Quality Improvement in General Dental Practice: Situational Analysis for the United Kingdom and Germany.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
C Lin, V Fehrer, L O'Malley, W Thompson, S Listl, M Lorenz, M Byrne
{"title":"Quality Improvement in General Dental Practice: Situational Analysis for the United Kingdom and Germany.","authors":"C Lin, V Fehrer, L O'Malley, W Thompson, S Listl, M Lorenz, M Byrne","doi":"10.1177/23800844241306734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) is important in ensuring standards in oral health care. Despite the growing literature on quality indicators, audit, and feedback, the perceptions and expectations of oral health professionals toward QI remain unclear. Understanding these perspectives, barriers, and facilitators is important to effectively encourage and maintain QI activities in dental practices. This is the first of 6 publications in a series titled \"Situational Analysis of QI in Oral Health Care in Europe.\"</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how QI was conducted and perceived in dental practices in the United Kingdom and Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A situational analysis, comprising desk research and semistructured interviews, was conducted. Data collection was conducted from May to October 2023. Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit dental practice participants in the United Kingdom and Germany. Interviews and key texts were thematically analyzed to synthesize 3 maps: a situational map, a social world map, and a positional map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were interviewed, comprising dentists, dental hygienists, dental therapists, dental nurses, and practice managers. The participants described 6 competing positions surrounding QI: QI activities were expressed as being worthwhile or box-ticking exercises to satisfy regulators. Some felt that QI detracted from service delivery and should not be the role of the dentist, whereas others stressed the need for a whole-team approach. Some felt that patients were important to judge quality, whereas others felt quality in dentistry required understanding of technical processes beyond the reach of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided insights into how QI activities were carried out in dental practices in the United Kingdom and Germany and how it is was perceived by those working in this environment. This study offers key observations into the situations, social worlds and arenas, and positions that influence QI in dental practices.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>The findings from this study highlight several contextual barriers and facilitators to quality improvement in general dental practice. Understanding these determinants of quality improvement is relevant for oral health teams and dental practice managers who aim to develop and implement quality improvement strategies in dental practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"23800844241306734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844241306734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) is important in ensuring standards in oral health care. Despite the growing literature on quality indicators, audit, and feedback, the perceptions and expectations of oral health professionals toward QI remain unclear. Understanding these perspectives, barriers, and facilitators is important to effectively encourage and maintain QI activities in dental practices. This is the first of 6 publications in a series titled "Situational Analysis of QI in Oral Health Care in Europe."

Aim: This study aimed to investigate how QI was conducted and perceived in dental practices in the United Kingdom and Germany.

Methods: A situational analysis, comprising desk research and semistructured interviews, was conducted. Data collection was conducted from May to October 2023. Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit dental practice participants in the United Kingdom and Germany. Interviews and key texts were thematically analyzed to synthesize 3 maps: a situational map, a social world map, and a positional map.

Results: Eighteen participants were interviewed, comprising dentists, dental hygienists, dental therapists, dental nurses, and practice managers. The participants described 6 competing positions surrounding QI: QI activities were expressed as being worthwhile or box-ticking exercises to satisfy regulators. Some felt that QI detracted from service delivery and should not be the role of the dentist, whereas others stressed the need for a whole-team approach. Some felt that patients were important to judge quality, whereas others felt quality in dentistry required understanding of technical processes beyond the reach of patients.

Conclusion: This study provided insights into how QI activities were carried out in dental practices in the United Kingdom and Germany and how it is was perceived by those working in this environment. This study offers key observations into the situations, social worlds and arenas, and positions that influence QI in dental practices.

Knowledge transfer statement: The findings from this study highlight several contextual barriers and facilitators to quality improvement in general dental practice. Understanding these determinants of quality improvement is relevant for oral health teams and dental practice managers who aim to develop and implement quality improvement strategies in dental practice.

普通牙科实践的质量改进:英国和德国的情景分析。
质量改进(QI)是确保口腔卫生保健标准的重要手段。尽管关于质量指标、审计和反馈的文献越来越多,但口腔健康专业人员对QI的看法和期望仍然不清楚。了解这些观点、障碍和促进因素对于有效地鼓励和维持牙科实践中的QI活动非常重要。这是“欧洲口腔卫生保健中气的情境分析”系列丛书的六篇中的第一篇。目的:本研究旨在调查在英国和德国的牙科实践中如何进行和感知气。方法:进行情境分析,包括案头调查和半结构化访谈。数据收集时间为2023年5月至10月。目的和雪球抽样技术被用来招募牙科实践参与者在英国和德国。访谈和关键文本按主题进行分析,合成了三幅地图:情景地图、社会世界地图和位置地图。结果:采访了18名参与者,包括牙医、牙科保健师、牙科治疗师、牙科护士和实践经理。参与者描述了围绕QI的6种相互竞争的立场:QI活动被表示为值得或打勾的练习,以满足监管机构。有些人认为医疗辅助服务有碍服务的提供,不应由牙医来担当,而另一些人则强调需要采用全队合作的方法。一些人认为病人是判断质量的重要因素,而另一些人则认为牙科的质量需要了解病人无法达到的技术过程。结论:这项研究提供了关于在英国和德国的牙科实践中QI活动是如何进行的以及在这种环境中工作的人是如何感知的见解。本研究提供了对牙科实践中影响气的情况、社会世界和领域以及立场的关键观察。知识转移声明:这项研究的结果强调了在普通牙科实践中提高质量的几个背景障碍和促进因素。了解这些质量改进的决定因素是相关的口腔健康团队和牙科实践管理人员谁的目标是制定和实施质量改进战略,在牙科实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信