Augustine K. Osei, Naresh V. Thevathasan, Maren Oelbermann
{"title":"Soil Organic Carbon Storage of Different Soil-Sized Fractions in Perennial Bioenergy Crops on Marginally Productive Cropland in Southern Canada","authors":"Augustine K. Osei, Naresh V. Thevathasan, Maren Oelbermann","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding carbon (C) storage in different soil-sized fractions of perennial bioenergy crops enhances our knowledge of how these crops contribute to long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, with positive implications for mitigating climate change through C sequestration. However, the extent to which perennial bioenergy crops contribute C in different soil-sized fractions remains unclear. Hence, this study investigated SOC contents under perennial bioenergy crops of <i>Miscanthus</i> (<i>Miscanthus</i> × <i>giganteus</i> L.), willow (<i>Salix miyabeana</i> L.), switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.), and a successional site. We also quantified the C contribution of the bioenergy crops to different soil-sized fractions using the δ<sup>13</sup>C natural abundance technique. After 12 years of cultivation, SOC contents to 30 cm depth increased by 2.5% and 3.1% in willow and <i>Miscanthus</i>, respectively, but decreased by 3.7% in switchgrass compared to baseline SOC data. SOC stocks ranged from 5686 to 7002 g C m<sup>−2</sup> and were higher (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.050) in the successional site compared to switchgrass and willow, but not <i>Miscanthus</i>. Unlike switchgrass and willow, <i>Miscanthus</i> maintained SOC stocks comparable to the successional site even with annual biomass harvest. This implies that the ability of perennial bioenergy crops to influence SOC storage similar to regrowth vegetation on marginally productive cropland depends significantly on the crop species. Additionally, <i>Miscanthus</i> contained higher (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.013) SOC in micro-sized and silt + clay fractions at 20–30 cm depth compared to the 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths and contributed the most C in all three soil-sized fractions compared to switchgrass and willow. Our findings suggest that among the three bioenergy crops, <i>Miscanthus</i> has the greatest potential for long-term C storage and stabilization in deeper soil depths on marginally productive croplands. This holds true even with annual biomass harvesting and the absence of fertilization, making <i>Miscanthus</i> a valuable contributor to climate change mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding carbon (C) storage in different soil-sized fractions of perennial bioenergy crops enhances our knowledge of how these crops contribute to long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, with positive implications for mitigating climate change through C sequestration. However, the extent to which perennial bioenergy crops contribute C in different soil-sized fractions remains unclear. Hence, this study investigated SOC contents under perennial bioenergy crops of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus L.), willow (Salix miyabeana L.), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), and a successional site. We also quantified the C contribution of the bioenergy crops to different soil-sized fractions using the δ13C natural abundance technique. After 12 years of cultivation, SOC contents to 30 cm depth increased by 2.5% and 3.1% in willow and Miscanthus, respectively, but decreased by 3.7% in switchgrass compared to baseline SOC data. SOC stocks ranged from 5686 to 7002 g C m−2 and were higher (p ≤ 0.050) in the successional site compared to switchgrass and willow, but not Miscanthus. Unlike switchgrass and willow, Miscanthus maintained SOC stocks comparable to the successional site even with annual biomass harvest. This implies that the ability of perennial bioenergy crops to influence SOC storage similar to regrowth vegetation on marginally productive cropland depends significantly on the crop species. Additionally, Miscanthus contained higher (p ≤ 0.013) SOC in micro-sized and silt + clay fractions at 20–30 cm depth compared to the 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths and contributed the most C in all three soil-sized fractions compared to switchgrass and willow. Our findings suggest that among the three bioenergy crops, Miscanthus has the greatest potential for long-term C storage and stabilization in deeper soil depths on marginally productive croplands. This holds true even with annual biomass harvesting and the absence of fertilization, making Miscanthus a valuable contributor to climate change mitigation.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.