[Movable Array of Magnetoencephalography With Optically Pumped Magnetometers Effectively Captures Primary Auditory-Evoked Response Signals in Healthy Populations at Low Altitudes].

Q3 Medicine
Yuan Yuan, Zhengju Chen, Wei Sun, Shiqin Fu, Lin Jin, Jingwei Sheng, Qiujian Meng, Jiangfen Wu, Lei Chen, Haoyang Xing
{"title":"[Movable Array of Magnetoencephalography With Optically Pumped Magnetometers Effectively Captures Primary Auditory-Evoked Response Signals in Healthy Populations at Low Altitudes].","authors":"Yuan Yuan, Zhengju Chen, Wei Sun, Shiqin Fu, Lin Jin, Jingwei Sheng, Qiujian Meng, Jiangfen Wu, Lei Chen, Haoyang Xing","doi":"10.12182/20241160202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of a movable (with the distance between the temporal scalp and the detector being adjustable) array of optically pumped magnetometers for magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) in capturing auditory evoked response signals in healthy subjects living at low altitudes, and to provide a useful technical reference for subsequent exploration of the changes in brain functions in populations living at high altitudes on a long-term basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty healthy subjects living at a low altitude (470 m above sea level) were recruited. The distance between the scalp and the bilateral temporal lobe detector was adjusted, and the subjects' auditory responses in the temporal lobes were recorded at the distances of 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm. For the different distances, the M100 peak signal strength, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and latency were analyzed along with the corresponding auditory source localization maps. A single-factor analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in response signals at varying distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the distance between the scalp and the detector increased, the noise, the signal, and the SNR gradually weakened (<i>P</i><0.001). The noise and signal showed a tendency of linear decline. On the other hand, the SNR reached its maximum at 5 mm and did not show a tendency of linear decline. Latency was not affected by the distance (<i>P</i>=0.72). The results of the auditory stimulus source reconstruction were generally consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the distance between the detector and the scalp is 5 mm, the SNR value is the highest, resulting in high sensitivity and high signal strength. On the other hand, even when the distance between the detector and the scalp reaches 15 mm, the SNR of the OPM-MEG is still higher than 16 dB, which meets the clinical signal acquisition requirements. Furthermore, the auditory stimulus source reconstruction results were generally consistent. Changing the scalp-to-detector distance does not affect the applicability of the source localization results, validating the device's effectiveness in signal acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":39321,"journal":{"name":"四川大学学报(医学版)","volume":"55 6","pages":"1396-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"四川大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12182/20241160202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a movable (with the distance between the temporal scalp and the detector being adjustable) array of optically pumped magnetometers for magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) in capturing auditory evoked response signals in healthy subjects living at low altitudes, and to provide a useful technical reference for subsequent exploration of the changes in brain functions in populations living at high altitudes on a long-term basis.

Methods: Forty healthy subjects living at a low altitude (470 m above sea level) were recruited. The distance between the scalp and the bilateral temporal lobe detector was adjusted, and the subjects' auditory responses in the temporal lobes were recorded at the distances of 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm. For the different distances, the M100 peak signal strength, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and latency were analyzed along with the corresponding auditory source localization maps. A single-factor analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in response signals at varying distances.

Results: As the distance between the scalp and the detector increased, the noise, the signal, and the SNR gradually weakened (P<0.001). The noise and signal showed a tendency of linear decline. On the other hand, the SNR reached its maximum at 5 mm and did not show a tendency of linear decline. Latency was not affected by the distance (P=0.72). The results of the auditory stimulus source reconstruction were generally consistent.

Conclusion: When the distance between the detector and the scalp is 5 mm, the SNR value is the highest, resulting in high sensitivity and high signal strength. On the other hand, even when the distance between the detector and the scalp reaches 15 mm, the SNR of the OPM-MEG is still higher than 16 dB, which meets the clinical signal acquisition requirements. Furthermore, the auditory stimulus source reconstruction results were generally consistent. Changing the scalp-to-detector distance does not affect the applicability of the source localization results, validating the device's effectiveness in signal acquisition.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
四川大学学报(医学版)
四川大学学报(医学版) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8695
期刊介绍: "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a comprehensive medical academic journal sponsored by Sichuan University, a higher education institution directly under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in 1959 and was originally named "Journal of Sichuan Medical College". In 1986, it was renamed "Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences". In 2003, it was renamed "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" (bimonthly). "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a Chinese core journal and a Chinese authoritative academic journal (RCCSE). It is included in the retrieval systems such as China Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database (CSTPCD), China Science Citation Database (CSCD) (core version), Peking University Library's "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", the U.S. "Index Medica" (IM/Medline), the U.S. "PubMed Central" (PMC), the U.S. "Biological Abstracts" (BA), the U.S. "Chemical Abstracts" (CA), the U.S. EBSCO, the Netherlands "Abstracts and Citation Database" (Scopus), the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST), the Russian "Abstract Magazine", the Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database (CBMdisc), the Chinese Biomedical Periodical Literature Database (CMCC), the China Academic Journal Network Full-text Database (CNKI), the Chinese Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition), and the Wanfang Data-Digital Journal Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信