Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use and Outcomes for Children Undergoing Cholecystectomy.

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kerri A McKie, Anoosha Moturu, Dionne A Graham, Melvin Coleman, Reiping Huang, Catherine Grant, Jacqueline M Saito, Bruce L Hall, Robert A Cina, Jason G Newland, Clifford Ko, Shawn J Rangel
{"title":"Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use and Outcomes for Children Undergoing Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Kerri A McKie, Anoosha Moturu, Dionne A Graham, Melvin Coleman, Reiping Huang, Catherine Grant, Jacqueline M Saito, Bruce L Hall, Robert A Cina, Jason G Newland, Clifford Ko, Shawn J Rangel","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Consensus guidelines from the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend against antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operative management of uncomplicated cholelithiasis; however, these guidelines were derived entirely from the adult surgical population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare surgical site infection (SSI) outcomes between children undergoing cholecystectomy who received prophylaxis and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a cohort study using data from 141 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric. Patients younger than 18 years who underwent cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis from January 2021 to December 2022 were identified. Exclusion criteria included diagnoses of acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis, choledocholithiasis, hematologic disorders, and emergent procedures.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Administration of prophylactic antibiotics before incision.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were 30-day postoperative SSI and readmission. Propensity score weighting on the likelihood of receiving prophylaxis was used to balance groups on case acuity, duration of surgery, hospital discharge diagnosis, and patient characteristics. The association between outcomes and the use of prophylaxis was estimated using logistic regression models, weighted by the inverse probability of treatment with a random effect by hospital to control for hospital-level clustering. A secondary analysis was performed exploring the association between broad-spectrum prophylaxis and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2234 children who met criteria for inclusion (median age, 15.3 years; 19.7% male [399 of 2025]), 2025 (90.6%) received prophylaxis (utilization rates ranged from 0% to 100% among hospitals). Cefazolin was the most commonly used antibiotic (69.2% [1401 of 2025]), and 559 of 2025 patients (27.6%) received extended-spectrum prophylaxis (compared with cefazolin). In the propensity-weighted cohort, SSI rates were lower for children who received prophylaxis compared with those who did not (18.0 of 2016 [0.9%] vs 7.8 of 212 [3.7%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70), and rates were similar between children receiving cefazolin and those receiving more extended-spectrum antibiotics in a secondary propensity-weighted analysis (13.9 of 1399 [1.0%] vs 2.9 of 558 [0.5%]; AOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.15-1.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this study support prophylaxis use for children undergoing nonemergent cholecystectomy; however, use of extended-spectrum antibiotics was not associated with superior outcomes compared with cefazolin alone. Opportunities to optimize infection prevention or antimicrobial stewardship were identified in more than one-third of all children undergoing cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"447-454"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Consensus guidelines from the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend against antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operative management of uncomplicated cholelithiasis; however, these guidelines were derived entirely from the adult surgical population.

Objective: To compare surgical site infection (SSI) outcomes between children undergoing cholecystectomy who received prophylaxis and those who did not.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a cohort study using data from 141 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric. Patients younger than 18 years who underwent cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis from January 2021 to December 2022 were identified. Exclusion criteria included diagnoses of acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis, choledocholithiasis, hematologic disorders, and emergent procedures.

Exposure: Administration of prophylactic antibiotics before incision.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were 30-day postoperative SSI and readmission. Propensity score weighting on the likelihood of receiving prophylaxis was used to balance groups on case acuity, duration of surgery, hospital discharge diagnosis, and patient characteristics. The association between outcomes and the use of prophylaxis was estimated using logistic regression models, weighted by the inverse probability of treatment with a random effect by hospital to control for hospital-level clustering. A secondary analysis was performed exploring the association between broad-spectrum prophylaxis and outcomes.

Results: Of 2234 children who met criteria for inclusion (median age, 15.3 years; 19.7% male [399 of 2025]), 2025 (90.6%) received prophylaxis (utilization rates ranged from 0% to 100% among hospitals). Cefazolin was the most commonly used antibiotic (69.2% [1401 of 2025]), and 559 of 2025 patients (27.6%) received extended-spectrum prophylaxis (compared with cefazolin). In the propensity-weighted cohort, SSI rates were lower for children who received prophylaxis compared with those who did not (18.0 of 2016 [0.9%] vs 7.8 of 212 [3.7%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70), and rates were similar between children receiving cefazolin and those receiving more extended-spectrum antibiotics in a secondary propensity-weighted analysis (13.9 of 1399 [1.0%] vs 2.9 of 558 [0.5%]; AOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.15-1.95).

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this study support prophylaxis use for children undergoing nonemergent cholecystectomy; however, use of extended-spectrum antibiotics was not associated with superior outcomes compared with cefazolin alone. Opportunities to optimize infection prevention or antimicrobial stewardship were identified in more than one-third of all children undergoing cholecystectomy.

胆囊切除术儿童抗菌药物预防使用及预后。
重要性:美国传染病学会的共识指南建议在无并发症胆石症的手术治疗中不要使用抗菌药物预防;然而,这些指南完全来自于成年手术人群。目的:比较接受预防和未接受预防的胆囊切除术儿童手术部位感染(SSI)结局。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项队列研究,使用了参与国家儿科外科质量改进计划的141家医院的数据。在2021年1月至2022年12月期间,年龄小于18岁的无并发症胆石症患者接受了胆囊切除术。排除标准包括诊断为急性胆囊炎、胰腺炎、胆总管结石、血液系统疾病和紧急手术。暴露:切口前给予预防性抗生素。主要结局和措施:主要结局为术后30天SSI和再入院。对接受预防的可能性进行倾向评分加权,以平衡病例敏锐度、手术持续时间、出院诊断和患者特征组。使用逻辑回归模型估计结果与预防使用之间的关联,并通过医院随机效应治疗的逆概率加权,以控制医院水平的聚类。进行了二次分析,探讨广谱预防与结果之间的关系。结果:2234名符合纳入标准的儿童(中位年龄15.3岁;19.7%的男性(2025年中的399例),2025年(90.6%)接受了预防治疗(医院的使用率从0%到100%不等)。头孢唑林是最常用的抗生素(69.2%[1401 / 2025]),2025例患者中有559例(27.6%)接受了广谱预防(与头孢唑林相比)。在倾向加权队列中,接受预防的儿童SSI发生率低于未接受预防的儿童(2016年18.0例[0.9%]vs 212例7.8例[3.7%];校正优势比[AOR], 0.28;95% CI, 0.11-0.70),在二次倾向加权分析中,接受头孢唑林的儿童和接受更广谱抗生素的儿童之间的发生率相似(1399例中的13.9例[1.0%]vs 558例中的2.9例[0.5%];优势比,0.54;95% ci, 0.15-1.95)。结论和相关性:本研究结果支持非紧急胆囊切除术儿童预防用药;然而,与单独使用头孢唑林相比,使用广谱抗生素与更好的结果无关。在所有接受胆囊切除术的儿童中,有超过三分之一的人发现了优化感染预防或抗菌药物管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信