The Value of NLR and PLR in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Combined with Interstitial Lung Disease and Assessment of Treatment Effect: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S509546
Peng Cui, Tao Cheng, Huichun Yan, Dong Xu, Guohua Ren, Shangmin Ma
{"title":"The Value of NLR and PLR in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Combined with Interstitial Lung Disease and Assessment of Treatment Effect: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Peng Cui, Tao Cheng, Huichun Yan, Dong Xu, Guohua Ren, Shangmin Ma","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S509546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective cohort study investigated the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 163 patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled, with 122 patients in the RA group and 41 patients in the RA-ILD group. The mean age of the RA group was 63.84 ± 8.53 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 14:47. The RA-ILD group had a mean age of 66.29 ± 12.72 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 13:28. During the 2-year follow-up period, 10 patients in the RA group developed interstitial lung disease (ILD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NLR and PLR were significantly higher in RA-ILD group than in RA group (p < 0.05). The optimal critical values of NLR and PLR for the diagnosis of RA-ILD were 3.15 and 152.62, the area under ROC curve was 0.615 and 0.61, the sensitivity was 72%, 62%, and the specificity was 54% and 64%. NLR and PLR were significantly increased after ILD during follow-up in RA patients but decreased after ILD in the predicted percentage of vital capacity (VC%), forced vital capacity (FVC%), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) and carbon monoxide dispersion (DLcoSB%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, NLR and PLR decreased after treatment. While VC%, FVC%, FEV1%, and DLcoSB% increased after treatment (p < 0.05). NLR was negatively correlated with FVC% and DLcoSB% both before and after treatment. PLR was also significantly negatively correlated with FVC% and DLcoSB% before and after treatment (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When NLR and PLR increase, we should be alert to the possibility of RA complicated with ILD, which can be used as an evaluation index of the treatment effect of RA-ILD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"867-880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S509546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective cohort study investigated the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

Methods: A total of 163 patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled, with 122 patients in the RA group and 41 patients in the RA-ILD group. The mean age of the RA group was 63.84 ± 8.53 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 14:47. The RA-ILD group had a mean age of 66.29 ± 12.72 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 13:28. During the 2-year follow-up period, 10 patients in the RA group developed interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Results: NLR and PLR were significantly higher in RA-ILD group than in RA group (p < 0.05). The optimal critical values of NLR and PLR for the diagnosis of RA-ILD were 3.15 and 152.62, the area under ROC curve was 0.615 and 0.61, the sensitivity was 72%, 62%, and the specificity was 54% and 64%. NLR and PLR were significantly increased after ILD during follow-up in RA patients but decreased after ILD in the predicted percentage of vital capacity (VC%), forced vital capacity (FVC%), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) and carbon monoxide dispersion (DLcoSB%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, NLR and PLR decreased after treatment. While VC%, FVC%, FEV1%, and DLcoSB% increased after treatment (p < 0.05). NLR was negatively correlated with FVC% and DLcoSB% both before and after treatment. PLR was also significantly negatively correlated with FVC% and DLcoSB% before and after treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: When NLR and PLR increase, we should be alert to the possibility of RA complicated with ILD, which can be used as an evaluation index of the treatment effect of RA-ILD.

NLR和PLR在类风湿关节炎合并间质性肺疾病诊断及疗效评价中的价值:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:本回顾性队列研究探讨中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在类风湿关节炎合并间质性肺疾病(RA-ILD)诊断和治疗中的价值。方法:共纳入163例新诊断的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者,其中RA组122例,RA- ild组41例。RA组平均年龄为63.84±8.53岁,男女比例为14:47。RA-ILD组平均年龄66.29±12.72岁,男女比例为13:28。在2年随访期间,RA组有10例患者发生间质性肺疾病(ILD)。结果:RA- ild组NLR、PLR显著高于RA组(p < 0.05)。NLR和PLR诊断RA-ILD的最佳临界值分别为3.15和152.62,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.615和0.61,敏感性分别为72%、62%,特异性分别为54%和64%。RA患者随访期间,肺活量预测百分比(VC%)、用力肺活量(FVC%)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1%)和一氧化碳弥散度(DLcoSB%)在ILD后NLR和PLR均显著升高,而在ILD后降低(p < 0.05)。治疗后NLR和PLR降低。治疗后VC%、FVC%、FEV1%、DLcoSB%升高(p < 0.05)。治疗前后NLR与FVC%、DLcoSB%呈负相关。治疗前后PLR与FVC%、DLcoSB%呈显著负相关(p < 0.05)。结论:当NLR和PLR升高时,应警惕RA合并ILD的可能性,可作为RA-ILD治疗效果的评价指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信