Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Le Yan, Yixuan Wang, Mi Li
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Le Yan, Yixuan Wang, Mi Li","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2466498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were explored by meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were retrieved at 25/06/23. From our inclusion criteria, seven studies (<i>N</i> = 201 patients) were included, and we performed a meta-analysis using Stata15.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggested that the total Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown obsessive com-pulsive scale<b>)</b> scale was significantly lower in patients with OCD after tDCS treatment [SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I<sup>2</sup>=39%, <i>p</i> = 0.02, Grade: high]. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant results when treatment duration ≤ 20 days [SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), <i>p</i> = 0.03]. Moreover, tDCS and sham tDCS-treated OCD patients showed neither significantly different depressive symptoms nor significantly different adverse events [RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), <i>p</i> = 0.25, Grade: moderate] and [RR = 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), <i>p</i> = 0.55, Grade: very low], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tDCS maybe reduce the Y-BOCS total scores in OCD patients and depressive symptoms, but for adverse reactions. the results are inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2466498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were explored by meta-analysis.

Method: Four electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were retrieved at 25/06/23. From our inclusion criteria, seven studies (N = 201 patients) were included, and we performed a meta-analysis using Stata15.0.

Results: Results suggested that the total Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown obsessive com-pulsive scale) scale was significantly lower in patients with OCD after tDCS treatment [SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I2=39%, p = 0.02, Grade: high]. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant results when treatment duration ≤ 20 days [SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), p = 0.03]. Moreover, tDCS and sham tDCS-treated OCD patients showed neither significantly different depressive symptoms nor significantly different adverse events [RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), p = 0.25, Grade: moderate] and [RR = 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), p = 0.55, Grade: very low], respectively.

Conclusion: tDCS maybe reduce the Y-BOCS total scores in OCD patients and depressive symptoms, but for adverse reactions. the results are inconclusive.

强迫症患者经颅直流电刺激:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
目的:通过荟萃分析探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗强迫症(OCD)的疗效和安全性。方法:于23年6月25日检索Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 4个电子数据库。从我们的纳入标准中,纳入了7项研究(N = 201例患者),我们使用Stata15.0进行了荟萃分析。结果:结果显示强迫症患者经tDCS治疗后Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown强迫症量表)总分明显降低[SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I2=39%, p = 0.02,等级:高]。亚组分析显示,治疗时间≤20 d时,结果具有统计学意义[SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), p = 0.03]。此外,tDCS与假tDCS治疗强迫症患者的抑郁症状无显著差异,不良事件也无显著差异[RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), p = 0.25,分级:中度]和[RR= 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), p = 0.55,分级:极低]。结论:tDCS可降低强迫症患者的Y-BOCS总分和抑郁症状,但对不良反应无显著影响。结果尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信