Effect of Acute Resistance Exercise and Resistance Exercise Training on Central Pulsatile Hemodynamics and Large Artery Stiffness: Part II.

IF 3.8 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000543314
Denis J Wakeham, Gary L Pierce, Kevin S Heffernan
{"title":"Effect of Acute Resistance Exercise and Resistance Exercise Training on Central Pulsatile Hemodynamics and Large Artery Stiffness: Part II.","authors":"Denis J Wakeham, Gary L Pierce, Kevin S Heffernan","doi":"10.1159/000543314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In part one of this two-part series, we performed a detailed analysis of the hemodynamic signature produced during resistance exercise (RE) and discussed the subacute effects on short-term modulation of large artery stiffness and central pulsatile hemodynamics. In this second part of our two-part series, we consider the subacute recovery window as the driver of resistance exercise training (RET) adaptations. We then discuss the results of RET interventions and corroborate these findings against the information gleaned from cross-sectional studies in habitually strength-trained athletes. Finally, we explore associations between muscular strength and arterial stiffness.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Our reanalysis of key studies assessing arterial stiffness in the hour post-RE suggests changes in both load-dependent and load-independent indices of arterial (aortic) stiffness. Regarding adaptations to habitual RET, a growing body of evidence contradicts earlier findings that suggested RET increases large artery stiffness. Recent meta-analyses conclude that longitudinal RET has no effect or may even reduce large artery stiffness. However, cross-sectional studies continue to support early RET intervention studies and note that habitual RET may increase large artery stiffness and central pulsatile hemodynamics. Complex interactions between vascular smooth muscle cells and the extracellular matrix may offer insight into inter-individual heterogeneity in subacute responses and chronic adaptations to acute RE and habitual RET.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Habitual RET is fundamentally important for skeletal muscle quality and quantity as well as cardiovascular function. Recent literature suggests that habitual RET has negligible effects on large artery stiffness and central hemodynamic pressure pulsatility, but cross-sectional observations still raise questions about the chronic large artery effects of habitual RET.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"13 1","pages":"45-61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In part one of this two-part series, we performed a detailed analysis of the hemodynamic signature produced during resistance exercise (RE) and discussed the subacute effects on short-term modulation of large artery stiffness and central pulsatile hemodynamics. In this second part of our two-part series, we consider the subacute recovery window as the driver of resistance exercise training (RET) adaptations. We then discuss the results of RET interventions and corroborate these findings against the information gleaned from cross-sectional studies in habitually strength-trained athletes. Finally, we explore associations between muscular strength and arterial stiffness.

Summary: Our reanalysis of key studies assessing arterial stiffness in the hour post-RE suggests changes in both load-dependent and load-independent indices of arterial (aortic) stiffness. Regarding adaptations to habitual RET, a growing body of evidence contradicts earlier findings that suggested RET increases large artery stiffness. Recent meta-analyses conclude that longitudinal RET has no effect or may even reduce large artery stiffness. However, cross-sectional studies continue to support early RET intervention studies and note that habitual RET may increase large artery stiffness and central pulsatile hemodynamics. Complex interactions between vascular smooth muscle cells and the extracellular matrix may offer insight into inter-individual heterogeneity in subacute responses and chronic adaptations to acute RE and habitual RET.

Key messages: Habitual RET is fundamentally important for skeletal muscle quality and quantity as well as cardiovascular function. Recent literature suggests that habitual RET has negligible effects on large artery stiffness and central hemodynamic pressure pulsatility, but cross-sectional observations still raise questions about the chronic large artery effects of habitual RET.

急性阻力运动和阻力运动训练对中央搏动血流动力学和大动脉硬度的影响:第二部分。
背景:在这个由两部分组成的系列文章的第一部分中,我们对阻力运动(RE)期间产生的血流动力学特征进行了详细分析,并讨论了亚急性对大动脉刚度和中央脉动血流动力学的短期调节的影响。在我们的两部分系列的第二部分,我们考虑亚急性恢复窗口作为阻力运动训练(RET)适应的驱动因素。然后,我们讨论了RET干预的结果,并根据从习惯性力量训练运动员的横断面研究中收集的信息证实了这些发现。最后,我们探讨了肌肉力量和动脉僵硬之间的联系。总结:我们对re后一小时内评估动脉僵硬度的关键研究进行了再分析,发现动脉(主动脉)僵硬度的负荷相关和负荷无关指标都发生了变化。关于对习惯性RET的适应,越来越多的证据与早期的发现相矛盾,该发现认为RET会增加大动脉的硬度。最近的荟萃分析得出结论,纵向RET没有效果,甚至没有降低大动脉僵硬度。然而,横断面研究继续支持早期RET干预研究,并注意到习惯性RET可能会增加大动脉僵硬度和中央搏动血流动力学。血管平滑肌细胞和细胞外基质之间的复杂相互作用可能有助于了解急性RE和习惯性RET的亚急性反应和慢性适应的个体间异质性。关键信息:习惯性RET对骨骼肌的质量和数量以及心血管功能至关重要。最近的文献表明,习惯性RET对大动脉硬度和中央血流动压脉动的影响可以忽略不计,但横断面观察仍然对习惯性RET的慢性大动脉效应提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信