A Comparative Investigation on Clinical Characteristics in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Two Distinct Guidelines.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S484935
Tingting Ji, Ting Long, Xiaodan Li, Zhifei Xu, Jing Zhao, Guixiang Wang, Hua Wang, Hongbin Li, Fengzhen Zhang, Li Zheng, Shengcai Wang, Xin Ni
{"title":"A Comparative Investigation on Clinical Characteristics in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Two Distinct Guidelines.","authors":"Tingting Ji, Ting Long, Xiaodan Li, Zhifei Xu, Jing Zhao, Guixiang Wang, Hua Wang, Hongbin Li, Fengzhen Zhang, Li Zheng, Shengcai Wang, Xin Ni","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S484935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"17 ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S484935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA.

Methods: Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics.

Results: Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups.

Conclusion: The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

基于两种不同指南的儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停临床特征的比较研究。
目的:探讨2007年和2020年指南诊断的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患儿与非OSA患儿临床特征评估的差异,以及学龄前和学龄OSA患儿多导睡眠图(PSG)参数与认知测试得分的关系。方法:共招募80名儿童,根据两个不同的指南分为OSA组和非OSA组,并进一步细分为学龄前和学龄亚组。分析和比较各组和亚组间PSG参数和认知测试得分的差异,然后进行偏相关分析以确定这些特征之间的相关性。结果:与2007版指南相比,2020版指南在临床特征评估方面表现出更显著的组间差异,尤其是言语智商(VIQ)。对于OSA亚组和非OSA亚组的学龄前儿童,两种指南在PSG参数和Block Diagram上存在显著差异。此外,2007版指南在图片词汇方面存在差异,2020版指南在表现智商(PIQ)和几何图形方面存在差异。对于OSA和非OSA亚组的学龄儿童,两版指南在PSG参数、全面智商(FIQ)和方框图方面均存在显著差异。2007年指南在PIQ方面存在显著差异,而2020年指南在VIQ方面存在显著差异。此外,在不同的亚组中,PSG参数与认知测试得分之间存在显著的相关性。结论:2020版指南在评估OSA患儿临床特征,尤其是语言功能方面具有优势,值得临床推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信