Comparing Community-Level Social Determinants of Health With Patient Race in Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Bella Mehta, Yi Yiyuan, Diyu Pearce-Fisher, Kaylee Ho, Susan M Goodman, Michael L Parks, Fei Wang, Mark A Fontana, Said Ibrahim, Peter Cram, Rich Caruana
{"title":"Comparing Community-Level Social Determinants of Health With Patient Race in Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.","authors":"Bella Mehta, Yi Yiyuan, Diyu Pearce-Fisher, Kaylee Ho, Susan M Goodman, Michael L Parks, Fei Wang, Mark A Fontana, Said Ibrahim, Peter Cram, Rich Caruana","doi":"10.1002/acr.25511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH), including race, have a key role in total hip arthroplasty (THA) disparities. We compared the collective influence of community-level SDOH to the influence of individual factors such as race, on THA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council Database (2012-2018) included 105,336 patients undergoing unilateral primary elective THA. We extracted \"community\" factors from the US census by geocoding patient zip codes, including walkability index, household income, foreign-born individuals, English proficiency, computer and internet access, unpaid family workers, those lacking health insurances, and education. We trained an explainable boosting machine, a modern form of generalized additive models, to predict 90-day readmission, 90-day mortality, one-year revision, and length of stay (LOS). Mean absolute scores were aggregated to measure variable importance (ie, variables that contributed most to the prediction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of readmission, revision, and mortality were 8%, 1.5%, and 0.3%, respectively, with a median LOS of two days. Predictive performance measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76 for mortality, 0.66 for readmission, and 0.57 for one-year revision. For LOS, the root mean squared error was 0.41 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.2). The top three predictors of mortality were community, discharge location, and age; for readmission, they were discharge location, age, and comorbidities; for revision, they were community, discharge location, and comorbidities; and for LOS, they were discharge location, community, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community-level SDOH were significantly more important than individual race in contributing to the prediction of THA outcomes, especially for 90-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Social determinants of health (SDOH), including race, have a key role in total hip arthroplasty (THA) disparities. We compared the collective influence of community-level SDOH to the influence of individual factors such as race, on THA outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council Database (2012-2018) included 105,336 patients undergoing unilateral primary elective THA. We extracted "community" factors from the US census by geocoding patient zip codes, including walkability index, household income, foreign-born individuals, English proficiency, computer and internet access, unpaid family workers, those lacking health insurances, and education. We trained an explainable boosting machine, a modern form of generalized additive models, to predict 90-day readmission, 90-day mortality, one-year revision, and length of stay (LOS). Mean absolute scores were aggregated to measure variable importance (ie, variables that contributed most to the prediction).

Results: The rates of readmission, revision, and mortality were 8%, 1.5%, and 0.3%, respectively, with a median LOS of two days. Predictive performance measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76 for mortality, 0.66 for readmission, and 0.57 for one-year revision. For LOS, the root mean squared error was 0.41 (R2 = 0.2). The top three predictors of mortality were community, discharge location, and age; for readmission, they were discharge location, age, and comorbidities; for revision, they were community, discharge location, and comorbidities; and for LOS, they were discharge location, community, and comorbidities.

Conclusion: Community-level SDOH were significantly more important than individual race in contributing to the prediction of THA outcomes, especially for 90-day mortality.

比较全髋关节置换术结果中社区水平的健康社会决定因素与患者种族。
目的:包括种族在内的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)在全髋关节置换术(THA)差异中起着关键作用。我们比较了社区层面的 SDOH 与种族等个体因素对全髋关节置换术结果的共同影响:这项对宾夕法尼亚州医疗成本控制委员会数据库(2012 年至 2018 年)的回顾性队列研究纳入了 105,336 名接受单侧初级选择性全髋关节置换术的患者。我们通过对患者邮政编码进行地理编码,从美国人口普查中提取了 "社区 "因素,包括步行指数、家庭收入、外国出生者、英语水平、计算机/互联网接入、无报酬家庭工人、缺乏医疗保险者和教育程度。我们训练了一个可解释的提升机,这是广义加法模型的一种现代形式,用于预测 90 天再入院率、90 天死亡率、1 年复查率和住院时间(LOS)。对平均绝对分数进行汇总,以衡量变量的重要性(即对预测贡献最大的变量):再入院率、翻修率和死亡率分别为 8%、1.5% 和 0.3%,中位住院时间为 2 天。根据接收者操作特征下面积测量的预测性能,死亡率为 0.76,再入院率为 0.66,1 年复查率为 0.57。对于住院时间,均方根误差为 0.41(R2=0.2)。预测死亡率的前三位因素是 "社区"、出院地点和年龄;预测再入院的前三位因素是出院地点、年龄和合并症;预测改期的前三位因素是社区、出院地点和合并症;预测住院时间的前三位因素是出院地点、社区和合并症:结论:在预测THA结果方面,社区层面的SDOH明显比个人种族更重要,尤其是在预测90天死亡率方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信