Acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A qualitative exploratory study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sally A.M. Sara , Nicole Heneka , Suzanne K. Chambers , Jeff Dunn , Victoria R. Terry
{"title":"Acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A qualitative exploratory study","authors":"Sally A.M. Sara ,&nbsp;Nicole Heneka ,&nbsp;Suzanne K. Chambers ,&nbsp;Jeff Dunn ,&nbsp;Victoria R. Terry","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the acceptability of a five-session, nurse-led, survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), delivered via a specialist prostate cancer telehealth service.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative exploratory study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability<strong>.</strong> The study was undertaken in an established Australian specialist prostate cancer tele-nursing service. Study participants were men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who: (i) were about to start or were within 3 months of commencing ADT; (ii) had a treatment plan for at least 12 months of continuous ADT; (iii) had no current psychiatric illness or history of head injury and/or dementia; and (iv) had no other concurrent cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). A purposive sampling strategy was used for recruitment.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Nineteen participants took part in semi-structured interviews, comprising men who had completed the program (n = 18) and the nurse who had delivered it (n = 1). Overall acceptability was high across all constructs of the TFA, and particularly strong across the domains of ethicality and self-efficacy. Quality of design, structure and content was seen as highly favourable, as was the strength of the therapeutic relationship that developed between the nurse and the participants. Clinically, the program delivered sizeable gains in knowledge about ADT impact on physical, psychological, and sexual wellbeing, and confidence to identify and proactively manage side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings from this study suggest that a nurse-led, psychoeducation program for men on ADT is highly acceptable, with great potential for implementation at scale via a national specialist nursing program.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925000602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the acceptability of a five-session, nurse-led, survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), delivered via a specialist prostate cancer telehealth service.

Methods

A qualitative exploratory study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. The study was undertaken in an established Australian specialist prostate cancer tele-nursing service. Study participants were men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who: (i) were about to start or were within 3 months of commencing ADT; (ii) had a treatment plan for at least 12 months of continuous ADT; (iii) had no current psychiatric illness or history of head injury and/or dementia; and (iv) had no other concurrent cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). A purposive sampling strategy was used for recruitment.

Findings

Nineteen participants took part in semi-structured interviews, comprising men who had completed the program (n = 18) and the nurse who had delivered it (n = 1). Overall acceptability was high across all constructs of the TFA, and particularly strong across the domains of ethicality and self-efficacy. Quality of design, structure and content was seen as highly favourable, as was the strength of the therapeutic relationship that developed between the nurse and the participants. Clinically, the program delivered sizeable gains in knowledge about ADT impact on physical, psychological, and sexual wellbeing, and confidence to identify and proactively manage side effects.

Conclusions

Findings from this study suggest that a nurse-led, psychoeducation program for men on ADT is highly acceptable, with great potential for implementation at scale via a national specialist nursing program.
接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者接受护士主导的生存干预的可接受性:一项定性探索性研究
目的评估接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的前列腺癌患者通过专科前列腺癌远程医疗服务进行的五期护士主导的生存干预的可接受性。方法采用可接受性理论框架进行定性探索性研究。这项研究是在澳大利亚一个成熟的前列腺癌远程护理服务专家中进行的。研究参与者是诊断为前列腺癌的男性,他们:(i)即将开始或在3个月内开始ADT;(ii)有至少12个月的连续ADT治疗计划;(iii)现时无精神疾病或头部受伤及/或痴呆史;(iv)无其他并发癌症(不包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌)。采用有目的的抽样策略进行招募。19名参与者参加了半结构化访谈,包括完成该项目的男性(n = 18)和提供该项目的护士(n = 1)。TFA的所有结构的总体可接受性都很高,尤其是在道德和自我效能方面。设计、结构和内容的质量被认为是非常有利的,护士和参与者之间发展的治疗关系的强度也是如此。在临床方面,该项目在了解ADT对身体、心理和性健康的影响方面取得了相当大的进展,并增强了识别和主动管理副作用的信心。结论:本研究的结果表明,护士主导的ADT男性心理教育计划是高度可接受的,通过国家专科护理计划大规模实施的潜力很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信