Pauline Goger, Ruiyuan Guo, Soobin Jo, Christine B. Cha, Jessica Ribeiro, Xieyining Huang, Kathryn R. Fox
{"title":"Moderators and Mediators of Treatments for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Review of More Than 50 Years of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Pauline Goger, Ruiyuan Guo, Soobin Jo, Christine B. Cha, Jessica Ribeiro, Xieyining Huang, Kathryn R. Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychosocial treatments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are in need of improvement, as suicide rates have substantially increased in the last 20 years and current interventions show limited efficacy. One way to potentially boost response rates is to personalize treatments by identifying what works how and for whom to maximize impact across different individuals. A scoping review of all suicide treatment randomized controlled trials was performed on PubMed, PsycInfo, and GoogleScholar through May 2024 to identify moderators and mediators of suicide treatment. Forty-six studies including moderators and 15 studies including mediators were identified and evaluated by at least two independent researchers. The most frequently tested moderators across both adults and adolescents include age, gender/sex, history of STBs, therapeutic alliance, comorbid depression, and comorbid borderline personality disorder diagnoses or symptoms, with the strongest support found for therapeutic alliance in adults. No mediator was tested in more than one trial or research group, but hopelessness, avoidance, mentalization, and number of treatment contacts in adolescents and resilience, anxiety sensitivity, acceptance, and therapeutic relationship in adults showed positive signals. Overall, additional work is needed as heterogeneity, lack of replication attempts, and concerns about moderator and mediator quality currently limit confidence in findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 2","pages":"Pages 241-260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424001527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychosocial treatments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are in need of improvement, as suicide rates have substantially increased in the last 20 years and current interventions show limited efficacy. One way to potentially boost response rates is to personalize treatments by identifying what works how and for whom to maximize impact across different individuals. A scoping review of all suicide treatment randomized controlled trials was performed on PubMed, PsycInfo, and GoogleScholar through May 2024 to identify moderators and mediators of suicide treatment. Forty-six studies including moderators and 15 studies including mediators were identified and evaluated by at least two independent researchers. The most frequently tested moderators across both adults and adolescents include age, gender/sex, history of STBs, therapeutic alliance, comorbid depression, and comorbid borderline personality disorder diagnoses or symptoms, with the strongest support found for therapeutic alliance in adults. No mediator was tested in more than one trial or research group, but hopelessness, avoidance, mentalization, and number of treatment contacts in adolescents and resilience, anxiety sensitivity, acceptance, and therapeutic relationship in adults showed positive signals. Overall, additional work is needed as heterogeneity, lack of replication attempts, and concerns about moderator and mediator quality currently limit confidence in findings.
期刊介绍:
Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.