Development and validation of a patient knowledge questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis (PKQ-RA-11) in Danish and German.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
L R Knudsen, J Knitza, F Mühlensiepen, A Hueber, J Henes, M Ndosi, A de Thurah
{"title":"Development and validation of a patient knowledge questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis (PKQ-RA-11) in Danish and German.","authors":"L R Knudsen, J Knitza, F Mühlensiepen, A Hueber, J Henes, M Ndosi, A de Thurah","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2025.2463734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient education is a cornerstone of rheumatology care, enabling patients to effectively and safely manage their condition. Standardized patient knowledge assessments are essential for benchmarking care quality and tailoring education to individual needs. This study aimed to develop and validate Danish and German versions of a patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Danish and German adaptations from the English version involved a forward-and-backward translation process. Face validity was assessed with patients with RA in Denmark and Germany. Subsequently, the generated PKQ-RA-11 versions were tested in Danish and German RA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The face-validity assessment included 20 patients (10 Danish, 10 German). Adjustments in the Danish version included rephrasing options and aligning with digital patient education content. The German version followed the refined Danish version with necessary cultural adjustments. PKQ-RA-11 comprises 11 multiple-choice questions with a scoring system to minimize guessing. The final PKQ-RA-11 was completed by 175 Danish and 174 German patients; mean completion time was 7.5 and 7.4 minutes, respectively. Mean ± sd baseline PKQ-RA-11 scores were 7.9 ± 1.6 for Danish and 6.2 ± 2.5 for German participants. Longitudinal data from Denmark indicated an increase in knowledge scores following patient education, shown by a mean score of 8.6 ± 1.5, demonstrating the tool's responsiveness to changes in patient understanding of RA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PKQ-RA-11 is a standardized tool for assessing disease-related knowledge in individuals with RA. It can be used to provide objective and transparent measures of patient understanding in educational programmes, clinical practice, or research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2025.2463734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patient education is a cornerstone of rheumatology care, enabling patients to effectively and safely manage their condition. Standardized patient knowledge assessments are essential for benchmarking care quality and tailoring education to individual needs. This study aimed to develop and validate Danish and German versions of a patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Method: Danish and German adaptations from the English version involved a forward-and-backward translation process. Face validity was assessed with patients with RA in Denmark and Germany. Subsequently, the generated PKQ-RA-11 versions were tested in Danish and German RA patients.

Results: The face-validity assessment included 20 patients (10 Danish, 10 German). Adjustments in the Danish version included rephrasing options and aligning with digital patient education content. The German version followed the refined Danish version with necessary cultural adjustments. PKQ-RA-11 comprises 11 multiple-choice questions with a scoring system to minimize guessing. The final PKQ-RA-11 was completed by 175 Danish and 174 German patients; mean completion time was 7.5 and 7.4 minutes, respectively. Mean ± sd baseline PKQ-RA-11 scores were 7.9 ± 1.6 for Danish and 6.2 ± 2.5 for German participants. Longitudinal data from Denmark indicated an increase in knowledge scores following patient education, shown by a mean score of 8.6 ± 1.5, demonstrating the tool's responsiveness to changes in patient understanding of RA.

Conclusion: PKQ-RA-11 is a standardized tool for assessing disease-related knowledge in individuals with RA. It can be used to provide objective and transparent measures of patient understanding in educational programmes, clinical practice, or research.

丹麦语和德语类风湿性关节炎患者知识问卷(PKQ-RA-11)的开发和验证。
目的:患者教育是风湿病护理的基石,使患者能够有效和安全地管理他们的病情。标准化的患者知识评估对于制定护理质量基准和根据个人需求定制教育至关重要。本研究旨在开发和验证丹麦和德国版本的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者知识问卷(PKQ)。方法:英语版本的丹麦语和德语改编涉及到一个前后翻译的过程。对丹麦和德国的RA患者进行了面部效度评估。随后,在丹麦和德国的RA患者中测试了生成的PKQ-RA-11版本。结果:面部效度评估包括20例患者(丹麦10例,德国10例)。丹麦版本的调整包括重新措辞选项和与数字患者教育内容保持一致。德文版在丹麦版的基础上进行了必要的文化调整。PKQ-RA-11包括11个选择题,并设有计分系统,以尽量减少猜测。175名丹麦患者和174名德国患者完成了最终的PKQ-RA-11;平均完成时间分别为7.5分钟和7.4分钟。丹麦参与者的平均±sd基线PKQ-RA-11评分为7.9±1.6,德国参与者为6.2±2.5。来自丹麦的纵向数据显示,患者教育后知识得分增加,平均得分为8.6±1.5,表明该工具对患者对RA理解变化的响应性。结论:PKQ-RA-11是评估RA患者疾病相关知识的标准化工具。它可用于在教育计划、临床实践或研究中提供客观和透明的患者理解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases. The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including; Epidemiology Aetiology and pathogenesis Treatment and prophylaxis Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信