Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination Program in an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.8644
Lingling Chen, Natalie White, Emma Patten, Danielle Barth, Leanne N Constable, Teresa Hall, Ashraful Kabir, Harriet Hiscock, Sarah Loveday
{"title":"Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination Program in an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Lingling Chen, Natalie White, Emma Patten, Danielle Barth, Leanne N Constable, Teresa Hall, Ashraful Kabir, Harriet Hiscock, Sarah Loveday","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Families experiencing adversity often have complex needs and face barriers to accessing health and social care. This study evaluated the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination (WBC) program to improve access to services. The program combined care navigation and social prescribing within an integrated health and social care Child and Family Hub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design, with data collected through surveys and interviews from: 1) caregivers who participated in the WBC program (<i>n</i> = 11) and those who did not (<i>n</i> = 18), and 2) practitioners working in the Hub (<i>n</i> = 21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers and practitioners found the WBC program acceptable and mostly feasible, demonstrating the potential to alleviate caregivers' loneliness and enhance their health, connection to the community, and knowledge and confidence in supporting child and family health and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Future WBC program enhancements could include a robust communication strategy to ensure what the program offers is clearly understood by practitioners and caregivers, establishing organisational structures to provide adequate support for the wellbeing coordinator and adopting flexible eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WBC program appears acceptable and feasible. Future research should establish program effectiveness with larger and more diverse caregiver samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Families experiencing adversity often have complex needs and face barriers to accessing health and social care. This study evaluated the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination (WBC) program to improve access to services. The program combined care navigation and social prescribing within an integrated health and social care Child and Family Hub.

Methods: Mixed-methods design, with data collected through surveys and interviews from: 1) caregivers who participated in the WBC program (n = 11) and those who did not (n = 18), and 2) practitioners working in the Hub (n = 21).

Results: Caregivers and practitioners found the WBC program acceptable and mostly feasible, demonstrating the potential to alleviate caregivers' loneliness and enhance their health, connection to the community, and knowledge and confidence in supporting child and family health and wellbeing.

Discussion: Future WBC program enhancements could include a robust communication strategy to ensure what the program offers is clearly understood by practitioners and caregivers, establishing organisational structures to provide adequate support for the wellbeing coordinator and adopting flexible eligibility criteria.

Conclusion: The WBC program appears acceptable and feasible. Future research should establish program effectiveness with larger and more diverse caregiver samples.

综合健康和社会护理中心福利协调计划的可接受性、可行性和初步有效性:一项混合方法研究。
导言:经历逆境的家庭往往有复杂的需求,在获得保健和社会护理方面面临障碍。本研究评估了福利协调(WBC)计划的可接受性、可行性和初步有效性,以改善服务的可及性。该方案将护理导航和社会处方结合在一个综合健康和社会护理儿童和家庭中心内。方法:采用混合方法设计,通过调查和访谈收集数据:1)参加WBC项目的护理人员(n = 11)和未参加WBC项目的护理人员(n = 18),以及2)在中心工作的从业人员(n = 21)。结果:护理人员和从业人员发现WBC项目是可以接受的,而且大部分是可行的,显示了减轻护理人员孤独感、增强他们的健康、与社区的联系、以及在支持儿童和家庭健康和福祉方面的知识和信心的潜力。讨论:未来WBC项目的改进可以包括一个强有力的沟通策略,以确保从业者和护理人员清楚地理解项目提供的内容,建立组织结构,为福利协调员提供足够的支持,并采用灵活的资格标准。结论:白细胞计数方案是可以接受和可行的。未来的研究应该在更大、更多样化的护理人员样本中建立项目的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信