Advancements in nutritional support for critically ill patients.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001254
Philippe Huynen, Michael P Casaer, Jan Gunst
{"title":"Advancements in nutritional support for critically ill patients.","authors":"Philippe Huynen, Michael P Casaer, Jan Gunst","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize the clinical evidence on nutritional support for critically ill patients, the (patho)physiological mechanisms involved, and areas of future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Large randomized controlled trials have shown that early nutrition induces dose-dependent harm in critically ill patients, regardless of the feeding route, and that early high-dose amino acids are harmful. Harm has been attributed to feeding-induced suppression of cellular repair pathways including autophagy and ketogenesis, to aggravation of hyperglycemia and insulin needs, and to increased urea cycle activity. Additionally, acute critical illness was shown to be a state of anabolic resistance. The absence of benefit of early enhanced nutritional support on short- and long-term outcomes was observed in all studied subgroups.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While early high-dose nutrition should be avoided in all critically ill patients, the optimal initiation time of nutrition support for the individual patient, as well as ideal composition and dosing of nutrition over time remain unclear. Future studies should elucidate how fasting-induced repair pathways can be activated while avoiding prolonged starvation, and how hyperglycemia and high insulin need could be prevented. Potential strategies include intermittent fasting, ketogenic diets, ketone supplements, and alternative glucose-lowering agents, whether or not in combination with exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"212-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To summarize the clinical evidence on nutritional support for critically ill patients, the (patho)physiological mechanisms involved, and areas of future research.

Recent findings: Large randomized controlled trials have shown that early nutrition induces dose-dependent harm in critically ill patients, regardless of the feeding route, and that early high-dose amino acids are harmful. Harm has been attributed to feeding-induced suppression of cellular repair pathways including autophagy and ketogenesis, to aggravation of hyperglycemia and insulin needs, and to increased urea cycle activity. Additionally, acute critical illness was shown to be a state of anabolic resistance. The absence of benefit of early enhanced nutritional support on short- and long-term outcomes was observed in all studied subgroups.

Summary: While early high-dose nutrition should be avoided in all critically ill patients, the optimal initiation time of nutrition support for the individual patient, as well as ideal composition and dosing of nutrition over time remain unclear. Future studies should elucidate how fasting-induced repair pathways can be activated while avoiding prolonged starvation, and how hyperglycemia and high insulin need could be prevented. Potential strategies include intermittent fasting, ketogenic diets, ketone supplements, and alternative glucose-lowering agents, whether or not in combination with exercise.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信