Dupilumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Persistent Asthma: Asia-Pacific Region.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Qingling Zhang, Nanshan Zhong, Sahajal Dhooria, Xiuhua Fu, Haohui Fang, Jie Lin, Shuyang Zhu, Elizabeth Laws, Yi Wang, Vivian Li, Chih-Chi Hu, Jennifer Maloney, Raolat M Abdulai, Lacey B Robinson
{"title":"Dupilumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Persistent Asthma: Asia-Pacific Region.","authors":"Qingling Zhang, Nanshan Zhong, Sahajal Dhooria, Xiuhua Fu, Haohui Fang, Jie Lin, Shuyang Zhu, Elizabeth Laws, Yi Wang, Vivian Li, Chih-Chi Hu, Jennifer Maloney, Raolat M Abdulai, Lacey B Robinson","doi":"10.1111/cea.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma prevalence is increasing in the Asia-Pacific region. China and India account for > 35% of the world's population and are often underrepresented in clinical studies. This phase 3 study (NCT03782532) evaluated efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking interleukin-4/13 signalling, in patients with persistent asthma from China and India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (≥ 12 years) were randomised 1:1 to dupilumab 200 mg or matched placebo every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (primary analysis population: blood eosinophils ≥ 150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥ 25 parts per billion without maintenance oral corticosteroid [OCS]; OCS maintenance population: 300 mg OCS).</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>change from baseline to week 12 in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>). Secondary endpoints: change from baseline to week 24 in 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5/7) scores, annualised severe exacerbation rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary analysis population (n = 414), change in FEV<sub>1</sub> by week 12 was significantly greater for dupilumab versus placebo (least squares mean difference: 0.31 L [95% CI: 0.23-0.39]; p < 0.0001). At week 24, greater reductions in ACQ-5 score were seen for dupilumab versus placebo (least squares mean difference: -0.20 [95% CI: -0.35 to -0.05]; p = 0.0097). Dupilumab reduced severe exacerbation risk by 62% versus placebo during the treatment period (relative risk: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.21-0.70]; nominal p = 0.002). Safety was similar between treatment arms; injection-site reactions were more common with dupilumab treatment (5.0%) than with placebo (1.2%). The OCS maintenance population showed similar outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dupilumab significantly improved lung function and asthma control, numerically reduced asthma exacerbations, and was well tolerated in patients from China and India with persistent asthma and evidence of either type 2 inflammation or OCS maintenance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03782532.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma prevalence is increasing in the Asia-Pacific region. China and India account for > 35% of the world's population and are often underrepresented in clinical studies. This phase 3 study (NCT03782532) evaluated efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking interleukin-4/13 signalling, in patients with persistent asthma from China and India.

Methods: Patients (≥ 12 years) were randomised 1:1 to dupilumab 200 mg or matched placebo every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (primary analysis population: blood eosinophils ≥ 150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥ 25 parts per billion without maintenance oral corticosteroid [OCS]; OCS maintenance population: 300 mg OCS).

Primary endpoint: change from baseline to week 12 in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Secondary endpoints: change from baseline to week 24 in 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5/7) scores, annualised severe exacerbation rate, and safety.

Results: In the primary analysis population (n = 414), change in FEV1 by week 12 was significantly greater for dupilumab versus placebo (least squares mean difference: 0.31 L [95% CI: 0.23-0.39]; p < 0.0001). At week 24, greater reductions in ACQ-5 score were seen for dupilumab versus placebo (least squares mean difference: -0.20 [95% CI: -0.35 to -0.05]; p = 0.0097). Dupilumab reduced severe exacerbation risk by 62% versus placebo during the treatment period (relative risk: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.21-0.70]; nominal p = 0.002). Safety was similar between treatment arms; injection-site reactions were more common with dupilumab treatment (5.0%) than with placebo (1.2%). The OCS maintenance population showed similar outcomes.

Conclusion: Dupilumab significantly improved lung function and asthma control, numerically reduced asthma exacerbations, and was well tolerated in patients from China and India with persistent asthma and evidence of either type 2 inflammation or OCS maintenance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03782532.

Dupilumab在持续性哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性:亚太地区。
背景:哮喘患病率在亚太地区呈上升趋势。中国和印度占世界人口的35%,在临床研究中往往代表性不足。这项3期研究(NCT03782532)评估了dupilumab(一种阻断白细胞介素4/13信号传导的单克隆抗体)在中国和印度持续性哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:患者(≥12岁)每2周以1:1的比例随机分配至dupilumab 200 mg或匹配的安慰剂,持续24周(主要分析人群:血液嗜酸性粒细胞≥150细胞/μL或分数呼出一氧化氮≥25亿分之一,无维持口服皮质类固醇[OCS];OCS维持人群:300 mg OCS)。主要终点:1秒内用力呼气量(FEV1)从基线到第12周的变化。次要终点:5项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5/7)评分从基线到第24周的变化,年化严重恶化率和安全性。结果:在主要分析人群(n = 414)中,dupilumab与安慰剂相比,第12周FEV1的变化显著大于dupilumab(最小二乘平均差:0.31 L [95% CI: 0.23-0.39];结论:Dupilumab显著改善了肺功能和哮喘控制,减少了哮喘加重,并且在中国和印度的持续性哮喘患者中具有良好的耐受性,并且有2型炎症或OCS维持的证据。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03782532。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信