{"title":"Advanced Distillation Technologies for Dimethyl Ether Production: A Comprehensive Techno-economic Evaluation","authors":"Muhammad Fikri Ramadhan, Rahma Muthia","doi":"10.1007/s11814-025-00387-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dimethyl ether is a promising alternative energy source to liquefied petroleum gas and diesel fuel due to its cleaner combustion properties. However, dimethyl ether production from methanol typically suffers from intense energy consumption, high CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and large costs. Advanced distillation technologies, particularly reactive distillation (RD) and dividing-wall column (DWC), are potentially capable of addressing such issues. The present study evaluates the techno-economic performance of those advanced distillation technologies by accounting for a complete set of reaction and separation functions and an identical catalyst, i.e., Amberlyst-35, for each process configuration. The use of a common catalyst ensures that the identified performance differences are attributable to the technology configurations themselves rather than the variations in catalyst type. The finding interestingly suggests that the DWC scheme outperforms both conventional reactor-distillation and RD schemes. The specific energy consumptions for the conventional, RD and DWC schemes are 1.74, 4.10 and 1.41 GJ/ton, respectively, while the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for those schemes are 0.09, 0.22 and 0.08 tons CO<sub>2</sub>/ton, respectively. The DWC scheme offers the lowest total annual cost, i.e., $1,601,733/year, followed by the conventional and RD schemes, which are $1,844,407/year and $2,585,633/year, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":684,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 3","pages":"505 - 527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-025-00387-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dimethyl ether is a promising alternative energy source to liquefied petroleum gas and diesel fuel due to its cleaner combustion properties. However, dimethyl ether production from methanol typically suffers from intense energy consumption, high CO2 emissions, and large costs. Advanced distillation technologies, particularly reactive distillation (RD) and dividing-wall column (DWC), are potentially capable of addressing such issues. The present study evaluates the techno-economic performance of those advanced distillation technologies by accounting for a complete set of reaction and separation functions and an identical catalyst, i.e., Amberlyst-35, for each process configuration. The use of a common catalyst ensures that the identified performance differences are attributable to the technology configurations themselves rather than the variations in catalyst type. The finding interestingly suggests that the DWC scheme outperforms both conventional reactor-distillation and RD schemes. The specific energy consumptions for the conventional, RD and DWC schemes are 1.74, 4.10 and 1.41 GJ/ton, respectively, while the CO2 emissions for those schemes are 0.09, 0.22 and 0.08 tons CO2/ton, respectively. The DWC scheme offers the lowest total annual cost, i.e., $1,601,733/year, followed by the conventional and RD schemes, which are $1,844,407/year and $2,585,633/year, respectively.
二甲醚具有清洁燃烧的特性,是一种很有前途的替代液化石油气和柴油的能源。然而,用甲醇生产二甲醚通常能耗高、二氧化碳排放量高、成本高。先进的蒸馏技术,特别是反应蒸馏(RD)和分壁塔(DWC),有可能解决这些问题。本研究通过考虑一套完整的反应和分离功能以及一种相同的催化剂,即Amberlyst-35,对每种工艺配置评估了这些先进蒸馏技术的技术经济性能。使用通用催化剂可确保所确定的性能差异可归因于技术配置本身,而不是催化剂类型的变化。有趣的是,这一发现表明,DWC方案优于传统的反应器蒸馏和RD方案。常规方案、RD方案和DWC方案的比能耗分别为1.74、4.10和1.41 GJ/t, CO2排放量分别为0.09、0.22和0.08 t CO2/t。DWC计划的年度总成本最低,为1,601,733元/年,其次是常规计划和研发计划,分别为1,844,407元/年和2,585,633元/年。
期刊介绍:
The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering provides a global forum for the dissemination of research in chemical engineering. The Journal publishes significant research results obtained in the Asia-Pacific region, and simultaneously introduces recent technical progress made in other areas of the world to this region. Submitted research papers must be of potential industrial significance and specifically concerned with chemical engineering. The editors will give preference to papers having a clearly stated practical scope and applicability in the areas of chemical engineering, and to those where new theoretical concepts are supported by new experimental details. The Journal also regularly publishes featured reviews on emerging and industrially important subjects of chemical engineering as well as selected papers presented at international conferences on the subjects.