Collaborative Governance Strategies for Fever Clinics: A Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game Analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S497125
Weiqi Huang, Yingxin Wang, Nan Meng, Kexin Wang, Long Yin, Hongyu Li, Qunhong Wu, Huan Liu
{"title":"Collaborative Governance Strategies for Fever Clinics: A Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game Analysis.","authors":"Weiqi Huang, Yingxin Wang, Nan Meng, Kexin Wang, Long Yin, Hongyu Li, Qunhong Wu, Huan Liu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S497125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>China's fever clinics succeeded during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic but revealed operational deficiencies. This study explores multiparty coordination mechanisms in fever clinics to improve collaborative management and efficiency in epidemic control.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A tripartite evolutionary game model was constructed, involving \"primary healthcare institutions-non-primary healthcare institutions-government\" to analyze the evolutionary stable strategies among these entities in different scenarios. We implemented a simulation of evolutionary processes and conducted sensitivity analyses of government subsidies, punishments, and public supervision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four evolutionarily stable strategies were identified: B<sub>4</sub>(0,0,1), B<sub>5</sub>(1,1,0), B<sub>6</sub>(1,0,1), and B<sub>7</sub>(0,1,1). The government gradually tended to be passive in emergency scenarios of the epidemic during the evolution process. Primary and non-primary healthcare institutions chose to participate in the coordinated response for epidemic prevention and control in transition scenarios. In addition, increased government subsidies and punishments resulted in the active participation of primary and non-primary healthcare institutions in the coordinated response for epidemic prevention and control. However, excessive subsidies and punishments led to lenient supervision when they exceeded a certain threshold. Meanwhile, the collaborative participation of non-primary healthcare institutions fluctuates in response to variations in government supervision. Under normal scenarios, public supervision had an obvious effect on driving primary healthcare institutions to participate in coordinated responses for epidemic prevention and control, thereby sharing the role of government supervision to a certain extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Government subsidies and punishments under a certain threshold effectively promoted the participation of primary and non-primary healthcare institutions in pandemic prevention and control. Additionally, participation in public supervision gradually increased with the gradual evolution of the pandemic. Therefore, our results suggested that the government should actively explore reasonable, dynamic thresholds for subsidies and punishments, promote public participation through diversified means, and explore diverse operation types of fever clinics to address the challenges of emerging infectious diseases in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"517-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S497125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: China's fever clinics succeeded during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic but revealed operational deficiencies. This study explores multiparty coordination mechanisms in fever clinics to improve collaborative management and efficiency in epidemic control.

Patients and methods: A tripartite evolutionary game model was constructed, involving "primary healthcare institutions-non-primary healthcare institutions-government" to analyze the evolutionary stable strategies among these entities in different scenarios. We implemented a simulation of evolutionary processes and conducted sensitivity analyses of government subsidies, punishments, and public supervision.

Results: Four evolutionarily stable strategies were identified: B4(0,0,1), B5(1,1,0), B6(1,0,1), and B7(0,1,1). The government gradually tended to be passive in emergency scenarios of the epidemic during the evolution process. Primary and non-primary healthcare institutions chose to participate in the coordinated response for epidemic prevention and control in transition scenarios. In addition, increased government subsidies and punishments resulted in the active participation of primary and non-primary healthcare institutions in the coordinated response for epidemic prevention and control. However, excessive subsidies and punishments led to lenient supervision when they exceeded a certain threshold. Meanwhile, the collaborative participation of non-primary healthcare institutions fluctuates in response to variations in government supervision. Under normal scenarios, public supervision had an obvious effect on driving primary healthcare institutions to participate in coordinated responses for epidemic prevention and control, thereby sharing the role of government supervision to a certain extent.

Conclusion: Government subsidies and punishments under a certain threshold effectively promoted the participation of primary and non-primary healthcare institutions in pandemic prevention and control. Additionally, participation in public supervision gradually increased with the gradual evolution of the pandemic. Therefore, our results suggested that the government should actively explore reasonable, dynamic thresholds for subsidies and punishments, promote public participation through diversified means, and explore diverse operation types of fever clinics to address the challenges of emerging infectious diseases in the future.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信