Investigating Gram-negative bacilli isolates' sensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Sunali, Mithilesh Kumar Jha, Mukesh Kumar, Maneesh Kumar, Nishant Ranjan
{"title":"Investigating Gram-negative bacilli isolates' sensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam.","authors":"Sunali, Mithilesh Kumar Jha, Mukesh Kumar, Maneesh Kumar, Nishant Ranjan","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1272_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram negative organisms are becoming increasingly common. Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a major threat and necessitate the development of new antibiotics. MDR and carbapenem resistant infections, which are common in intensive care units and hospitals, lead to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. New antimicrobials such as ceftazidime avibactam offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments such as tigecycline and colistin, which have significant side effects and limitations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study focuses on the antibiotic susceptibility of ceftazidime/ avibactam to Gram negative bacilli found in a large number of clinical samples collected from a tertiary care facility in Netaji Subhas Medical University and Hospital, Bihta, India.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 81 Gram negative bacteria isolated from patient samples. Based on the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines mentioned in the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Result and conclusion: </strong>the results showed that ceftazidime avibactam inhibited 89.9% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which was higher than the 80.3% of amikacin and the 85.1% of meropenem. Ceftazidime avibactam was effective against CRE isolates in 69.9% of cases and against MDR isolates in urine in 94% of cases, which was higher than the 40% of ceftriaxone and 94% of nitrofurantoin. The results show that ceftazidime avibactam can cure MDR and CRE infections, especially urinary tract infections, better than conventional antibiotics, which is a great help in the fight against increasing antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"311-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1272_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram negative organisms are becoming increasingly common. Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a major threat and necessitate the development of new antibiotics. MDR and carbapenem resistant infections, which are common in intensive care units and hospitals, lead to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. New antimicrobials such as ceftazidime avibactam offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments such as tigecycline and colistin, which have significant side effects and limitations.

Aim: This study focuses on the antibiotic susceptibility of ceftazidime/ avibactam to Gram negative bacilli found in a large number of clinical samples collected from a tertiary care facility in Netaji Subhas Medical University and Hospital, Bihta, India.

Methodology: The study included 81 Gram negative bacteria isolated from patient samples. Based on the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines mentioned in the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method.

Result and conclusion: the results showed that ceftazidime avibactam inhibited 89.9% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which was higher than the 80.3% of amikacin and the 85.1% of meropenem. Ceftazidime avibactam was effective against CRE isolates in 69.9% of cases and against MDR isolates in urine in 94% of cases, which was higher than the 40% of ceftriaxone and 94% of nitrofurantoin. The results show that ceftazidime avibactam can cure MDR and CRE infections, especially urinary tract infections, better than conventional antibiotics, which is a great help in the fight against increasing antibiotic resistance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信