Reciprocal causation relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality: a resting-state fMRI study.

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3
Shiyan Yang, Xu Lei
{"title":"Reciprocal causation relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality: a resting-state fMRI study.","authors":"Shiyan Yang, Xu Lei","doi":"10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination thinking is a type of negative repetitive thinking, a tendency to constantly focus on the causes, consequences and other aspects of negative events, which has implications for a variety of psychiatric disorders. Previous studies have confirmed a strong association between rumination thinking and poor sleep or insomnia, but the direction of causality between the two is not entirely clear. This study examined the relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality using a longitudinal approach and resting-state functional MRI data. Participants were 373 university students (males: <i>n</i> = 84, 18.67 ± 0.76 years old) who completed questionnaires at two time points (T1 and T2) and had resting-state MRI data collected. The results of the cross-lagged model analysis revealed a bidirectional causal relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality. Additionally, the functional connectivity (FC) of the precuneus and lingual gyrus was found to be negatively correlated with rumination thinking and sleep quality. Furthermore, mediation analysis showed that rumination thinking at T1 fully mediated the relationship between FC of the precuneus-lingual and sleep quality at T2. These findings suggest that rumination thinking and sleep quality are causally related in a bidirectional manner and that the FC of the precuneus and lingual gyrus may serve as the neural basis for rumination thinking to predict sleep quality. Overall, this study provides new insights for enhancing sleep quality and promoting overall health.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumination thinking is a type of negative repetitive thinking, a tendency to constantly focus on the causes, consequences and other aspects of negative events, which has implications for a variety of psychiatric disorders. Previous studies have confirmed a strong association between rumination thinking and poor sleep or insomnia, but the direction of causality between the two is not entirely clear. This study examined the relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality using a longitudinal approach and resting-state functional MRI data. Participants were 373 university students (males: n = 84, 18.67 ± 0.76 years old) who completed questionnaires at two time points (T1 and T2) and had resting-state MRI data collected. The results of the cross-lagged model analysis revealed a bidirectional causal relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality. Additionally, the functional connectivity (FC) of the precuneus and lingual gyrus was found to be negatively correlated with rumination thinking and sleep quality. Furthermore, mediation analysis showed that rumination thinking at T1 fully mediated the relationship between FC of the precuneus-lingual and sleep quality at T2. These findings suggest that rumination thinking and sleep quality are causally related in a bidirectional manner and that the FC of the precuneus and lingual gyrus may serve as the neural basis for rumination thinking to predict sleep quality. Overall, this study provides new insights for enhancing sleep quality and promoting overall health.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信