Characteristics and Medical Accuracy of Online Discussions of Retinal Conditions on a Social Media Platform.

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Araliya N Gunawardene, Sanjana Suraneni, Landon J Rohowetz, Jayanth Sridhar
{"title":"Characteristics and Medical Accuracy of Online Discussions of Retinal Conditions on a Social Media Platform.","authors":"Araliya N Gunawardene, Sanjana Suraneni, Landon J Rohowetz, Jayanth Sridhar","doi":"10.1177/24741264251315139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess the content and medical accuracy of retina-related patient discussions on Reddit, an anonymous social media platform, to better understand the main concerns and reliability of a highly accessible resource. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the top 20 posts and top 3 comments from 2011 to 2022 on the Reddit subforums r/Optometry and r/EyeTriage containing the following keywords: \"retinal detachment\", \"macular edema\", \"macular degeneration\", and \"diabetic retinopathy\". <b>Results:</b> This study assessed 407 posts and comments. Most users who posted were current patients (n = 71 [60.2%]). Most commenters did not specify their identity (n = 172 [59.5%]). A portion of respondents identified as optometrists (n = 51 [17.6%]), and few identified as ophthalmologists (n = 11 [3.8%]). Many statements were medically inaccurate (n = 31 [40.8%]), with pathophysiology comprising the most commonly misunderstood topic (n = 15 [48.4%]). <b>Conclusions:</b> Given the prevalence of inaccurate information and the lack of credibility among Reddit posters, patients should take caution in using these sites for medical guidance regarding retinal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251315139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251315139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the content and medical accuracy of retina-related patient discussions on Reddit, an anonymous social media platform, to better understand the main concerns and reliability of a highly accessible resource. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the top 20 posts and top 3 comments from 2011 to 2022 on the Reddit subforums r/Optometry and r/EyeTriage containing the following keywords: "retinal detachment", "macular edema", "macular degeneration", and "diabetic retinopathy". Results: This study assessed 407 posts and comments. Most users who posted were current patients (n = 71 [60.2%]). Most commenters did not specify their identity (n = 172 [59.5%]). A portion of respondents identified as optometrists (n = 51 [17.6%]), and few identified as ophthalmologists (n = 11 [3.8%]). Many statements were medically inaccurate (n = 31 [40.8%]), with pathophysiology comprising the most commonly misunderstood topic (n = 15 [48.4%]). Conclusions: Given the prevalence of inaccurate information and the lack of credibility among Reddit posters, patients should take caution in using these sites for medical guidance regarding retinal conditions.

社交媒体平台上视网膜疾病在线讨论的特点及医学准确性
目的:评估匿名社交媒体平台Reddit上视网膜相关患者讨论的内容和医学准确性,以更好地了解高度可访问资源的主要关注点和可靠性。方法:对2011 - 2022年Reddit r/Optometry和r/EyeTriage分论坛中包含“视网膜脱离”、“黄斑水肿”、“黄斑变性”和“糖尿病视网膜病变”等关键词的前20条帖子和前3条评论进行横断面分析。结果:本研究评估了407篇帖子和评论。发帖的大多数用户为当前患者(n = 71[60.2%])。大多数评论者没有说明自己的身份(n = 172[59.5%])。一部分被调查者认为是验光师(n = 51[17.6%]),少数被认为是眼科医生(n = 11[3.8%])。许多陈述在医学上是不准确的(n = 31[40.8%]),病理生理学是最常被误解的主题(n = 15[48.4%])。结论:考虑到Reddit帖子中普遍存在不准确的信息和缺乏可信度,患者在使用这些网站进行视网膜疾病的医疗指导时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信