In Vitro Reliability and Stress Distribution of Wide Diameter Extra-Short Implants as Support for Single Crowns and Fixed Partial Dentures

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Vanessa Felipe Vargas-Moreno, Michele Costa de Oliveira Ribeiro, Rafael Soares Gomes, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury, Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado
{"title":"In Vitro Reliability and Stress Distribution of Wide Diameter Extra-Short Implants as Support for Single Crowns and Fixed Partial Dentures","authors":"Vanessa Felipe Vargas-Moreno,&nbsp;Michele Costa de Oliveira Ribeiro,&nbsp;Rafael Soares Gomes,&nbsp;Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo,&nbsp;Estevam Augusto Bonfante,&nbsp;Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury,&nbsp;Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the reliability, failure mode, and stress distribution of wide-diameter extra-short dental implants (ESDI) as support for single crowns (SC) and fixed partial dentures (FPD) (3:1 crown-to-implant ratio [<i>C</i>:<i>I</i>]) for rehabilitation in the posterior atrophic mandible. For that, 126 ESDI (of 5 mm length) were allocated in four groups based on diameter (Ø4 and Ø6 mm) and prostheses (SC and FPD): SC4, SC6, FPD4, and FPD6. The fatigue test was performed by step-stress accelerated life testing (<i>n</i> = 21/group), failure mode by fractographic analysis, and stress distribution by finite element analysis: von Mises stress (<i>σ</i><sub>vM</sub>), maximum shear stress (<i>τ</i><sub>max</sub>), and minimum principal stress (<i>σ</i><sub>min</sub>). Reliability at 200 N was higher than 84% in both SC4 and SC6, with SC6 showing significantly higher reliability at 300 N. Failure mode involved the abutment (SC4 and SC6). The missions were suspended for the FPD groups due to 100% survival at the maximum load. The <i>σ</i><sub>vM</sub> showed a stress reduction of about 40% at the SC6 implant when compared to SC4 and FPD6 compared to FPD4. For the abutment, a minor decrease of at least 6.72% was observed comparing SC6 to SC4 and 2.78% for the FPD6 compared to FPD4. The <i>τ</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>σ</i><sub>min</sub> in the cortical bone demonstrated a stress reduction of at least 38.85% for the SC6 compared to SC4 and at least 3.78% in FPD6 compared to FPD4. The <i>σ</i><sub>min</sub> in the cancellous bone showed an overall reduction of at least 8.46% for SC6 compared to SC4 and for FPD6 compared to FPD4. But, for <i>τ</i><sub>max</sub>, in the cancellous bone, a 19.42% higher stress was found in SC6 compared to SC4 and 27.21% in FPD6 compared to FPD4. Finally, when splinting was used, a general stress reduction was found, about 50% in both diameters in the implant and abutment. According to the limitations of this in vitro study, it is possible to conclude that both groups (SC4 and SC6) showed high reliability in clinically relevant loads for the posterior atrophic mandible, SC6 having the lowest probability of failure at 300 N, with failure restricted to the abutment. Meanwhile, FPD6 has better stress distribution.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the reliability, failure mode, and stress distribution of wide-diameter extra-short dental implants (ESDI) as support for single crowns (SC) and fixed partial dentures (FPD) (3:1 crown-to-implant ratio [C:I]) for rehabilitation in the posterior atrophic mandible. For that, 126 ESDI (of 5 mm length) were allocated in four groups based on diameter (Ø4 and Ø6 mm) and prostheses (SC and FPD): SC4, SC6, FPD4, and FPD6. The fatigue test was performed by step-stress accelerated life testing (n = 21/group), failure mode by fractographic analysis, and stress distribution by finite element analysis: von Mises stress (σvM), maximum shear stress (τmax), and minimum principal stress (σmin). Reliability at 200 N was higher than 84% in both SC4 and SC6, with SC6 showing significantly higher reliability at 300 N. Failure mode involved the abutment (SC4 and SC6). The missions were suspended for the FPD groups due to 100% survival at the maximum load. The σvM showed a stress reduction of about 40% at the SC6 implant when compared to SC4 and FPD6 compared to FPD4. For the abutment, a minor decrease of at least 6.72% was observed comparing SC6 to SC4 and 2.78% for the FPD6 compared to FPD4. The τmax and σmin in the cortical bone demonstrated a stress reduction of at least 38.85% for the SC6 compared to SC4 and at least 3.78% in FPD6 compared to FPD4. The σmin in the cancellous bone showed an overall reduction of at least 8.46% for SC6 compared to SC4 and for FPD6 compared to FPD4. But, for τmax, in the cancellous bone, a 19.42% higher stress was found in SC6 compared to SC4 and 27.21% in FPD6 compared to FPD4. Finally, when splinting was used, a general stress reduction was found, about 50% in both diameters in the implant and abutment. According to the limitations of this in vitro study, it is possible to conclude that both groups (SC4 and SC6) showed high reliability in clinically relevant loads for the posterior atrophic mandible, SC6 having the lowest probability of failure at 300 N, with failure restricted to the abutment. Meanwhile, FPD6 has better stress distribution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信