Sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113
Jackeline P Vajta Gomez, Dae Yong Park, Maxwell D Eder, Seokyung An, Angela Lowenstern, Michelle D Kelsey, Jennifer A Rymer, Pamela S Douglas, Michael G Nanna
{"title":"Sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Jackeline P Vajta Gomez, Dae Yong Park, Maxwell D Eder, Seokyung An, Angela Lowenstern, Michelle D Kelsey, Jennifer A Rymer, Pamela S Douglas, Michael G Nanna","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have reported worse outcomes in women following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but contemporary studies examining sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmission risk are lacking. Therefore, we sought to compare 90-day readmission rates and in-hospital adverse outcomes after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the United States National Readmissions Database to stratify all inpatient PCIs from 2017 to 2018 by sex. We then performed propensity score matching of the two groups based on demographics, medical history, hospital characteristics, clinical presentation, socioeconomic status, and procedures. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmission to the hospital. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and additional in-hospital outcomes. We performed Cox proportional-hazards modeling to compare the hazard of readmission between women and men and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for the secondary outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 206,556 women and 205,134 men were included. At index hospitalization, women experienced higher odds of in-hospital mortality, hypovolemic shock, and need of blood transfusion, while men experienced higher odds of cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury. Women had a higher hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.18, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15), with the greatest difference seen among younger women <45 years of age. Findings were similar after stratification into different age groups and clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial sex differences in outcomes after PCI persist, with variable sex differences in in-hospital complications, and women at higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission to the hospital. Given the clinical and reimbursement implications of readmissions to patients and health systems, urgent efforts are needed to close these gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 2","pages":"159-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported worse outcomes in women following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but contemporary studies examining sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmission risk are lacking. Therefore, we sought to compare 90-day readmission rates and in-hospital adverse outcomes after PCI.

Methods: We used the United States National Readmissions Database to stratify all inpatient PCIs from 2017 to 2018 by sex. We then performed propensity score matching of the two groups based on demographics, medical history, hospital characteristics, clinical presentation, socioeconomic status, and procedures. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmission to the hospital. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and additional in-hospital outcomes. We performed Cox proportional-hazards modeling to compare the hazard of readmission between women and men and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for the secondary outcomes of interest.

Results: After propensity score matching, 206,556 women and 205,134 men were included. At index hospitalization, women experienced higher odds of in-hospital mortality, hypovolemic shock, and need of blood transfusion, while men experienced higher odds of cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury. Women had a higher hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.18, P < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15), with the greatest difference seen among younger women <45 years of age. Findings were similar after stratification into different age groups and clinical presentations.

Conclusion: Substantial sex differences in outcomes after PCI persist, with variable sex differences in in-hospital complications, and women at higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission to the hospital. Given the clinical and reimbursement implications of readmissions to patients and health systems, urgent efforts are needed to close these gaps.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信