Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs)

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Abdulellah Al Thobaity
{"title":"Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs)","authors":"Abdulellah Al Thobaity","doi":"10.1155/jonm/4239274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Crowded emergency departments (EDs) adversely affect patient care and healthcare efficiency, leading to prolonged wait times, delayed treatments, and increased medical errors. This issue also diminishes patient satisfaction and disrupts hospital operations. In Saudi Arabia, ED overcrowding impacts response times and staff morale, highlighting the need for efficient patient flow processes to ensure timely and effective care.</p>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study is to identify the main bottlenecks in the workflow of Saudi Arabian EDs from patient arrival to disposition.</p>\n <p><b>Design:</b> A retrospective quantitative study analyzed data from 753 patients across multiple hospitals in Saudi Arabia’s EDs to identify workflow bottlenecks. Using SPSS and AMOS for data analysis, various statistical methods, including ANOVA and structural equation modeling (SEM), were employed to evaluate key performance metrics and their influence on the total length of stay (LOS).</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The Doctor to Decision Time is the most significant bottleneck, followed by the Triage to Doctor Time. CTAS3 and CTAS4 categories experience the most significant delays across multiple stages. In addition, the default model in AMOS 29 shows an excellent fit, indicating that reducing delays in Decision to Disposition Time (estimate = 0.840) and Doctor to Decision Time (estimate = 0.442) is crucial for improving the total LOS in the ED.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study identifies significant inefficiencies in the ED workflow in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the Doctor to Decision Time and Triage to Doctor Time stages, and recommends streamlining consultation protocols, enhancing medication delivery, expediting lab and radiology services, and increasing staffing to improve operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Faster bed turnover reduces Decision to Disposition Time and frees up ED beds. Adequate staffing improves triage, evaluation times, and care quality. Well-trained nurses enhance patient interactions and reduce delays. Standardized guidelines ensure timely treatment. Effective communication and teamwork improve patient flow and reduce bottlenecks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4239274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4239274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Crowded emergency departments (EDs) adversely affect patient care and healthcare efficiency, leading to prolonged wait times, delayed treatments, and increased medical errors. This issue also diminishes patient satisfaction and disrupts hospital operations. In Saudi Arabia, ED overcrowding impacts response times and staff morale, highlighting the need for efficient patient flow processes to ensure timely and effective care.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the main bottlenecks in the workflow of Saudi Arabian EDs from patient arrival to disposition.

Design: A retrospective quantitative study analyzed data from 753 patients across multiple hospitals in Saudi Arabia’s EDs to identify workflow bottlenecks. Using SPSS and AMOS for data analysis, various statistical methods, including ANOVA and structural equation modeling (SEM), were employed to evaluate key performance metrics and their influence on the total length of stay (LOS).

Results: The Doctor to Decision Time is the most significant bottleneck, followed by the Triage to Doctor Time. CTAS3 and CTAS4 categories experience the most significant delays across multiple stages. In addition, the default model in AMOS 29 shows an excellent fit, indicating that reducing delays in Decision to Disposition Time (estimate = 0.840) and Doctor to Decision Time (estimate = 0.442) is crucial for improving the total LOS in the ED.

Conclusion: This study identifies significant inefficiencies in the ED workflow in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the Doctor to Decision Time and Triage to Doctor Time stages, and recommends streamlining consultation protocols, enhancing medication delivery, expediting lab and radiology services, and increasing staffing to improve operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Faster bed turnover reduces Decision to Disposition Time and frees up ED beds. Adequate staffing improves triage, evaluation times, and care quality. Well-trained nurses enhance patient interactions and reduce delays. Standardized guidelines ensure timely treatment. Effective communication and teamwork improve patient flow and reduce bottlenecks.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信