{"title":"Infections in the Culture of Catheter Urine Specimens and Bladder Biopsies in Women Undergoing Cystoscopy.","authors":"Bernadette Lemmon, Vijaya Gopalan, Akshaya Mathialagan, Livia Khullar, Vik Khullar","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06086-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common reasons for seeking medical review worldwide. Women are disproportionately affected, with a life-time incidence of 50%. Women presenting with clinical symptoms of UTI such as dysuria and urinary frequency can often have negative urine culture results, especially if they have been taking multiple courses of antibiotics. This can make the diagnosis and management of recurrent or chronic UTI challenging. In this study we compared the culture results of urine and bladder tissue in women undergoing rigid cystoscopy presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. We hypothesise that a biopsy of the bladder wall might be more likely to reveal a causative uropathogen on culture than urine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women had clean-catheter urine samples sent for urine culture and then bladder biopsies taken at cystoscopy cultured for uropathogens. Culture results from urine and bladder tissue were analysed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that under 10% of urine cultures were positive (n = 30), whereas 51% of bladder tissues cultures grew a uropathogen (n = 155). Analysis showed that the culture results of urine and bladder tissue did have a statistically significant relationship (p = 0.008). Culture of bladder tissue revealed a wider variety of uropathogens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposes that cystoscopy with a bladder biopsy for culture might be a useful adjunctive tool in selected women with refractory symptoms of urine infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06086-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common reasons for seeking medical review worldwide. Women are disproportionately affected, with a life-time incidence of 50%. Women presenting with clinical symptoms of UTI such as dysuria and urinary frequency can often have negative urine culture results, especially if they have been taking multiple courses of antibiotics. This can make the diagnosis and management of recurrent or chronic UTI challenging. In this study we compared the culture results of urine and bladder tissue in women undergoing rigid cystoscopy presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. We hypothesise that a biopsy of the bladder wall might be more likely to reveal a causative uropathogen on culture than urine.
Methods: Women had clean-catheter urine samples sent for urine culture and then bladder biopsies taken at cystoscopy cultured for uropathogens. Culture results from urine and bladder tissue were analysed and compared.
Results: We found that under 10% of urine cultures were positive (n = 30), whereas 51% of bladder tissues cultures grew a uropathogen (n = 155). Analysis showed that the culture results of urine and bladder tissue did have a statistically significant relationship (p = 0.008). Culture of bladder tissue revealed a wider variety of uropathogens.
Conclusions: This study proposes that cystoscopy with a bladder biopsy for culture might be a useful adjunctive tool in selected women with refractory symptoms of urine infection.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion