Association between guideline-directed medical therapy and reintervention risk following peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral artery disease.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Isabella Capuano, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
{"title":"Association between guideline-directed medical therapy and reintervention risk following peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral artery disease.","authors":"Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Isabella Capuano, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251320347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reintervention following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended post-PVI, yet its association with reintervention outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative registry data linked with Medicare outcome for patients undergoing PVI for PAD (2017-2018). GDMT was defined as the receipt of statin, antiplatelet, and angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE/ARB) therapy if hypertensive at discharge. Competing risk analyses and conditional risk models assessed the reintervention outcome, and the recurrent reintervention outcomes within 2 years, by GDMT receipt, compliance with each GDMT element, the number of elements received, and GDMT rate across sites and operators in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13,244 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 9.9, women 41.0%). The reintervention outcome did not differ by GDMT receipt (cumulative incidence: 43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] in no GDMT vs 41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%] in GDMT; subhazard ratio (sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]), compliance with GDMT elements, the number of elements received, or site and operator GDMT rates (sHR per 10% increase: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02]) (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). However, a higher operator GDMT rate reduced the recurrent reintervention risk (HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], <i>p</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Around 40% of patients undergoing a PVI experience reintervention within 2 years, but the outcome was not reduced with GDMT receipt, and higher GDMT rates by site and operators were not associated with reintervention risk. Future studies should focus on medication adherence, refills, and more granular GDMT data for PAD care surveillance postrevascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251320347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251320347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reintervention following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended post-PVI, yet its association with reintervention outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative registry data linked with Medicare outcome for patients undergoing PVI for PAD (2017-2018). GDMT was defined as the receipt of statin, antiplatelet, and angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE/ARB) therapy if hypertensive at discharge. Competing risk analyses and conditional risk models assessed the reintervention outcome, and the recurrent reintervention outcomes within 2 years, by GDMT receipt, compliance with each GDMT element, the number of elements received, and GDMT rate across sites and operators in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.

Results: We included 13,244 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 9.9, women 41.0%). The reintervention outcome did not differ by GDMT receipt (cumulative incidence: 43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] in no GDMT vs 41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%] in GDMT; subhazard ratio (sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]), compliance with GDMT elements, the number of elements received, or site and operator GDMT rates (sHR per 10% increase: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02]) (all p > 0.05). However, a higher operator GDMT rate reduced the recurrent reintervention risk (HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], p = 0.026).

Conclusion: Around 40% of patients undergoing a PVI experience reintervention within 2 years, but the outcome was not reduced with GDMT receipt, and higher GDMT rates by site and operators were not associated with reintervention risk. Future studies should focus on medication adherence, refills, and more granular GDMT data for PAD care surveillance postrevascularization.

外周动脉疾病患者外周血管干预后,指南指导的药物治疗与再干预风险之间的关系
外周动脉疾病(PAD)外周血管介入治疗(PVI)后再介入治疗是很常见的。指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT)被推荐在pvi后,但其与再干预结果的关系尚不清楚。方法:我们分析了血管质量倡议注册数据与2017-2018年PAD患者接受PVI的医疗保险结果相关。GDMT定义为出院时高血压患者接受他汀类药物、抗血小板药物和血管紧张素转换酶或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACE/ARB)治疗。在1:1的倾向评分匹配队列中,竞争风险分析和条件风险模型通过GDMT接收、每个GDMT要素的依从性、接收要素的数量以及不同地点和操作人员的GDMT率来评估再干预结果和2年内的反复再干预结果。结果:纳入13244例患者(平均年龄72.0±9.9岁,女性41.0%)。再干预结果没有因GDMT的接受而不同(累计发生率:未GDMT组43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] vs GDMT组41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%];亚危险比(sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]),对GDMT要素的依从性,接受的要素数量,或现场和操作员GDMT率(每增加10%的sHR: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03]和1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02])(均p < 0.05)。然而,较高的操作人员GDMT率降低了复发再干预风险(HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], p = 0.026)。结论:大约40%的PVI患者在2年内经历了再干预,但结果并没有随着GDMT的接受而降低,并且部位和操作人员的GDMT率较高与再干预风险无关。未来的研究应侧重于药物依从性、再填充和更细粒度的GDMT数据,用于血管化后PAD护理监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信