Sustained-release oral dalfampridine appears to have no impact on upper extremity function in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251321696
Shay Menascu, Lior Frid, Alon Kalron
{"title":"Sustained-release oral dalfampridine appears to have no impact on upper extremity function in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Shay Menascu, Lior Frid, Alon Kalron","doi":"10.1177/17562864251321696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper limb dysfunction is common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), significantly affecting daily activities and quality of life. While dalfampridine has shown efficacy in improving gait in pwMS, its impact on upper extremity function remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sustained-release oral dalfampridine on upper extremity function in pwMS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 30 pwMS were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 2 weeks. Upper extremity function was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks post-treatment using clinical tests (9-Hole Peg Test, Box, and Block Test, peak isometric grip force, 2-point discrimination) and self-reported questionnaires (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, ability measure of the hand, Manual Ability Measurement 36). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate group × time interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant group × time interactions were observed across clinical or self-reported outcomes. Both groups exhibited similar trends over time, with no measurable improvements in upper extremity dexterity, strength, or perceived function attributable to dalfampridine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sustained-release dalfampridine does not appear to improve upper extremity function in pwMS, highlighting its limitations beyond gait-related benefits. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore alternative treatments targeting upper limb dysfunction in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251321696"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251321696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper limb dysfunction is common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), significantly affecting daily activities and quality of life. While dalfampridine has shown efficacy in improving gait in pwMS, its impact on upper extremity function remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of sustained-release oral dalfampridine on upper extremity function in pwMS.

Design: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods: In all, 30 pwMS were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 2 weeks. Upper extremity function was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks post-treatment using clinical tests (9-Hole Peg Test, Box, and Block Test, peak isometric grip force, 2-point discrimination) and self-reported questionnaires (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, ability measure of the hand, Manual Ability Measurement 36). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate group × time interactions.

Results: No significant group × time interactions were observed across clinical or self-reported outcomes. Both groups exhibited similar trends over time, with no measurable improvements in upper extremity dexterity, strength, or perceived function attributable to dalfampridine.

Conclusion: Sustained-release dalfampridine does not appear to improve upper extremity function in pwMS, highlighting its limitations beyond gait-related benefits. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore alternative treatments targeting upper limb dysfunction in this population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361.

缓释口服达福普啶似乎对多发性硬化症患者的上肢功能没有影响:随机对照试验。
背景:上肢功能障碍在多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者中很常见,严重影响日常活动和生活质量。虽然dalfampridine已显示出改善pwMS患者步态的功效,但其对上肢功能的影响尚不清楚。目的:评价口服缓释达福pridine对pwMS患者上肢功能的影响。设计:随机、安慰剂对照试验。方法:总共有30名pwMS患者被随机分为两组,一组服用达福普定(10mg,每日两次),另一组服用安慰剂,疗程为2周。在基线、治疗后1周、治疗后2周和治疗后2周,通过临床测试(9孔钉测试、盒测试和块测试、峰值等距握力、2点辨别)和自我报告问卷(手臂、肩膀和手的残疾、手的能力测量、手动能力测量36)评估上肢功能。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析来评估组间相互作用。结果:在临床或自我报告的结果中没有观察到显著的组×时间相互作用。随着时间的推移,两组都表现出相似的趋势,没有可测量的上肢灵活性、力量或可归因于达福普定的感知功能的改善。结论:缓释达福普定似乎不能改善pwMS患者的上肢功能,这突出了它在步态相关益处之外的局限性。这些发现强调了进一步研究探索针对该人群上肢功能障碍的替代治疗的必要性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信