Gholam Hassan Khajavy , Ghasem Modarresi , S. Yahya Hejazi
{"title":"Exploring and addressing concerns surrounding L2 grit: A longitudinal perspective","authors":"Gholam Hassan Khajavy , Ghasem Modarresi , S. Yahya Hejazi","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, concerns have been raised about the conceptualization, measurement, factor structure, and predictive validity of second/foreign language (L2) grit. The present study aims to address these issues. Data were collected from 223 Iranian tertiary-level L2 learners at three time points over a semester. At each time point, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their L2 grit, L2 self-efficacy, conscientiousness, and self-perceived language proficiency (SPLP). Results indicated that the revised L2 grit scale consisted of two components and demonstrated measurement invariance over time. Furthermore, the L2 grit components increased over time, were longitudinally linked to SPLP, and had small-sized relationships with conscientiousness. Relative weight analysis showed that, in addition to L2 self-efficacy, the L2 grit components were significant predictors of SPLP. The findings suggest that the newly developed L2 grit scale is a psychometrically sound tool for measuring L2 grit.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications of the research</h3><div>Our findings indicated that L2 grit components were related to language learners' self-perceived language proficiency. In addition, we found that L2 grit components changed over a semester. These findings suggest that, first, L2 grit is malleable and subject to change. Second, given its link to L2 achievement outcomes, language teachers should use strategies and techniques to improve their learners' L2 grit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102660"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000366","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recently, concerns have been raised about the conceptualization, measurement, factor structure, and predictive validity of second/foreign language (L2) grit. The present study aims to address these issues. Data were collected from 223 Iranian tertiary-level L2 learners at three time points over a semester. At each time point, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their L2 grit, L2 self-efficacy, conscientiousness, and self-perceived language proficiency (SPLP). Results indicated that the revised L2 grit scale consisted of two components and demonstrated measurement invariance over time. Furthermore, the L2 grit components increased over time, were longitudinally linked to SPLP, and had small-sized relationships with conscientiousness. Relative weight analysis showed that, in addition to L2 self-efficacy, the L2 grit components were significant predictors of SPLP. The findings suggest that the newly developed L2 grit scale is a psychometrically sound tool for measuring L2 grit.
Educational relevance and implications of the research
Our findings indicated that L2 grit components were related to language learners' self-perceived language proficiency. In addition, we found that L2 grit components changed over a semester. These findings suggest that, first, L2 grit is malleable and subject to change. Second, given its link to L2 achievement outcomes, language teachers should use strategies and techniques to improve their learners' L2 grit.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).