Optimizing the Host Niche to Fuel Cleft Lip Muscle Regeneration.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Pinting He, Xu Cheng, Qian Shi, Chenghao Li, Bing Shi
{"title":"Optimizing the Host Niche to Fuel Cleft Lip Muscle Regeneration.","authors":"Pinting He, Xu Cheng, Qian Shi, Chenghao Li, Bing Shi","doi":"10.1177/10556656251320758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lip muscle reconstruction is a key strategy for cleft lip repair, but the outcome of muscle regeneration is suboptimal. The lack of relevant models restricts studies on cleft lip muscle regeneration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this study, we developed an animal xenograft model by transplanting muscle samples from patients with cleft lip into different host sites in immunodeficient mice. The grafted muscles were harvested after 1, 2, and 5 months to investigate the temporal dynamics of myofiber growth and maturation. Comparisons were made among muscle biopsies, xenografts in the masseter (MAS) muscle of the mice, and xenografts in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the mice to determine the optimal host niche.</p><p><p>Histological analysis of myofiber number and size, fiber type switching, innervation, and blood supply was performed to evaluate the cleft lip muscle regeneration process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The muscles from cleft lip patients underwent an active degeneration-regeneration cycle. The fiber diameter in the MAS niche was significantly larger than that in the TA niche and was comparable to the fiber diameter of the donor biopsy from which it originated. The innervation and blood supply of the muscle grafts at the MAS host site were also superior to those of the grafts at the TA host site.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MAS muscles of mice provided the most favorable microenvironment for cleft lip muscle regeneration. This patient-centered xenograft model offers a platform for cleft lip muscle regeneration studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251320758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251320758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lip muscle reconstruction is a key strategy for cleft lip repair, but the outcome of muscle regeneration is suboptimal. The lack of relevant models restricts studies on cleft lip muscle regeneration.

Design: In this study, we developed an animal xenograft model by transplanting muscle samples from patients with cleft lip into different host sites in immunodeficient mice. The grafted muscles were harvested after 1, 2, and 5 months to investigate the temporal dynamics of myofiber growth and maturation. Comparisons were made among muscle biopsies, xenografts in the masseter (MAS) muscle of the mice, and xenografts in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the mice to determine the optimal host niche.

Histological analysis of myofiber number and size, fiber type switching, innervation, and blood supply was performed to evaluate the cleft lip muscle regeneration process.

Results: The muscles from cleft lip patients underwent an active degeneration-regeneration cycle. The fiber diameter in the MAS niche was significantly larger than that in the TA niche and was comparable to the fiber diameter of the donor biopsy from which it originated. The innervation and blood supply of the muscle grafts at the MAS host site were also superior to those of the grafts at the TA host site.

Conclusions: The MAS muscles of mice provided the most favorable microenvironment for cleft lip muscle regeneration. This patient-centered xenograft model offers a platform for cleft lip muscle regeneration studies.

优化宿主生态位促进唇裂肌肉再生。
目的:唇肌重建是唇裂修复的关键策略,但其效果并不理想。相关模型的缺乏制约了唇裂肌肉再生的研究。设计:在这项研究中,我们通过将唇裂患者的肌肉样本移植到免疫缺陷小鼠的不同宿主部位,建立了一种动物异种移植模型。移植肌肉在1、2和5个月后切除,以观察肌纤维生长和成熟的时间动态。将肌肉活检、咬肌(MAS)异种移植和胫骨前肌(TA)异种移植进行比较,确定最佳宿主生态位。通过肌纤维数量和大小、纤维类型转换、神经支配和血液供应的组织学分析来评价唇裂肌再生过程。结果:唇裂患者的肌肉呈现活跃的退行-再生循环。MAS生态位的纤维直径明显大于TA生态位的纤维直径,与供体活检组织的纤维直径相当。肌移植物在MAS宿主部位的神经支配和血供也优于TA宿主部位。结论:小鼠MAS肌为唇裂肌再生提供了最有利的微环境。这种以患者为中心的异种移植模型为唇裂肌肉再生研究提供了一个平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信