Development and validation of scales measuring individual, nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kiyoko Abe, Mayumi Nitta, Kuniko Chiba, Sachiko Tsujita, Yukiko Takada, Miki Sasaki, Mamiko Furuya
{"title":"Development and validation of scales measuring individual, nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses.","authors":"Kiyoko Abe, Mayumi Nitta, Kuniko Chiba, Sachiko Tsujita, Yukiko Takada, Miki Sasaki, Mamiko Furuya","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03460-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scales that comprehensively measure individual, workplace, and community factors related to fertility intentions of women are limited. This study examined the psychometric properties of scales measuring individual (nurse, husband/partner, and child), nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses. We focused on these nurses because nursing is a gendered profession, and over 90% of nurses in Japan are women. Furthermore, Japanese hospital nurses differ from other female workers in several ways (e.g., professionality, working shifts, financial remuneration).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a methodological study. Data were collected using a cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire survey. Data from 898 Japanese female hospital nurses (age range, 20-49 years) from 50 hospitals were analyzed. The initial scales were developed through semi-structured interviews, a literature review, an expert review, and a pilot study. Item analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, Cronbach's α was calculated, and known group validity was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following individual factor scales were obtained: a 12-item, four-domain nurse factor (Economic Needs, Timing of Life Events, Nursing Aspirations, and Career Development) scale, a six-item, two-domain husband/partner factor (Share of Housework and Childcare and Relationship with Husband/Partner) scale, and a three-item, one-domain child factor scale. Likewise, we identified a 13-item, four-domain nursing unit factor (Guilty Feelings toward Colleagues, Unit Nurse Manager's Management, Workability, and Collegiality) scale, a nine-item, three-domain hospital factor (Access to Legal Rights, Support for Mothers, and Comfort in Hospitals) scale, and a six-item, two-domain community factor (Governmental Family Support and Culture of Working Women) scale. Except for the child factor scale, the comparative fit index was > 0.950, and the root mean square error of approximation was < 0.070. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.590 (community factor scale) to 0.807 (child factor scale). The scores on the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales were significantly higher for nurses with high than with low fertility intentions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support the reliability and validity of the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales. The child, nursing unit, and community factor scales can be further improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03460-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scales that comprehensively measure individual, workplace, and community factors related to fertility intentions of women are limited. This study examined the psychometric properties of scales measuring individual (nurse, husband/partner, and child), nursing unit, hospital, and community factors related to fertility intentions of female Japanese hospital nurses. We focused on these nurses because nursing is a gendered profession, and over 90% of nurses in Japan are women. Furthermore, Japanese hospital nurses differ from other female workers in several ways (e.g., professionality, working shifts, financial remuneration).

Methods: This was a methodological study. Data were collected using a cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire survey. Data from 898 Japanese female hospital nurses (age range, 20-49 years) from 50 hospitals were analyzed. The initial scales were developed through semi-structured interviews, a literature review, an expert review, and a pilot study. Item analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, Cronbach's α was calculated, and known group validity was examined.

Results: The following individual factor scales were obtained: a 12-item, four-domain nurse factor (Economic Needs, Timing of Life Events, Nursing Aspirations, and Career Development) scale, a six-item, two-domain husband/partner factor (Share of Housework and Childcare and Relationship with Husband/Partner) scale, and a three-item, one-domain child factor scale. Likewise, we identified a 13-item, four-domain nursing unit factor (Guilty Feelings toward Colleagues, Unit Nurse Manager's Management, Workability, and Collegiality) scale, a nine-item, three-domain hospital factor (Access to Legal Rights, Support for Mothers, and Comfort in Hospitals) scale, and a six-item, two-domain community factor (Governmental Family Support and Culture of Working Women) scale. Except for the child factor scale, the comparative fit index was > 0.950, and the root mean square error of approximation was < 0.070. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.590 (community factor scale) to 0.807 (child factor scale). The scores on the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales were significantly higher for nurses with high than with low fertility intentions.

Conclusions: These results support the reliability and validity of the nurse, husband/partner, and hospital factor scales. The child, nursing unit, and community factor scales can be further improved.

开发并验证测量与日本医院女护士生育意愿相关的个人、护理单位、医院和社区因素的量表。
背景:能够全面测量与女性生育意愿相关的个人、工作场所和社区因素的量表非常有限。本研究考察了测量与日本医院女护士生育意愿相关的个人(护士、丈夫/伴侣和子女)、护理单位、医院和社区因素的量表的心理测量特性。我们将研究重点放在这些护士身上,因为护理是一个有性别区分的职业,而日本 90% 以上的护士都是女性。此外,日本医院护士在多个方面(如专业性、工作班次、经济报酬)与其他女性工作者不同:这是一项方法研究。方法:这是一项方法学研究,采用横断面自填式问卷调查法收集数据。对来自 50 家医院的 898 名日本医院女护士(年龄在 20-49 岁之间)的数据进行了分析。最初的量表是通过半结构化访谈、文献综述、专家评审和试点研究制定的。对量表进行了项目分析、探索性和确认性因素分析,计算了 Cronbach's α,并对已知的群体效度进行了检验:得出了以下单个因子量表:12 个项目、4 个领域的护士因子量表(经济需求、生活事件的时间安排、护理抱负和职业发展),6 个项目、2 个领域的丈夫/伴侣因子量表(分担家务和育儿以及与丈夫/伴侣的关系),以及 3 个项目、1 个领域的儿童因子量表。同样,我们还确定了一个 13 个项目、4 个领域的护理单位因素(对同事的内疚感、单位护士长的管理、工作能力和同事关系)量表,一个 9 个项目、3 个领域的医院因素(获得合法权利、对母亲的支持和在医院的舒适度)量表,以及一个 6 个项目、2 个领域的社区因素(政府的家庭支持和职业妇女文化)量表。除儿童因子量表外,比较拟合指数均大于 0.950,均方根近似误差为结论:这些结果证明了护士、丈夫/伴侣和医院因子量表的信度和效度。儿童、护理单位和社区因子量表可进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信