Digitally Guided Aspiration Technique for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation in the Presence of Cysts: A Case Series

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1111/cid.70009

Yuhuan Jiang, Yujia Yang, Liya Chen, Weikai Zhou, Yi Man, Jing Wang

{"title":"Digitally Guided Aspiration Technique for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation in the Presence of Cysts: A Case Series","authors":"Yuhuan Jiang, Yujia Yang, Liya Chen, Weikai Zhou, Yi Man, Jing Wang","doi":"10.1111/cid.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Sinus floor elevation (SFE) is a widely established surgical procedure for dental implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, the presence of maxillary sinus cysts (MSCs) can significantly complicate this intervention. This study presents and evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Digitally Guided Aspiration Technique (DGAT), a novel approach for managing MSCs during SFE procedures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Implant survival and success rates were evaluated according to established criteria, and all complications were systematically documented. Three-dimensional measurements, including MSC volume, residual bone height (BH) surrounding the implants, and apical bone coverage, were obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed through standardized periapical radiographs following prosthetic loading. The accuracy of implant positioning was evaluated by measuring the three-dimensional deviations between virtually planned and actually placed implants. Comprehensive cytological and histological analyses were conducted on aspirated cystic fluid and harvested bone specimens, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using questionnaires at the 6-month post-restoration follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study comprised seven patients with seven cysts receiving a total of 10 implants. At the 6-month follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% with no biological or technical complications observed. Volumetric analysis revealed a significant mean reduction in MSC volume of 45.34% ± 33.08% (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Postoperative measurements demonstrated a statistically significant increase in BH compared to baseline values (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This gain remained largely stable throughout the 6-month observation period, with minimal resorption noted in the buccal aspect (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and mean value (<i>p</i> = 0.05). Prior to second-stage surgery, radiographic evaluation confirmed complete bone coverage of all implants, with 60% exhibiting > 2 mm of apical bone coverage. MBL remained within physiological limits. Analysis of implant positioning accuracy showed that coronal global and vertical deviations fell within acceptable clinical parameters, while apical global deviation and angular deviation marginally exceeded recommended thresholds. Cytological analysis of the aspirated cystic fluid revealed no evidence of infection, while histological examination of the regenerated tissue demonstrated mature bone formation with abundant vascularization. Patient-reported outcomes indicated high satisfaction levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DGAT can reduce the volume of MSCs, achieve favorable bone grafting and dental implant outcomes with a low incidence of complications. The safety and effectiveness of this procedure need to be compared to the traditional aspiration technique in future randomized controlled trials.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400083235. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Sinus floor elevation (SFE) is a widely established surgical procedure for dental implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, the presence of maxillary sinus cysts (MSCs) can significantly complicate this intervention. This study presents and evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Digitally Guided Aspiration Technique (DGAT), a novel approach for managing MSCs during SFE procedures.

Materials and Methods

Implant survival and success rates were evaluated according to established criteria, and all complications were systematically documented. Three-dimensional measurements, including MSC volume, residual bone height (BH) surrounding the implants, and apical bone coverage, were obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed through standardized periapical radiographs following prosthetic loading. The accuracy of implant positioning was evaluated by measuring the three-dimensional deviations between virtually planned and actually placed implants. Comprehensive cytological and histological analyses were conducted on aspirated cystic fluid and harvested bone specimens, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using questionnaires at the 6-month post-restoration follow-up.

Results

The study comprised seven patients with seven cysts receiving a total of 10 implants. At the 6-month follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% with no biological or technical complications observed. Volumetric analysis revealed a significant mean reduction in MSC volume of 45.34% ± 33.08% (p = 0.012). Postoperative measurements demonstrated a statistically significant increase in BH compared to baseline values (p < 0.001). This gain remained largely stable throughout the 6-month observation period, with minimal resorption noted in the buccal aspect (p = 0.03) and mean value (p = 0.05). Prior to second-stage surgery, radiographic evaluation confirmed complete bone coverage of all implants, with 60% exhibiting > 2 mm of apical bone coverage. MBL remained within physiological limits. Analysis of implant positioning accuracy showed that coronal global and vertical deviations fell within acceptable clinical parameters, while apical global deviation and angular deviation marginally exceeded recommended thresholds. Cytological analysis of the aspirated cystic fluid revealed no evidence of infection, while histological examination of the regenerated tissue demonstrated mature bone formation with abundant vascularization. Patient-reported outcomes indicated high satisfaction levels.

Conclusions

DGAT can reduce the volume of MSCs, achieve favorable bone grafting and dental implant outcomes with a low incidence of complications. The safety and effectiveness of this procedure need to be compared to the traditional aspiration technique in future randomized controlled trials.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400083235. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

13.90%

发文量

103

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.