Knowledge, attitude and acceptability for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Paridhi Gupta, Reeta Mahey, Neha Varun, Maninder Kaur, Arun Kumar, Satyam Yadav
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude and acceptability for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Paridhi Gupta, Reeta Mahey, Neha Varun, Maninder Kaur, Arun Kumar, Satyam Yadav","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_780_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To study the knowledge, attitude, and acceptability of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A cross-sectional study conducted in the family planning clinic of a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>Women aged 18-45 years attending contraception counselling sessions were included. Baseline knowledge about LARC methods was assessed. They were given information about LARC methods. Acceptability was assessed on a scale of 0-10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among four LARC methods, awareness about copper intrauterine devices (CuIUD), DMPA injection, subdermal implant and Mirena was 95%, 55.50%, 27% and 3%, respectively. Around 4% were unaware of the LARC method. Of total, 76.50% women procured the LARC methods information from health care workers, whereas 40% attained from friends, family members, neighbors, or colleagues. After counseling, the majority (58%) were willing for subdermal implant. About 27.50% and 13.50% were willing for copper IUD insertion and injection DMPA, respectively. None was willing for Mirena. Acceptability of various LARC methods was scaled on an acceptability score from 0 to 10. For Cu IUD, implanon and DMPA, the acceptability score was 10 in 50%, 40.17% and 25%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are still gaps of knowledge about benefits and safety of available LARC methods. To improve wide coverage and more acceptability of LARC methods, involvement of health care workers and addition of subdermal implants to contraceptive counseling should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"160-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_780_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To study the knowledge, attitude, and acceptability of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions.

Settings and design: A cross-sectional study conducted in the family planning clinic of a tertiary care hospital.

Methods and material: Women aged 18-45 years attending contraception counselling sessions were included. Baseline knowledge about LARC methods was assessed. They were given information about LARC methods. Acceptability was assessed on a scale of 0-10.

Results: Among four LARC methods, awareness about copper intrauterine devices (CuIUD), DMPA injection, subdermal implant and Mirena was 95%, 55.50%, 27% and 3%, respectively. Around 4% were unaware of the LARC method. Of total, 76.50% women procured the LARC methods information from health care workers, whereas 40% attained from friends, family members, neighbors, or colleagues. After counseling, the majority (58%) were willing for subdermal implant. About 27.50% and 13.50% were willing for copper IUD insertion and injection DMPA, respectively. None was willing for Mirena. Acceptability of various LARC methods was scaled on an acceptability score from 0 to 10. For Cu IUD, implanon and DMPA, the acceptability score was 10 in 50%, 40.17% and 25%, respectively.

Conclusions: There are still gaps of knowledge about benefits and safety of available LARC methods. To improve wide coverage and more acceptability of LARC methods, involvement of health care workers and addition of subdermal implants to contraceptive counseling should be considered.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信