Negotiating Access to Health and Wellbeing Support in Schools for Young People with Chronic Health Conditions in English Secondary Schools: A Qualitative Multi-Informant Study.

Q2 Social Sciences
Continuity in Education Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cie.149
Lauren Herlitz, Matthew Jay, Claire Powell, Ruth Gilbert, Ruth Blackburn
{"title":"Negotiating Access to Health and Wellbeing Support in Schools for Young People with Chronic Health Conditions in English Secondary Schools: A Qualitative Multi-Informant Study.","authors":"Lauren Herlitz, Matthew Jay, Claire Powell, Ruth Gilbert, Ruth Blackburn","doi":"10.5334/cie.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schools have a statutory duty to support pupils with medical conditions in England, but limited evidence exists on how support is managed in practice. This study explores young people's, caregivers', and school staff's experiences of access to health and wellbeing support in state secondary schools for pupils with chronic health conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used an online qualitative survey design: one for young people or caregivers, and one for staff. Data was analysed using framework analysis, applying candidacy theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve young people, 33 caregivers, and 18 secondary school staff responded to the survey. Participants described highly varied offers of health and wellbeing support, with caregivers and young people often unaware of what support schools could feasibly provide. Participants highlighted communication gaps and a lack of collaborative work between primary or secondary healthcare and schools. Many caregivers and young people reported that staff had insufficient understanding of their condition(s), had not trusted or believed them when they had explained their health needs, or had left them out of conversations about support. School staff also noted communication difficulties with caregivers. Many caregivers and staff described aspects of the secondary school setting that prohibited inclusivity including insufficient staff time, high pupil numbers, a focus on national attainment measures, and attendance targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The support options that young people with chronic conditions can feasibly be offered should be clarified in government guidance. Further research is needed on the prevalence/utility of individual healthcare plans and on procedures to ensure that pupils with medical conditions are justly supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":34069,"journal":{"name":"Continuity in Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"22-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cie.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Schools have a statutory duty to support pupils with medical conditions in England, but limited evidence exists on how support is managed in practice. This study explores young people's, caregivers', and school staff's experiences of access to health and wellbeing support in state secondary schools for pupils with chronic health conditions.

Method: We used an online qualitative survey design: one for young people or caregivers, and one for staff. Data was analysed using framework analysis, applying candidacy theory.

Results: Twelve young people, 33 caregivers, and 18 secondary school staff responded to the survey. Participants described highly varied offers of health and wellbeing support, with caregivers and young people often unaware of what support schools could feasibly provide. Participants highlighted communication gaps and a lack of collaborative work between primary or secondary healthcare and schools. Many caregivers and young people reported that staff had insufficient understanding of their condition(s), had not trusted or believed them when they had explained their health needs, or had left them out of conversations about support. School staff also noted communication difficulties with caregivers. Many caregivers and staff described aspects of the secondary school setting that prohibited inclusivity including insufficient staff time, high pupil numbers, a focus on national attainment measures, and attendance targets.

Conclusion: The support options that young people with chronic conditions can feasibly be offered should be clarified in government guidance. Further research is needed on the prevalence/utility of individual healthcare plans and on procedures to ensure that pupils with medical conditions are justly supported.

英国中学慢性健康问题青少年在学校获得健康和福利支持的谈判:一项多信息质性研究
背景:在英格兰,学校有法定义务为有医疗条件的学生提供支持,但关于如何在实践中管理支持的证据有限。本研究探讨了年轻人、照顾者和学校工作人员在公立中学为患有慢性疾病的学生提供健康和福利支持方面的经验。方法:我们采用在线定性调查设计:一份针对年轻人或照顾者,一份针对工作人员。采用候选理论,采用框架分析法对数据进行分析。结果:12名青少年、33名护理人员和18名中学工作人员参与了调查。与会者描述了各种各样的健康和福利支持,照顾者和年轻人往往不知道学校可以切实提供什么支持。与会者强调了初级或中级保健与学校之间的沟通差距和缺乏协作工作。许多照护者和年轻人报告说,工作人员对他们的情况了解不足,当他们向他们解释自己的健康需求时,工作人员不相信或不相信他们,或者不让他们参与有关支持的谈话。学校工作人员还注意到与照顾者的沟通困难。许多护理人员和工作人员描述了中学环境中禁止包容性的方面,包括工作人员时间不足、学生人数过多、对国家成就措施的关注以及出勤目标。结论:应在政府指导中明确对青少年慢性病患者可行的支持选择。需要进一步研究个人保健计划的普及/效用,以及确保有医疗条件的学生得到公正支持的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Continuity in Education
Continuity in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信