greater emphasis on ideational factors than on sociostructural and health factors in explaining racial-ethnic differences in care arrangements. This study aims to describe the extent to which care received by older adults varies by race-ethnicity and to explore possible explanations for these variations using the behavioral model of health care use.

Methods: Data were sourced from the 2018 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 and older. Latent class analyses were used to develop a care network typology with combinations of care from different sources. Multinomial regression models assessed various predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with racial-ethnic differences in the distribution of constructed care network types. Formal mediation analysis tested potential mediators of these differences.

Results: Black and Hispanic older adults tended to receive care from children and extended kin caregivers, while White older adults were more likely to receive care from their spouses and perform self-care with assistive technologies. Mediation analyses revealed that racial-ethnic differences in care networks were primarily attributable to enabling factors, including family configurations, social networks, and socioeconomic status. Limited evidence was found for the roles of predisposing factors, measured by care preferences, and need factors, measured by health conditions, in explaining these differences.

Discussion: The findings highlight the need for more research and policy interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by socially disadvantaged older adults.

老年人护理网络的种族-民族差异:可能解释的实证探索。
目的:以往关于少数民族老年人护理的研究往往强调价值观、信仰和社会期望的作用,在解释护理安排中的种族-民族差异时,更强调观念因素,而不是社会结构和健康因素。本研究旨在描述老年人接受的护理在多大程度上因种族而异,并利用医疗保健使用的行为模型探讨这些差异的可能解释。方法:数据来自2018年全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS),这是一项针对68岁及以上医疗保险受益人的全国代表性调查。潜在类别分析用于开发一个护理网络类型与不同来源的护理组合。多项回归模型评估了与构建的护理网络类型分布的种族-民族差异相关的各种易感因素、使能因素和需求因素。正式的中介分析测试了这些差异的潜在中介。结果:黑人和西班牙裔老年人倾向于接受儿童和亲属照顾者的照顾,而白人老年人更倾向于接受配偶的照顾和使用辅助技术进行自我照顾。中介分析显示,护理网络的种族-民族差异主要归因于促成因素,包括家庭结构、社会网络和社会经济地位。在解释这些差异时,通过护理偏好衡量的诱发因素和通过健康状况衡量的需求因素的作用的证据有限。讨论:研究结果强调需要进行更多的研究和政策干预,以解决社会弱势老年人面临的各种挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信