Satisfaction With Teleneurology in Low Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients and Healthcare Providers.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mohammed Farhan Ansari, Deepak Menon, Milu Anna Ittycheria, Sarath Govindaraj, Rehan Shahed, Deenadayalan Boopalan, Rajani Parthasarathy, Girish N Rao, Faheem Arshad, Suvarna Alladi
{"title":"Satisfaction With Teleneurology in Low Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients and Healthcare Providers.","authors":"Mohammed Farhan Ansari, Deepak Menon, Milu Anna Ittycheria, Sarath Govindaraj, Rehan Shahed, Deenadayalan Boopalan, Rajani Parthasarathy, Girish N Rao, Faheem Arshad, Suvarna Alladi","doi":"10.1177/19418744251321552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Teleneurology has become instrumental in extending neurologic care in remote and underserved areas, enhancing access, and potentially improving patient outcomes while reducing costs. This study evaluates the satisfaction of both patients and healthcare providers with teleneurology services for common neurological disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective observational study, 58 patients suffering from headache, epilepsy, stroke, or dementia were recruited through the \"Karnataka Brain Health Initiative.\" Teleconsultations were facilitated via Zoom, incorporating brief neurological examinations. Satisfaction levels were gauged using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) for patients and the Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Monitoring Questionnaire (PPSM) for healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 patients enrolled, 18 had headache, 12 epilepsy, 13 stroke, and 15 dementia, with a mean age of 43.7 years. All completed the TSQ, yielding a mean score of 4.47 ± 0.41. The average teleconsultation lasted 21.21 minutes. The PPSM questionnaire, completed by neurologists for all patients, resulted in a mean score of 4.33 ± 0.44. Of these, 36 consultations initiated by primary care physicians had a PPSM mean score of 4.47 ± 0.51. Agreement on quality of care was 60%, time-saving benefit 98%, and willingness for future use 95%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings indicate high satisfaction among both patients and providers, underscoring the effectiveness of teleneurology in delivering quality care comparable to in-person consultations. The positive feedback from primary care physicians highlights teleneurology's potential as an integral component of healthcare delivery in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744251321552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251321552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Teleneurology has become instrumental in extending neurologic care in remote and underserved areas, enhancing access, and potentially improving patient outcomes while reducing costs. This study evaluates the satisfaction of both patients and healthcare providers with teleneurology services for common neurological disorders.

Methods: In this single-center, prospective observational study, 58 patients suffering from headache, epilepsy, stroke, or dementia were recruited through the "Karnataka Brain Health Initiative." Teleconsultations were facilitated via Zoom, incorporating brief neurological examinations. Satisfaction levels were gauged using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) for patients and the Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Monitoring Questionnaire (PPSM) for healthcare providers.

Results: Of the 58 patients enrolled, 18 had headache, 12 epilepsy, 13 stroke, and 15 dementia, with a mean age of 43.7 years. All completed the TSQ, yielding a mean score of 4.47 ± 0.41. The average teleconsultation lasted 21.21 minutes. The PPSM questionnaire, completed by neurologists for all patients, resulted in a mean score of 4.33 ± 0.44. Of these, 36 consultations initiated by primary care physicians had a PPSM mean score of 4.47 ± 0.51. Agreement on quality of care was 60%, time-saving benefit 98%, and willingness for future use 95%.

Discussion: The findings indicate high satisfaction among both patients and providers, underscoring the effectiveness of teleneurology in delivering quality care comparable to in-person consultations. The positive feedback from primary care physicians highlights teleneurology's potential as an integral component of healthcare delivery in low-resource settings.

低资源环境下远程神经病学满意度:一项患者和医疗保健提供者的横断面研究。
背景和目的:远程神经病学已成为在偏远地区和服务不足地区扩展神经病学护理的工具,增加了可及性,并在降低成本的同时潜在地改善了患者的预后。本研究评估患者和医疗保健提供者对常见神经系统疾病的远程神经病学服务的满意度。方法:在这项单中心前瞻性观察研究中,通过“卡纳塔克邦脑健康倡议”招募了58名患有头痛、癫痫、中风或痴呆的患者。远程会诊通过Zoom进行,包括简短的神经学检查。满意度水平使用远程医疗满意度问卷(TSQ)对患者和患者和医生满意度监测问卷(PPSM)对医疗保健提供者进行测量。结果:入组的58例患者中,18例头痛,12例癫痫,13例中风,15例痴呆,平均年龄43.7岁。所有患者均完成TSQ,平均得分为4.47±0.41。平均远程咨询时间为21.21分钟。所有患者的PPSM问卷由神经科医生完成,平均得分为4.33±0.44。其中,由初级保健医生发起的36次咨询的PPSM平均得分为4.47±0.51。对护理质量的认同为60%,节省时间的益处为98%,未来使用的意愿为95%。讨论:研究结果表明,患者和提供者的满意度都很高,强调了远程神经病学在提供与面对面咨询相当的高质量护理方面的有效性。来自初级保健医生的积极反馈强调了远程神经病学作为低资源环境中医疗保健服务的一个组成部分的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信